This is very interesting because of the number of samples. It does seem as though the RLI is generating less wear. More interesting is the comparison between the Dyson and Blackstone numbers. It's a very good illustration that they are not directly comparable, as has been said before.
However, the Blackstone numbers are fairly consistent among themselves, and I don't see the cost of the Dyson analysis ($60?) being justified for a car that does not have problems or special requirements. A Blackstone analysis every 10k or so is much easier to justify as a cost effective maintenance aid.
My humble opinion, of course.