What makes an engine an Atkinson Cycle engine

Status
Not open for further replies.
28ebb6e9f7c09ad175d2d5aea4bbe46f.jpg
?
 
it's a more efficient cycle but you lose power density. If you were to have a pure Atkinson cycle engine in your car it would feel sluggish and no one would want to drive it. To bring the power up to an acceptable level you would have to increase the size of the engine and thus lose the efficiency gains. The sweet spot for these engines are low load points such as cruising at a steady speed. Toyota supplements the acceleration portion with their hybrid system and Mazda goes between the Atkinson and standard cycles as needed.

Go drive a skyactiv car and learn to feel the difference. If you drive very gently and stay in the Atkinson realm you'll get great fuel economy. However, if you just tip into the standard range fuel economy fallls off a cliff.
 
Originally Posted By: 09_GXP
it's a more efficient cycle but you lose power density. If you were to have a pure Atkinson cycle engine in your car it would feel sluggish and no one would want to drive it. To bring the power up to an acceptable level you would have to increase the size of the engine and thus lose the efficiency gains. The sweet spot for these engines are low load points such as cruising at a steady speed. Toyota supplements the acceleration portion with their hybrid system and Mazda goes between the Atkinson and standard cycles as needed.

Go drive a skyactiv car and learn to feel the difference. If you drive very gently and stay in the Atkinson realm you'll get great fuel economy. However, if you just tip into the standard range fuel economy fallls off a cliff.


Thank you. That was what i was looking for to a tee.
 
With the proper setup, I'd think an engine could move pretty well between these modes and be able to get good low-end torque when needed, good high-end HP when needed and excellent FE when cruising. I would think such an engine would need a small turbo charger (fast spin-up) to prevent/reduce perceived "turbo-lab" and very well controlled CVVT of both intake and exhaust timing/duration/lift.

The Koenigsegg's Wild Freevalve Engine comes to mind here.
 
Originally Posted By: RedOakRanch
The short version is the compression stroke is shorter than the power stroke.
How is this wondrous event performed?
grin2.gif
 
Originally Posted By: andyd
Originally Posted By: RedOakRanch
The short version is the compression stroke is shorter than the power stroke.
How is this wondrous event performed?
grin2.gif


In a modern Atkinson cycle engine? Variable valve timing.
 
Drove new Highlander few days ago with their Atkinson cycle engine. It is OK, but power is at very high end of rpms, which is really not best solution for an SUV.
Although it makes bit more torque then older engine at same rpms (4700), older engine felt bit more powerful at lower rpms.
 
Originally Posted By: 09_GXP
Go drive a skyactiv car and learn to feel the difference. If you drive very gently and stay in the Atkinson realm you'll get great fuel economy. However, if you just tip into the standard range fuel economy falls off a cliff.


I don't know. I drive mine HARD most of the time and my fuel economy still shows a combined number of 34. That's with an average speed of 37 due to all the traffic I am stuck in as well as all the traffic signals I sit through.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom