Which filter for '05 Nissan 2.5l

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: jk_636
Oh when will this insanity end?


When you stop shilling defective oil filters.
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: jk_636
Oh when will this insanity end?


When you stop shilling defective oil filters.
smile.gif



I haven't ever shilled anything. And have you ever seen me with any report of defect in any of my filters? Of course not. I'm not the ultimate authority, but between the members here, I would wager that I am one of the few active members that consistently use Purolator products and post them here for all to see.

You and your Fram folks portray Purolators as boogey men, just waiting to explode around ever corner. As if the problem is so widespread, anyone using them should be shamed, tarred and feathered. I'm still waiting on a failure. According to your propaganda, I should have had 10 failed filters by now. Why haven't I? Please inform me and the rest of the World Wide Web that if Purolators are an imminent and ever present danger, why have I never experienced anything less than a product that works as advertised? I don't want deflection or useless rhetoric, just a simple answer to a simple question????
 
Last edited:
The Purolator filters are questionable by documentation, not just tearing either, adbv's have been defective. All I see on Fram Ultra are some unproven stories typed out on a message board. They seem to always attack and then disappear, leaving the rumor to run.
 
Originally Posted By: jk_636
Originally Posted By: ZeeOSix
Originally Posted By: jk_636
Oh when will this insanity end?


When you stop shilling defective oil filters.
smile.gif



I haven't ever shilled anything.


Here's just a few comments in various threads from you in the last few days ... and this isn't shilling?
crackmeup2.gif


Originally Posted By: jk_636

-- The Pureone will provide superior filtration and for 3k miles it will be absolutely fine for use. These filters are just fine.

-- Keep using Purolators. Don't let the hysteria get a hold of you!! Pureone for sure.

-- The OCOD looks like [censored] because they are built like [censored]. Nothing new here. There is a reason it earned the name orange can of death. You will be much happier with the build quality of the P1.

-- Purolator is doing just fine and there products are still as good as they have always been.

-- They are still fine. There never was any concrete evidence that a problem ever existed. All that you will find are members who engaged in mass hysteria, where the only admissible and "credible" evidence were photos of pictures that "failed" and photos of those that didn't were nothing more than lucky or exceptions to the rule. Purolator has been the go to filter for many here (myself included) for years. Use with confidence. Dollar for dollar pound for pound, I would say the pureone is the best all around option, but pick some up and let us know what you think!!
 
More deflection. As I expected in my last post above.

Just answer the question. It's just that simple right?

You should be in politics. It isn't about being wrong so much as it is making sure your opponent can't be viewed as correct.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: jk_636
More deflection. As I expected in my last post above.

Just answer the question. It's just that simple right?

You should be in politics. It isn't about being wrong so much as it is making sure your opponent can't be viewed as correct.



One thing at a time ... I had to respond to that ridiculous claim that you don't shill up Purolators. Yeah, riiiight ...
wink.gif


Originally Posted By: jk_636
Please inform me and the rest of the World Wide Web that if Purolators are an imminent and ever present danger, why have I never experienced anything less than a product that works as advertised? I don't want deflection or useless rhetoric, just a simple answer to a simple question????


Because you are lucky ... you better go buy a lottery ticket! You and most here know there have been plenty of people who have experienced torn Purolators ... some even had more than one instance. And so far, there has been no real indicator that the problem has been permanently fixed.

But it's my feeling that you will not be using any Classics or PureOnes either in the future because you do know there is a chance of getting one that could tear. Instead you use the full synthetic for this very reason (ie, in your signature). At least there's a sliver of logic going on there.
thumbsup2.gif
 
I use synthetics because I went to longer OCIs, not because of any inherent fear of tears. And I may go back to pure ones and drop my OCIs because I have switched to 90% city driving. Either way, it has nothing to do with luck. If you really think luck is the deciding factor, then perhaps you should just find a hobby other than mechanics. Maybe something like bingo would be a better fit.
 
Originally Posted By: jk_636
And I may go back to pure ones and drop my OCIs because I have switched to 90% city driving. Either way, it has nothing to do with luck.


Sure it does ... and good luck with that! LoL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom