You showed an image of two hoses, one swollen and the other not. I am supposed to disregard it. Again, it's your photo, am I supposed to not notice the difference?
The difference is usually not quite that extreme. Also, I made an additional post about how when you look around your engine bay even swollen hoses can somehow look better than they really are because if all the hoses are equally swollen your basis for comparison is going to be other swollen hoses. I'd have to think that hoses that are swollen get larger in diameter and length makes them weaker since (presumably) the hose itself gets thinner, or at least less dense.
Around 1.5 - 2 years ago I swapped out some ~17 and ~24 year old hoses (some OE Ford and some aftermarket Goodyear Branded) while I was doing a head gasket change. I was amazed at how much even the "newer" of these hoses had swollen when compared to brand new hoses. But looking at them installed in the car before the HG changeout, you would never know, as they looked perfectly fine. They
mostly even looked OK from the inside of the hoses, but I'm not sure that I would trust hoses that old that were stressed out by a HG failure that leaked exhaust into the cooling system.
I know that cooling system hoses used to be a more regular PM several decades ago (like in the 70's), and that basically people stopped doing that. That's because for
most people (maybe not BITOG types) coolant hoses typically outlasted their term of ownership of the vehicle. But if you are doing work on the cooling system anyway on an old car that already has high mileage and planning on keeping the vehicle for a while, it might be prudent PM, especially if the vehicle is still used on long trips.