Rental review - 2024 RAV4 "Adventure"

dishdude

$100 Site Donor 2023
Joined
Nov 14, 2008
Messages
17,468
Location
Phoenix
Currently driving this RAV4 in a trim I never knew existed. Apparently the Adventure trim is a low cost off road option that includes AWD as standard equipment. I don't know who plans to offroad a RAV4, but I can't see it going well.

Anyways, this is the first rental of this RAV4 generation I've had, I really didn't like the previous generation and have avoided them up until now, but options at the airport were scarce so I hopped in this.

Pros - Powertrain is a 2.5 NA with a conventional 8 speed transmission. It has enough power for everyday driving, I wouldn't challenge anyone to a race but it does fine. It does need to get into the higher rev bands to make enough power to pass or merge at highway speeds, but it's more than adequate. The ride is well composed and comfortable, and I thought the steering/brakes/handling were all predictable, responsive and well dialed in. The driver's seat is power, and it was easy to find a comfortable driving position and seat support was good. I really like Toyota's latest climate controls, they are laid out logically and easy to operate. Plenty of room for four adults and cargo.

Cons - A lot of wind noise leaked in around the door seals at highway speeds. The infotainment system is terrible, luckily wireless Android Auto and CarPlay are supported, although the screen is on the smaller side. The seats were covered in a terrible material I can only describe as rubber, it's not leather or anything remotely simulating leather - it's uncomfortable, doesn't breathe and just has a terrible, cheap feel. Not sure what they were thinking with the orange trim around the center console, it looked really out of place, and the fuel door release was in an awkward location and not well labeled, some white paint instead of relying on a molded in symbol would have been nice especially considering the weird location.

Bottom line - at $35k this isn't for me. I haven't been in a car without heated seats in a long time, especially at this price point. I've also grown accustomed to turbo engines, so having to rev up a NA engine to merge and pass feels a bit dated. I can see why people buy these, they do pretty much everything well, but I don't get this "Adventure" trim. Driver's seat clip holding the seat cover to the seat frame was detached when I picked it up at 8k miles.

hpCa4Fx.jpeg


xeH3DS3.jpeg


UiyGj6a.jpeg


XrhlTD0.jpeg


gDQXDHp.jpeg


PsxN7yf.jpeg
 
The rubber seats are easy to clean after you got muddy getting it unstuck while adventuring. As 99.9% will never see a dirt road may be an unnecessary feature.

The rest of your report could have been about our 2014 RAV4.
 
Good review. It is what it is - a boring grocery getter family car. I would say your review is pretty spot on.

I assume the seats are softex, but the stitching looks way different than ours? I thought I would hate it, but I really like it. It doesn't get hot in the summer like leather, and it is super easy to clean. Vinyl is a good description - well a little softer.

The "Adventure" trim uses Toyota's torque vectoring AWD, which based on most youtube videos and reviews is pretty good - uses a viscous coupling and can put more power to the wheel with traction. The obvious limitation is the low ground clearance and terrible approach angle. Would probably push a little more snow than the standard model.

The other difference with the Advanture is it includes an engine oil cooler, so towing limits are I think 3500lbs? Vs 1800lbs with the standard model. And unfortunately the block where the oil cooler connects is different - on the standard model the hole and threaded bolt holes are not there - so you can't just add the OEM cooler. I looked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GON
I just test drove one with my sister on Saturday. I have to disagree that it is adequate space for 4 adults; maybe if you were under 5'5"?

Both my sister and I thought the interior was extremely cramped for a Compact CUV and it is off our list.
What are you comparing it too? None in that class are great. If you give more passenger space your cargo suffers. More in the front means less in the back. I found the CX5 much more cramped. The CR-V is a bit more spacious in front but I think the rear seats were less so. Everyone I suppose has a different set of needs.
 
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I'm just waiting for the time I can afford a RAV4 hybrid woodland. Or a Highlander hybrid. Of course I have owned hybrids for close to last 20 years. Maybe that's the difference.
 
In the RAV4 I rented I found the engine pretty thrashy at higher revs when pushed. But when merging or passing power wasn't required the engine was reasonably smooth and quiet.

Our RAV4-h has the thrash as well. Out of curiosity I started putting premium in it and the note improved to my ear. At 40mpg, I can feed it premium. My wife says she can’t hear a difference, BUT it gets about ever so slightly better mpg on premium, so I suspect it pulls timing and has a touch of ping on regular fuel.
 
What is with that seat trim sticking out all over the place?

I'd be willing to bet some lowlife with a RAV4 rented this, with the intent of swapping seat covers. But failed in the attempt. According to a family member that worked at a car rental agency, swapping interior trim and more, with their own lower trim level vehicle, was pretty common.
 
A turbo would make one of these really nice. My friend has a 2023 and I liked the powertrain, the transmission was chef’s kiss compared to the Tucson.
 
I just test drove one with my sister on Saturday. I have to disagree that it is adequate space for 4 adults; maybe if you were under 5'5"?

Both my sister and I thought the interior was extremely cramped for a Compact CUV and it is off our list.
The forester isn't much better, the outback is way better in the backseat and the turbo engine is nice.
 
The rubber seats are easy to clean after you got muddy getting it unstuck while adventuring. As 99.9% will never see a dirt road may be an unnecessary feature.

The rest of your report could have been about our 2014 RAV4.
The Adventure trim is marketed to the campers and light off road folks. It's the trim that I'd be looking at if I still fished and camped as much as I used to.
 
I'd be willing to bet some lowlife with a RAV4 rented this, with the intent of swapping seat covers. But failed in the attempt. According to a family member that worked at a car rental agency, swapping interior trim and more, with their own lower trim level vehicle, was pretty common.

There was no evidence anyone tried to swap parts, why wouldn't they just swap the entire seat?
 
Thieves aren't smart, or competent?

Exactly. So the seat falling apart points to poor engineering or a really fat previous renter. The latter good engineering should account for.
 
What are you comparing it too? None in that class are great. If you give more passenger space your cargo suffers. More in the front means less in the back. I found the CX5 much more cramped. The CR-V is a bit more spacious in front but I think the rear seats were less so. Everyone I suppose has a different set of needs.
I did not drive this RAV4. But Grand Highlander is very cramped compared to others in that class, especially Atlas. The third row and trunk are comparable. 1st and 2nd row? Class lower in size.
Sequoia is similar compared to other SUVs in that class, especially the trunk and third row.
I think there is a trend here.
 
Back
Top