What’s this? A Fram with Louvers?

Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
6,138
Location
Parts Unknown
EE47A01E-8304-4D50-B230-06D1B8EDE276.webp

546111D7-BCAD-4012-A577-77F715943D88.webp

888DC92B-FD5E-41BC-9436-9B7B5E36055C.webp


Went to Wally World for some bug removing washer fluid…. So I stopped by the oil filters
 
Made the 4th day of 2023 ... so pretty new filter. Looks like Fram is jumping on the centertube louver train.
 
At least one other Fram filter anecdote using louvers has been posted HERE before.

As accurately noted, Fram's FB sister company Champ Labs has been using louvered tubes for a long time.

If pattern follows seems those preferring or only wanting to use filters with tube with holes will have to jump off the Fram train. On the plus side, the louvered orange can does show it has an orange silicone adbv, as advertised.
 
Last edited:
I feel as though there must be a materials or manufacturing advantage to louvered center tubes. Because you know it's not going to be for the benefit of performance if costs is a factor. 😂 In my mind, if you're able to recycle the slugs from punching circular holes in the center tube, you'd save more metal and lower costs, but what do I know?
 
I feel as though there must be a materials or manufacturing advantage to louvered center tubes. Because you know it's not going to be for the benefit of performance if costs is a factor. 😂 In my mind, if you're able to recycle the slugs from punching circular holes in the center tube, you'd save more metal and lower costs, but what do I know?
Yeah - the “processing” might be more than the worth of the slugs - and don’t want “hanging chads” 😷

I have cut plenty - they always look better once opened up …
 
I feel as though there must be a materials or manufacturing advantage to louvered center tubes. Because you know it's not going to be for the benefit of performance if costs is a factor. 😂 In my mind, if you're able to recycle the slugs from punching circular holes in the center tube, you'd save more metal and lower costs, but what do I know?
Louvers are much easier to punch. To make holes you have to punch out the slug (the metal that used to be where the hole is). If the slug doesn't eject correctly it can damage the die or material. Bunch of other technical things that make the die more difficult to make and maintain.

So yes, louvers are likely cheaper, or easier at least.
 
Louvers are much easier to punch. To make holes you have to punch out the slug (the metal that used to be where the hole is). If the slug doesn't eject correctly it can damage the die or material. Bunch of other technical things that make the die more difficult to make and maintain.

So yes, louvers are likely cheaper, or easier at least.
That makes sense. I figured there had to be a simple reason like this one.
 
Louvers are much easier to punch. To make holes you have to punch out the slug (the metal that used to be where the hole is). If the slug doesn't eject correctly it can damage the die or material. Bunch of other technical things that make the die more difficult to make and maintain.

So yes, louvers are likely cheaper, or easier at least.
Perfect timing on the answer. I was wondering what the benefit of the louvers over holes was. Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom