My step father is a really extreme, somewhat irrational person. In the 1970's he owned a couple of larger cars - a 1974 Buick Century with 350 V-8, and then a 1976 Pontiac Laurentien, also with a 350. Pretty big cars for a single guy who didn't haul anything, but he just liked larger cars, and they were pretty average size for the 1970's.
Anyway, in 1981, with gas prices going up, etc... he suddenly decides he needs to be more 'environmentally friendly', and get a more fuel efficient car. Reasonable idea. So he goes to his local Pontiac dealer, and he buys a 1981 Pontiac Acadian, with the 1.6 and an automatic.
To this day, he still moans to anyone who brings it up what an aweful car that Acadian was - how it was so small, tinny and gutless it was, and how cars that small are actually a safety hazard to people, and how automakers are endangering the public by still making small cars. Given his choice, we should all be driving Cadillacs, Marquis, and Suburbans!
The thing that always got me, that I tried to bring up to him, is of course he would have felt that - he went from one of Pontiacs biggest cars, to its absolute smallest, in one move. I always thought he should have lessened the shock by going down to a slightly smaller car - maybe a LeMans with a 301, or if he insisted on going small, he could have gotten a Phoenix with a 4 or V-6. These still would have been a decent size, and gotten much better mileage. Oh well, some people!
I've never owned one of these cars, but have been in plenty - I always thought they had a very 'odd' feeling interior - so narrow, long, and low to the ground - kinda sporty, but w/out any power to back it up!