2 Oil Sumps, 1 for cams, 1 for main bearings

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
831
Location
Colorado
If we had a split oil sump (2 oil pumps), one sump fed the valvetrain and timing chain areas, and the other sump fed the piston ring and crank bearing areas (near combustion), what oil would be best for the valvetrain one, and what oil for the crankshaft bearing one?

Would the valvetrain one be higher viscosity, more EP additives, for example?
Would the valvetrain one have very long OCIs?
 
There is a thread on here somewhere discussing separate sumps on huge marine engines. From memory, the crank bearings somehow are separate from the cylinders and the fill is lifetime.
 
Interesting question...

When I was at University, and we were studying engine lubrication, my lecturer was a proponent for separate compartments and lubricants for the bearings and the pistons.

Multigrade for the crank and bearings, and 30 straight for the pistons and rings...sort of makes sense when you see some of the ring seal studies.

Now you really need three...one for the valvetrain too !!!
 
Originally Posted By: ledslinger
There is a thread on here somewhere discussing separate sumps on huge marine engines. From memory, the crank bearings somehow are separate from the cylinders and the fill is lifetime.


The big diesel engines are crosshead design (crank and rods act on a rod, with the piston at the top, so the piston has no sideways thrust)...the piston compartment can be fairly readily sealed, and the piston sprays and cooling sprays recycled.

That way, the pistons and area that are prone to blow-by from high sulfur fuels can have ridiculously high TBNs, which would otherwise be not good for bearings and the rest of the engine
 
Thanks, I had no idea this has ever been attempted. I'll bet many of us "invented" this in our heads over the years when thinking about what tribology we want for cams vs. stuff near the combustion chamber.

I'd think the old Fiat SOHC cams in an oil bath might overheat, not sure, but that seems to be a good way to go to separate cam oil properties from piston/rings/crank oil properties. Assuming it was ez enough to change the Cam Oil up there in the "attic", and how long it would last. Also, having a bath there eliminates the need for a second oil pump.

Anyway, a fellow I know that works for GM hinted (leaked?) at an SAE meeting that this will be done soon. Can't wait to see that. It looks like some engine folks are dissatisfied with oil properties compromised to work over the entire engine, with vastly different boundary oil conditions.
 
Last edited:
On the other end of the spectrum, aren't there some motorcycles that have a shared engine oil and transmission lube sump?
 
Originally Posted By: TallPaul
On the other end of the spectrum, aren't there some motorcycles that have a shared engine oil and transmission lube sump?


A lot of them - that is why most of the foreign manufacturers spec a JASO MA/MA2 oil. The oil has higher initial coefficient of friction than modern PCMOs with all their friction modifiers. This ensures the ensure proper clutch engagement without slipping/glazing.

Why stop at two sumps? Get the most robust oil for the piston/rings with what we consider a "normal OCI", then run bearings with a synthetic fluid (maybe trans fluid) and the valvetrain with a synthetic gear lube.
 
And to think I brought up separate lubrication for a turbo and it generally got panned as being too complicated even if it would make sense from a pure protection standpoint. I think the rationale was that it would either be a "lifetime fluid" that really wasn't, sealed grease bearings that would eventually have to be replaced once they failed/leaked, or that there would be a change interval that would be ignored.

And again - what's wrong with greased bearings? I'm used to sealed cartridge bearings from my days with bicycles. They were smooth and pretty much lasted forever.
 
With the advent of ceramics and electronic / electric and pneumatic valve control, I see separate lube for top and bottom a real possibility. Once you remove a mechanical connection from top to bottom of the engine, I see separate lube systems a real possibility. As of now, the best engine configuration for such a system would be an OHC engine with a timing belt.

Okay here's my hypothesis: 5W50 for the head, 5W20 for the block. Just to muddy the waters.

OCI for the head would be twice as long
 
Seperating the cam and the crankcase oil would be easy. Seperating the crank from the pistons would be hard. That would mean a split seal on each rod and journal.
 
Originally Posted By: FetchFar
Thanks, I had no idea this has ever been attempted. I'll bet many of us "invented" this in our heads over the years when thinking about what tribology we want for cams vs. stuff near the combustion chamber.

I'd think the old Fiat SOHC cams in an oil bath might overheat, not sure, but that seems to be a good way to go to separate cam oil properties from piston/rings/crank oil properties. Assuming it was ez enough to change the Cam Oil up there in the "attic", and how long it would last. Also, having a bath there eliminates the need for a second oil pump.

Anyway, a fellow I know that works for GM hinted (leaked?) at an SAE meeting that this will be done soon. Can't wait to see that. It looks like some engine folks are dissatisfied with oil properties compromised to work over the entire engine, with vastly different boundary oil conditions.



Interesting comment from GM. With belts, it's easy to imagine, however with chains, how will they do it? Group the chain and head into one 'oil case' and the rest into another? I can see the chain shaft being used as a head oil drain perhaps, and the head oil pickup being at the crank sprocket area (sealed from the rest of the crankcase).

Originally Posted By: Shannow
Interesting question...

When I was at University, and we were studying engine lubrication, my lecturer was a proponent for separate compartments and lubricants for the bearings and the pistons.

Multigrade for the crank and bearings, and 30 straight for the pistons and rings...sort of makes sense when you see some of the ring seal studies.

Now you really need three...one for the valvetrain too !!!


I remember an old chart comparing wear rates between different types of oils in an old MB OM, the straight 30 provided the best ring protection vs multigrades at, wait for it, wait for it, cold start!

Originally Posted By: FetchFar

Would the valvetrain one be higher viscosity, more EP additives, for example?
Would the valvetrain one have very long OCIs?


1: yes
2: yes

May do something like this in the future, because there is a SOHC engine with a taller deck height that I want to use a DOHC head on; same gasket pattern except for the oil drainback holes. Was thinking of closing the drain holes on head and block, sealing the head feed jet, and refeeding the head with an external pump and it's own oil case, with the head drainback channels tapped into for an oil return.
r
Ideally, I'd use high viscosity for the valvetrain, ie 40 grade, with minimal artificial viscosity spread (ie un-VMed, high-VI base oil), and the additive pack of a race oil, no need for over-basing (TBN) as combustion gasses are not expected to contact the 'head oil' (barring bad stem seals), and allowing the add pack to work more effectively. Straining and magnetic filtration inline.

Bottom end sees a lot of windage and high-speed friction (rings). I'd be keen to use a low- to non-artificially VMed 30 grade (turbo), or 20 grade (NA), with high VI base stocks and a standard, based addpack. Crankcase ventilation to be tapped at the top of closed oil return passages and fed to air intake.
 
If you had external cooling lines for the head separate from the block, the only purpose for a head gasket would be for compression seal. They could be simple rings as found on air cooled automotive motors such as VW and Corvair.
 
About time.

The piston/crank area is a filthy place to be if you are oil...If you separate it from the rest of the engine, then you really only have to replace the piston/crank oil regularly. The other oil system could probably be "sealed for life" like the newer transmissions.

Heck, You could probably replace the engine coolant with the same oil used to lub the chain/cam. The upper-end oil could be used as engine coolant as well
shocked.gif
No?

Is that what GM is doing? It would make sense.
 
Last edited:
If you see anyone developing a "scotch yolk" system (and there are trials on Subaru Boxers in Oz), you can pretty well guarantee that they want a seperate compartment for pistons etc.

(that, or the advantages of a super long rod ratio in a compact package.
 
Originally Posted By: TallPaul
On the other end of the spectrum, aren't there some motorcycles that have a shared engine oil and transmission lube sump?
On my Harley Electra Glide it has three sumps. One for the engine one for the trans and one for the clutch and primary chain. Six quarts when doing all three at service time. Not all are serviced at the same interval though.
 
The idea of further dividing oil sumps would work well in Subaru transaxles, too. Synchromesh for the manual gears, and a seperate area for hypoid gear set and GL-5 EP oil.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom