We tend to be somewhat overly critical of Russian armament and aircraft. Using words like "cheap", and "subpar", etc. The AK-47 is constantly knocked and criticized in this manner. It's often called a, "cheap stamped metal bullet hose".
Russians do things differently. They tend to design around doing one specific thing. Then build that unit as cheaply and rugged as possible...... And build A LOT of them. They don't often embrace the term, "multi role".
...
No. The Soviets had some world class, excellent examples of aviation. The Mig-21, Su-27, and the aircraft that followed like the Mig-29 were mostly good though sometimes limited by Western standards on things like range, endurance or avionics. This aircraft has a bad reputation unlike the others mentioned. It was cheap in that it was affordable and offered Third World countries certain capabilities. But its troublesome design became apparent in sustained conflicts...