To be honest no one will have an answer unless you're an engineer on the inside but that doesn't stop us from speculating like we always do.
Vehicles come with regular and severe service maintenance intervals, most notably increased oil change intervals and transmission fluid intervals are what is commonly prescribed for severe over regular duty.
However, I've noticed that some car makers are doing away with severe or regular maintenance schedules and prescribing only one schedule. Chrysler instantly comes to mind. GM prescribes OLM based maintenance and I believe Toyota prescribes one schedule as well. I haven't checked on the other makers. On my charger for instance under severe duty I'm supposed to do tranny fluid changes every 60k miles and gear oil changes every 48k miles. Under normal duty it calls for NO tranny or gear oil changes. However starting in '08 Chrysler did away with two schedules and stuck in a simple 6k/6mo schedule.
I think this tells us that car makers aren't prescribing normal or severe duty based on equipment tolerance but more so on what they think the lubricants used with that equipment can tolerate. As lubricants of all kinds have gotten increasingly better with time, car makers are now comfortable relaxing/extending maintenance procedure and/or not differentiating between severe or normal duty.
I believe that what was once deemed severe duty (Multiple cold starts, sub 10 mile trips, extensive idle, etc.) was decided majorly because of the limitations of lubricants at that time not what the equipment could handle. Due to the increased level of lubricant performance I feel as though the severe duty of yesterday is today's normal duty.
What do you think?
Vehicles come with regular and severe service maintenance intervals, most notably increased oil change intervals and transmission fluid intervals are what is commonly prescribed for severe over regular duty.
However, I've noticed that some car makers are doing away with severe or regular maintenance schedules and prescribing only one schedule. Chrysler instantly comes to mind. GM prescribes OLM based maintenance and I believe Toyota prescribes one schedule as well. I haven't checked on the other makers. On my charger for instance under severe duty I'm supposed to do tranny fluid changes every 60k miles and gear oil changes every 48k miles. Under normal duty it calls for NO tranny or gear oil changes. However starting in '08 Chrysler did away with two schedules and stuck in a simple 6k/6mo schedule.
I think this tells us that car makers aren't prescribing normal or severe duty based on equipment tolerance but more so on what they think the lubricants used with that equipment can tolerate. As lubricants of all kinds have gotten increasingly better with time, car makers are now comfortable relaxing/extending maintenance procedure and/or not differentiating between severe or normal duty.
I believe that what was once deemed severe duty (Multiple cold starts, sub 10 mile trips, extensive idle, etc.) was decided majorly because of the limitations of lubricants at that time not what the equipment could handle. Due to the increased level of lubricant performance I feel as though the severe duty of yesterday is today's normal duty.
What do you think?