I dont understand the odd wordy linux comment. My son at 14 has installed a few variations of Linux in the past few weeks.
You are giving management too much credit for what AI is and isnt today.
You need to be able to understand loading features from a Linux repository to be able to implement the features in your first screenshot, for example, Google Translate libraries. The average rank and file business person has never touched Linux. The average line of business manager does not keep up with technology and wouldn't have a clue where to start. It is indeed not very difficult if you are technology minded, the syntax on the CLI is different as compared to Windows, but it's fairly standardized and not difficult to learn.
I never give managers too much credit. One thing I've realized as I've gotten older is that there are very few talented managers, directors and execs in this world. Additionally, the larger the organization gets, the less likely they are to have cross-divisional knowledge. The boomers in the C suite want AI, but they have no idea how to get there, at least in my experience.
Most software vendor sales organizations that call on me are using it more as a catch phrase to get management attention than an actual, implementable feature that produces tangible benefits.
So again, back to your original statements about AI replacing developers, I disagree. It may replace some developers, because it will make good developers more efficient at their jobs, you know that old mantra about "doing more with less", well AI may enable more work to be done with less developers. It's not ever going to completely replace developers during my career, to give that time line, in the next 10-12 years, because it's just wrong too often.
How often is your example of automating the translation of French to English going to be wrong? Google Translate is not perfect in conveying meaning. I don't think most people probably use it as much as I do, having a wife and in-laws that are native Portuguese speakers, to give one example. It's gotten better but it's not like having a person that is fluent in both languages.
And, like I said before, you need context in order to be able to ask the correct questions of AI. Not sure how you do that without having a human that understands the big picture.