2006 and newer Hondas - a disappointment

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
9,616
Location
Connecticut
My family has always had at least one Honda car in the driveway, and my mom has been driving Hondas since she started driving. I am in no way a Honda hater. I feel that somewhere during the 2006 model year, the build quality took a dive, and the service now is less than stellar.

My mom's first car was a 1986 Honda CRX. She literally drove it until the wheels fell off and it rusted away. It had close to 200k HARD miles on it when she traded it in. She then had a 1994 Civic that was also flawless. It ran great for 170k before she traded it in for a 2005 Civic. The 2005 Civic is now owned by my sister, has 140k miles on it, and has been great. All of these cars never needed more than basic maintenance items, and still ran well when sold/traded in. My mom now has a 2011 Fit. The car has about 27k miles on it, and the engine sounds like a clacking diesel. It honestly clacks louder than my (previous owner neglected) Jeep 4.0L. There have also been lots of little interior problems with it.

My GF has a 2007 Honda Civic with about 150k. This car is a nightmare. It has always been maintained, yet it hates life. The car has a stalling problem now that no dealership can seem to find. They've replaced sensors, cleaned wires, etc. The problem comes and goes. The car also rides terrible even with new OE struts and many of the parts on it seem cheaply made. Her engine also sounds like a clacking diesel, and the transmission has a bad hesitation going into 2nd gear.

A guy I work with has a 2006 Pilot 4WD. He only uses it to go back and forth to work, and bring his kids to practice. No towing or off roading. The car has just over 100k on it, and just last week a piston shattered. It has always been serviced at the local dealership.

Problems happen, bugs need to be worked out, new technology breeds the potential for glitches. The big problem I have with this whole thing is not so much the build quality issues, but the way Honda handles it. When my mom had her 2005 Civic she brought it in for service. They "aligned" the front end, but never test drove it. She returned home and told me the car pulled "a little bit". I took it for a test drive. The alignment was so bad, if I let go of the wheel I would've went straight off the road. Back to the dealer it went and they claimed "she probably hit a pothole on the way home". Back and forth she went with the dealer until the tech finally confessed he had forgot to test drive it.

Fast forward to her 2011 Fit, and a different Honda dealership. She had a loud vibration in the dash, so she took it into the dealer to have them look at it. While driving her car the dealer managed to pop a front tire, causing them to go off the road and scrape the wheel. They told my mom they drove the car "where they probably shouldn't have" (whatever that means) and that they would need it for another day to buff out the wheel. We went down there and there was no possible way they could simply "buff out" the giant gouge in the aluminum wheel. My dad had to argue with them to get a new wheel and tire. The dealership claimed that if we never wanted them to test drive for the noise, this whole situation wouldn't have happened.
confused2.gif
We took it to my buddy's independent shop after to get the whole underside examined for damage.

The guy I work with who had the engine blow in his Pilot had a warranty until 100k miles. He heard a faint ticking noise from the engine bay at around 80k miles. When in for service, he told them about it and asked them to look at it. They told him it was normal. One of his pistons shattered last week at 100,300 miles, just out of warranty. The cylinder wall is scored and they want him to buy a new engine on his dime. He told them that he was in previously a few times to have the noise diagnosed and they told him it was normal. Somehow that disappeared off the service records, and there is nothing saying he told them about an engine noise.
crazy.gif


He called Honda America and they basically told him to go pound sand. The dealership is now fighting the idea of him wanting to install a used engine, and he might have to have it towed to another shop in order to install a used engine. He asked Honda corporate if they would partially cover the cost of a new engine since they might want to find out what happened to this well taken care of motor. They told him they might if he paid the $800 diagnostic fee to take it apart, but even then there wouldn't be any guarantees. With 3 young kids and his wife being laid off, a new engine is not exactly something he can afford.

I find it interesting how Honda arrogantly depends so much on their reputation to sell their cars, yet they don't stand behind their products. Honda doesn't take care of its customers, so I think my family will not be buying another Honda product. I see so many people defending the Honda brand. Sure the older Hondas were dead reliable, but why defend a brand that surely won't defend you when you have a problem?
 
Is it a local dealership issue or car problem itself? Seems like bad dealers in what describe.

All cars have problems just how they are dealt with is what sticks with customer.
 
Originally Posted By: jeepman3071
I am in no way a Honda hater.


If you have to tell us you aren't "a hater" then your a hater.

Posting about the decline in quality 7 years ago?
Trolling.gif


"The guy I work with" "My GF" "My mom's"...how come they all didn't just buy Jeeps?

BTW, Do YOU even OWN a Honda?
 
Last edited:
This sounds more like dealership issues than a Honda product issue. Check out the 40+ page thread on the Pilot that ate its cams to see what dealership service can do to a Honda 3.5l VCM engine. That's why I'll be performing the service on our new Odyssey with equal or better products at more conservative intervals than the dealer would.

Maybe the Fit issues are more on Honda than the dealer, but that engine is known to be noisy.
 
Honda makes a good product. And the new one's are certainly much safer than the older ones. They keep track of their products quality and I would bet it's the best they've ever made. A few anecdotal stories really doesn't make any difference.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: threeputtpar
That's why I'll be performing the service on our new Odyssey with equal or better products at more conservative intervals than the dealer would.


^^ This is my thought with all makes.
 
I'm not a hater. I stated that because I don't want you to think I'm just bashing Honda. I work on many people's cars and have grown up around Hondas. The first vehicle I learned to drive on was mom's Honda. Don't get me started on Jeeps, I'll be the first to tell you that Chrysler has its issues. Jeeps are fun, but I wouldn't call them the most reliable. Its funny how people get mad at me for not even owning a Honda, when people who claim Hondas are reliable don't own one either.

The problem is not just dealerships. Yes the Fit may typically be a noisy engine, but engines shouldn't be this noisy when they have under 20k miles on them. That in my opinion is a build quality issue. I do like Honda cars. If I needed something for better gas mileage, or didn't need a 4x4 for the snow I'd consider a Honda. I still would consider one given the issues I've been involved with.

I think people have to drop their "this brand can do no wrong" loyalty. Its not only apparent with Honda but GM and other brands. I may drive a Jeep, but I certainly wouldn't buy many of their products. All I'm saying is people have to be careful when they recommend certain cars as "trouble free", "dead reliable", and "if you want the best buy a Honda". I see these very often and no brand is "the best" by any means. That was the main point of my original post and I can see how some people already got butthurt.
lol.gif
 
Originally Posted By: jeepman3071
I'm not a hater. I stated that because I don't want you to think I'm just bashing Honda. I work on many people's cars and have grown up around Hondas. The first vehicle I learned to drive on was mom's Honda. Don't get me started on Jeeps, I'll be the first to tell you that Chrysler has its issues. Jeeps are fun, but I wouldn't call them the most reliable. Its funny how people get mad at me for not even owning a Honda, when people who claim Hondas are reliable don't own one either.

The problem is not just dealerships. Yes the Fit may typically be a noisy engine, but engines shouldn't be this noisy when they have under 20k miles on them. That in my opinion is a build quality issue. I do like Honda cars. If I needed something for better gas mileage, or didn't need a 4x4 for the snow I'd consider a Honda. I still would consider one given the issues I've been involved with.

I think people have to drop their "this brand can do no wrong" loyalty. Its not only apparent with Honda but GM and other brands. I may drive a Jeep, but I certainly wouldn't buy many of their products. All I'm saying is people have to be careful when they recommend certain cars as "trouble free", "dead reliable", and "if you want the best buy a Honda". I see these very often and no brand is "the best" by any means. That was the main point of my original post and I can see how some people already got butthurt.
lol.gif



Hmm, I'm guessing bathsalts?
 
I'll stick with a Chrysler 2.2,head gaskets are cheap,and the engine is so easy to work on anybody could do it.And I wont have to worry about fighting for any warranty claims,25 years is sort of out of warranty.
I know a guy who bought a 1984 Corolla FWD sedan from California,drove it to New England,and within 6 months it started to bubble rust everywhere.He literally replaced every part at least once,in the 2 years he had it,including the carb and whole engine...eventually the underbody rot got so bad,it wouldnt pass inspection.Its now in the junkpile.Gee,a Toyota that can last 27
 
I'll counter with:

Hondas have always been mediocre cars. They have a fun to drive aura and people that bought them generally kept up with the maintenance. So that alone explained the "better reliability" rather than a genuine quality gap. I've been in a few of those older Hondas and they were nothing special and certainly had issues, just like everyone else.

I think now people are buying Hondas, not taking care of them (or the quality is not that great) and they are failing just like everyone else. Or there are genuine defects *COUGH* HONDA TRANSMISSIONS *COUGH*.

And BTW, I'm not impressed with that 200k Honda you spoke about. I had an 86 Mustang 2.3L that had 175k on the original engine and transmission, only reason it went to the boneyard was rust, and that was in 2005. And it was not a fluke, also inherited an 87 Escort that I got 125k out of before I traded it in (it had no AC and I wanted a new car after graduating college).

The take away is - Honda is overrated and everyone has issues.
 
I'll stick with a Chrysler 2.2,head gaskets are cheap,and the engine is so easy to work on anybody could do it.And I wont have to worry about fighting for any warranty claims,25 years is sort of out of warranty.
I know a guy who bought a 1984 Corolla FWD sedan from California,drove it to New England,and within 6 months it started to bubble rust everywhere.He literally replaced every part at least once,in the 2 years he had it,including the carb and whole engine...eventually the underbody rot got so bad,it wouldnt pass inspection.Its now in the junkpile.Gee,a Toyota that can last 27 years in Cali,but 2 years in New England kills it....maybe thats why all these old Hondas,Toyotas are still around...they avoid the worst weather in the world.I have seen 3 year old Hyundais with severe body rust....so,I think if it wasnt for powertrain durability (or percieved durability),the Japanese wouldnt rate any better than anyone else.
 
I hate to hear of your experience. I think people defend what they know. I know of nobody, Honda fan boy or not, who would defend Honda if they got treated like that.

We were treated like that by another company. We had a 2007 model minivan that we so much enjoyed, but we just couldn't keep it out of the dealership. After many difficult dealings with different dealers and the automaker, we decided to cut our ties (and now actually have two Honda products). If Honda treated us like they treated your family, I wouldn't buy 'em either. So far, they've treated us very well, so it's what I know at this point. The other company treated us poor (dealers and 800 number), so we won't be trying one of those for a long time.

And everybody has the same story with a different name. Whether it's a Honda or a Toyota, or a Ford or a GM, or a Chrysler or a Nissan (or anything else). Most people out there have great experiences with all of these companies (or they wouldn't be in business). A few will have negative experiences with all of these companies. We've all got different experiences, and I think that spice adds a lot of flavor to life.
 
I'm confused -- you have some lazy/bad dealer techs and the reasonable conclusion is that Honda itself sucks?
 
Solution? Buy old Hondas with a manual transmission. I'm on my fourth - 1991, 1988, 1993 and 2003.
 
Originally Posted By: rshaw125


Hmm, I'm guessing bathsalts?


Oh yeah, you guessed it. A person who thinks customer service matters? I MUST be high on something.
smirk.gif
33.gif



My issues are not with the dealership. Yes the dealers around here suck, but that is not the point. The point is the attitude from Honda Corporate SUCKS, and that also is reflected through the service at the dealerships. If Honda Corporate held dealerships to a higher standard, it wouldn't be as big of an issue. You can read all over Honda car forums about people having the same issues.

I've heard of people having transmissions replaced under warranty in Honda vans after the warranty had been expired for a little bit. This was years ago, but now they don't seem to give a [censored] about the customer. That bugs me, not the small issues friends and family have had with their vehicles. My point is that everyone thinks Hondas are so great while in fact they are just like everyone else. Chrysler is known for its lack of customer service. Calling Chrysler corporate about an issue is almost a joke.

The problem is not just Hondas, its brand loyalty and ignorance. Don't be silly, the greedy corporate world is not out to make you happy.
 
The issue with early Honda 5-speed automatics has been fixed properly with a *recall*

I've always had good luck with my Hondas. My civic has no issues (granted it burns a bit of oil), and my Accord sees tons of track time and has yet to have anything break or fail.

Granted... these are all previous 2006 models. But I have never talked to someone who complains about the newer ones.
 
Personally, I would never buy a Honda, but you do realize that the Fit is like their cheapest form of a car, and that one needs to have appropriate expectations from such a thing. I.E.- You probably got what you paid for. And if you don't like it, you can always sell it.
 
I don't get it...are you posting to get people to confirm that your opinion is indeed fact, or looking for people to argue with?

Yep, I'm one of those satisfied Honda owners. Bought several of them new and none has seen the inside of a dealership while I owned them, therefore I can't comment on dealer "service."
 
I just did some searches for some of these topics:

Vehicle dependability:
http://autos.jdpower.com/ratings/dependability-press-release.htm
Honda better than average. Looks pretty good.

Sales satisfaction rating:
http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&story=csrSsi&subject=csr
Honda just below average. Not so good.

Service customer rating (customer's rating of their service dept):
http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp?section=top&subject=csr&story=csrCsi
HOnda just at average. Not so good.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top