Yes, but now it's faster than many "sporty" cars, gets insane mileage, and has Toyota reliability. It also drives and handles way better than a RAV4 has any right to. Motortrend says it hustles the Figure 8 with almost the same speed as the BMW X3, and I agree, mine handles extremely well. Hitting the corners with my friend's WRX STi (before you ask, they accelerated very similarly prior to his Stage 1 tune and intake, but he will get a several car jump because as a manual, his car can start with the rpms hanging at 5500-6K or whatever. Once that initial jump is over, they just sit deadlocked with the same space between them), he was pushing maybe 2-3mph faster in some of the more sedate sweepers and it made him very nervous, while I was well within my comfort zone. Fairness though, the temps were around 50*F and he was on summer tires. Feedback is lacking compared to other vehicles I've driven, for sure, but the limits are pretty astounding for a RAV. The Adventure package RAV4, with torque vectoring, for example, took 27.5 seconds to hit the MT figure 8, while this one took 27.0. One tenth of a second behind the X3, and Stelvio.
All in all for a vehicle that nets me 50-60mpg and has a powertrain that is super cheap and easy to maintain, and proven reliable, I thought it a helluva bargain for $45K+TT&L - $7500 tax credit. My only complaint is that feedback is muted, as one expects from a Toyota, while handling is crisp and flat, and the suspension is very stiff while also being well damped, which one does NOT expect of a Toyota. It creates a bit of a disconnect between actual capability and feedback that I find annoying. Basically, Toyota tuned their EPAS feel for grandma, and the suspension for guys like me. It's weird putting them together, but with a learning curve, it's a blast.