That's why I added that one to my list of "complaints".The honour for that one goes to Honda, their 1.5L is arguably the biggest offender out there.
It has been fixed. This has been discussed on here in depth.Hoping doing 3,000 mile OCI's with a good oil/filter will help with that if they have not fixed it. If they are failing due to soot from GDI, then I'd think it would help.
This applies to diesel engines, which has been the case since diesel fuel was invented. Are you saying that it applies to gas engines as well?
That has happened many times in the past. The biggest, and perhaps most notorious, resulted from the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs. Some major volcanic eruptions have done likewise, but on a smaller scale, of course.What's that have to do with carbon deposits in the engine? Or are you referring to cans of black spray paint? I'd think black particles released into the atmosphere would block the sun and cause global cooling.
Soot loading is definitely a new issue in gasoline engines, that was introduced with GDI.This applies to diesel engines, which has been the case since diesel fuel was invented. Are you saying that it applies to gas engines as well?
I'm familiar with Toyota and perhaps Ford? What other mfgs are using dual injection systems?Let's not forget that manufacturers have been adding PFI back and many engines use dual-fuel delivery systems that have both GDI and PFI.
Huh. That must be why Mercedes went with up to 5 injections per power stroke. Better mixing/atomization.Soot loading is definitely a new issue in gasoline engines, that was introduced with GDI.
Is the stuff coming from a tailpipe an aerosol?The contribution of black carbon aerosols into the atmosphere will lead to a measurable increase in solar radiation and ultimately be a major contributor to global warming.
It seemed like a good idea while the guys were sitting at the bar but it's something that isn't delivering the promises. Who knows, maybe it was all planned from the beginning in order to give another argument to support the cessation of the internal combustion engine and promote the EV promise. If you can't believe your own eyes then what can you believe?
Might have more to do with the rich starting mixture. You know, kinda like full choke, but only for a second or two. Still has to be better in the long run.I'm familiar with Toyota and perhaps Ford? What other mfgs are using dual injection systems?
Does a dual injection system mitigate the problem originally posted?
the smoke on startup baffles me. This is cleaner and more efficient? I see so many GM products emit a black diesel like cloud on cold start-up (is that an actual problem to any degree)? And there's the allusion to soot particles getting into the atmosphere ...
Yes, an aerosol is defined as a colloidal suspension of particles dispersed in air or gas.Is the stuff coming from a tailpipe an aerosol?
Would a volcanic eruption then be considered an aerosol? Both tailpipe emissions and eruptions are particles dispersed in air or gas.Yes, an aerosol is defined as a colloidal suspension of particles dispersed in air or gas.
I'd say so, yes - chemically speaking. The tail pipe emissions would be considered anthropogenic, or, man created. The volcanic eruption would not.Would a volcanic eruption then be considered an aerosol? Both tailpipe emissions and eruptions are particles dispersed in air or gas.
Because on the highway and at operating temperature they're much more efficient. GDI engines can run very lean and at much higher compression ratios (I've heard of them running as lean as 80:1) during steady cruising without blowing up the engine. Being able to delay injection until right before the plug fires is what enables this, with port injection fuel must be injected with the intake stroke, running a lean mixture on an engine with an 11:1 or greater CR with PFI would lead to catastrophic engine knock.Right.
But please read my post. Why the flocking to sooty GDI?