2014 Impala

Status
Not open for further replies.
303 HP 3.6
at 2.5 and 2.4. It is in the article. I think the 2.5 is 192 and the 2.4 is 184. I didn't feel like looking at the article again.
 
Originally Posted By: hardcore302
Available engines?


From the article:

Quote:
Under the hood, the 2014 Chevrolet Impala gets a 2.4-liter four-cylinder eAssist mild hybrid setup with an estimated 182 horsepower, GM’s new 2.5-liter Ecotec engine that should make 195 horsepower, or the carryover 3.6-liter V-6 with 303 horsepower.
 
Originally Posted By: BigBuck
I would LOVE to see the comments by some of these people if this car was made by a Korean manufacturer.


There would be more positive comments and much more praise.
 
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
Originally Posted By: BigBuck
I would LOVE to see the comments by some of these people if this car was made by a Korean manufacturer.


There would be more positive comments and much more praise.

It is the way around here. I have stopped arguing at this palce because I get tired.
smile.gif
 
The shape of the hood is nearly identical to that of the Taurus. Even the head lights are very close in design. The mirrors, windows, and chrome trim around the windows are very similar too.

I'm not sure why that is such a controversial thing to say. The Impala is going for the exact same target market. Why wouldn't it look a little like its direct competitor?

I don't see anyone really bashing it either. Actually, the comments about the new Impala are almost universally good in this thread.
 
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl
The shape of the hood is nearly identical to that of the Taurus. Even the head lights are very close in design. The mirrors, windows, and chrome trim around the windows are very similar too.

I'm not sure why that is such a controversial thing to say. The Impala is going for the exact same target market. Why wouldn't it look a little like its direct competitor?

I don't see anyone really bashing it either. Actually, the comments about the new Impala are almost universally good in this thread.


One would argue (as has been done already) that the Taurus really lifted its front end from the old Acura front end. That style seems to be very popular right now and the Impala is no different. Other than a grill similarity though, I don't see much.
 
Yeah I see more Camaro and Cruze inspriration in the new Impala's styling than anything. Also the interior doesn't appear cheap at all to me as someone else said
21.gif
.
 
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
Originally Posted By: BigBuck
I would LOVE to see the comments by some of these people if this car was made by a Korean manufacturer.


There would be more positive comments and much more praise.


I doubt that, it would be more like how many other cars it copied...
 
It's a good-looking car. But GM's design language for their sedans seems a bit over-stretched on this new Impala. Kinda like they took a Malibu and puffed it up a bit.
 
Originally Posted By: 01rangerxl
The shape of the hood is nearly identical to that of the Taurus. Even the head lights are very close in design. The mirrors, windows, and chrome trim around the windows are very similar too.

I'm not sure why that is such a controversial thing to say. The Impala is going for the exact same target market. Why wouldn't it look a little like its direct competitor?

I don't see anyone really bashing it either. Actually, the comments about the new Impala are almost universally good in this thread.


Thank you!

Do you need glasses too?
48.gif
(Amazing how the defenders come out when someone is NOT bashing their brand)

It looks a lot like the Taurus once you take the rose colored glasses off. That was all I'm saying.

When the member that started bringing Korea in there is your bashing to the tee.
thumbsup2.gif


Good job guys!

Bill
 
Originally Posted By: mechanicx
Yeah I see more Camaro and Cruze inspriration in the new Impala's styling than anything. Also the interior doesn't appear cheap at all to me as someone else said
21.gif
.

Yes, Camaro styling blend is the first impression I had from looking at the top photo.
 
I had a 2008 with the 3.5L...pathetic rear seat room (but a huge trunk for those that carry more stuff than people), blown head gaskets at 65K (a known problem in the "improved" V6's they introduced in the 2006 Impala)and other issues with the car swore me off GM for the forseeable future. Maybe these new models will be better but each GM purchase I've made has been a disappointment as far as reliability...I'm not giving in to the hype anymore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom