What New Car or SUV ??

Status
Not open for further replies.
Originally Posted By: rudolphna
So if we go by your line of thought, then we will start having our cars, airplanes, everything built in china, indonesia. Is this what you want?


That is not what I wrote, that is what you want to read through it, that is different.
I have just written: "Let the best win". That is not one of the Americans mojo: Free market, full liberalism, no control of any sort.
By applying imports taxes and buy american rules, you put controls by the governments in your everyday life, things that so many people contest here. Quite strange, no?

Originally Posted By: rudolphna
So we have even HIGHER unemployment HERE IN THE US/Canada because nothing is made here, and everything is outsourced. There will be jobs left in some service industries, but nothing else. Yup sounds good to me. 25%+ unemployment, anyone?


That is what populists try to put in your mind, but if you read more economics papers, you will see that these people just try to fool you to get your votes.
Only education will save modern countries: That would be good for our economies but will bring some inconvenients on others sectors, like questioning why they did these choices (answer: for their own benefits of course), so they prefer take the money, ruin their countries, and run.

You know, not everything is made in low cost countries... for now, and if you want to avoid that, you will have to change your way of living, before it is too late.

Right now, it is the Walmart way of economy: You don't pay stuff (made in other countries) that much, and since it is cheaper, you can pay people even less, so they have to buy cheap stuff, and you continue the circle of poverty. In the end, it is Walmart (US company, so that is OK, right) who win, pulling both side of strings towards its pockets, all the others lose (low cost employees get even less money out of their jobs, and here we become less richer by the minute).

The thing is not to lower your quality of job to compete against something you cannot win against (low cost countries with poor quality products), but to increase the quality of your products to show your difference and make it more valuable than the cheap ones. For that you need education to change the way people see global economy (see long term gain and loss of their choices instead of just the short term gain).

When I was younger (and living in Europe), when something was broken, it was more economical to repair it than to buy a new one (think iron, washing machine, stuff like that).
Last year, my two year old iron broke (probably a solder or thyristor went wrong), and the only solution the vendor offered me was to buy a new one, I could not even make it repaired if I wanted, no more choice. This part of the economy is gone. When it is broken, your neighbor cannot repair it for you, you HAVE to go buy another cheap one and help the low cost economy to grow.
That is in this type of situation that you know your economy went too far and it may be too late to change our faith.

Originally Posted By: rudolphna
I think the only countries that should be exempt from US import taxes are Canada, the UK, France, Germany, and a few other european countries.


You know that is not the case right now, right? Think Canadian wood, French wine and cheese, etc...
By creating this protectionism, lots of people in Canada and Europe have lost/will lose their jobs.
If they do the same on their side, it will be the same in the US and the only one who will survive will be the one playing the cheapest route through low cost countries (he can survive some taxes (he will just lower the salaries) where some other countries cannot do).

I am not sure to explain it correctly as English is not my born language, and it is a complicated matter (and it is may be a little bit too political for BITOG too).
I just want you go out there and read some papers about that subject, it may alter your way of seeing things (I see already that you incorporated the Honda/Toyota made in the US in your protectionist speech which is a change from few months ago).

More education doesn't hurt anyone who is willing to improve (that is why I come here and read a lot everyday), it is good to challenge ourselves to make us better.
Those who think they know everything are the ones who won't go far.
 
Originally Posted By: rudolphna

So if we go by your line of thought, then we will start having our cars, airplanes, everything built in china, indonesia. Is this what you want?

If they're the ones that can do it best, then so be it. Buy something because it is the best, not because your neighbor makes it. If you do the latter, you are only hurting him in the long run by giving him a false sense of security and stopping him from innovating and striving to be the best.

I refuse to buy products that don't meet my needs/requirements just because they are "made in USA", which is what the US auto industry was cranking out for years. Now they finally turned things around (well, Ford at least). Imagine if people just kept on buying the mediocre Tauruses in the 80s, Ford would have just kept on producing them "as is". It's the fact that people stopped buying them that helped Ford realize that they need to make some changes and catch up with the competition. It's sad that it took them so long, but better late than never.

Quote:

So we have even HIGHER unemployment HERE IN THE US/Canada because nothing is made here, and everything is outsourced.

Not if the US can make it best. And if the US can't, then the US shouldn't be making it in the first place. US should find their competitive advantage in other fields, such as science and technology. That of course requires significant changes in education and re-education in this country, but the world is changing so quickly nowadays that you can't expect to just stop learning after you get out of school and expect to be set for life.
 
Last edited:
Don't confuse "best" with "cheapest".
China can make almost everything cheaper than we can, if we took away our labour and environmental laws we could probably beat China on price. But how many people from countries with decent evironmental and human rights are immigrating to China? Who wants to live in industrial China once they've lived in N. America?
I don't really know what the answer is for levelling the playing field but if you can buy local do it. Sending your cash to China for communist party to play with isn't really in our nations best interests.
For a capitalist economy to send all its capital offshore doesn't sound like a good longterm plan to me... But I'm no economist.
 
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
But how many people from countries with decent evironmental and human rights are immigrating to China? Who wants to live in industrial China once they've lived in N. America?

You would be surprised at the figure: Way more than you think.
Why? More money of course.
They just said in the news that oil companies are closing their refineries in N.A. to open bigger ones in more "environmentally friendly" countries. Who do you think will run them? You need specialized people for that.
In my wife's company, they asked if people were OK to go to China for one year to train Chinese do their own work... for a nice salary and everything paid over there. They had a lot of responses for that offer.

Originally Posted By: IndyIan
I don't really know what the answer is for levelling the playing field but if you can buy local do it. Sending your cash to China for communist party to play with isn't really in our nations best interests.
For a capitalist economy to send all its capital offshore doesn't sound like a good longterm plan to me... But I'm no economist.

Since when China is communist? they moved from communism to hardcore capitalism several decades ago when they saw they could make more money out of their people like that.
Wikipedia:"Communism is a social structure in which classes are abolished and property is commonly controlled..." that is not the case anymore (I believe it never was the case but I could be wrong).

Like a french humorist used to say: "Capitalism is use of one man for the profit of another, communism is the contrary".
 
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
Don't confuse "best" with "cheapest".

Not confusing it at all. Price is an integral part of the product/service, which means it is taken into consideration when deciding what's "best" for me, or anyone else. Another word, "best" is something that meets my needs/requirements at a price that I'm willing to pay.
 
Originally Posted By: Pesca
Originally Posted By: IndyIan
But how many people from countries with decent evironmental and human rights are immigrating to China? Who wants to live in industrial China once they've lived in N. America?

You would be surprised at the figure: Way more than you think.
Why? More money of course.
They just said in the news that oil companies are closing their refineries in N.A. to open bigger ones in more "environmentally friendly" countries. Who do you think will run them? You need specialized people for that.
In my wife's company, they asked if people were OK to go to China for one year to train Chinese do their own work... for a nice salary and everything paid over there. They had a lot of responses for that offer.

Originally Posted By: IndyIan
I don't really know what the answer is for levelling the playing field but if you can buy local do it. Sending your cash to China for communist party to play with isn't really in our nations best interests.
For a capitalist economy to send all its capital offshore doesn't sound like a good longterm plan to me... But I'm no economist.

Since when China is communist? they moved from communism to hardcore capitalism several decades ago when they saw they could make more money out of their people like that.
Wikipedia:"Communism is a social structure in which classes are abolished and property is commonly controlled..." that is not the case anymore (I believe it never was the case but I could be wrong).

Like a french humorist used to say: "Capitalism is use of one man for the profit of another, communism is the contrary".

Still no one from "here" wants to live over there for more than temporary work/money. Unless you like heavy metals in your air, food, and water?

You can't seriously believe that oil companies are building refineries in places with more regulations to keep them from polluting?
Building new "dirty" industries in environmental regulation vacuums like China makes sense to their shareholders but building a clean refinery here would be better for our economy. Canada especially ships out raw materials at a loss only to have them processed and sold back to us. Sure we might save 2% on gas refined in China, but is it a good idea to not only be dependent on off shore oil but also the ability to refine it?

I'm no expert in the government of China but my suspiscion is that they are guiding their "free market" for their nations benefit. Over here our private free market has very little concern to anything other than the next quarters numbers? But China is buying all sorts of metals and resources that doesn't make financial sense for our private companies to buy, but for China's long term industrial growth its good to trade US monopoly money for real assets, and not chase paper gains.

I think China is going to win the space race and become a technological world leader, funded by the US consumer, enabled by multinational companies pushing for free markets. I don't think its a great idea for a dictatorship to run the most of the worlds business but I think thats where its heading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom