Correct. Context is important. I meant for general, defensive use by non-sworn civilians. The reason I ask is I see many people carrying very expensive weaponry with a lot of gadgets attached to them (not that there's anything wrong with that). There's nothing wrong with optics, flashlights or lasers, especially for home use, but those things add up when carrying concealed, and can make deployment complicated in a high-stress situation.Depends on purpose for that firearm. What is the context?
Personal? Sig P365 - concealed. Right hip.
On duty? Issued Glock 19 right hip
In the woods? Glock 20 right hip.
Statistically, and thankfully, the odds of actually being involved in a shooting incident are slim. . .even in law enforcement. It doesn't means we shouldn't be prepared, and the process of being prepared can be a really fun and rewarding hobby.Lets all just hope and pray we never need it. Its cool to talk, and to
at a
, in the real world
, its never something anyone should look for, encourage, etc. Its a tool and thats it.
I like Fobus OWB adjustable retention paddle holsters as generally my first choice.Correct. Context is important. I meant for general, defensive use by non-sworn civilians. The reason I ask is I see many people carrying very expensive weaponry with a lot of gadgets attached to them (not that there's anything wrong with that). There's nothing wrong with optics, flashlights or lasers, especially for home use, but those things add up when carrying concealed, and can make deployment complicated in a high-stress situation.
I tend to be in the "simpler is better" camp when it comes to concealed carry, and that's probably because that's what I'm used to carrying. Simplicity, reliability and safety guide my CC. For instance, I prefer OTW retention holsters. . . not as concealable as some others, but I feel better with mechanical retention, as a point of safety. There are a lot of considerations. . . .a disabled person, an older person, a female etc. will likely have different considerations.
What type of holsters to you use?
Agreed. Which is why I ended up with the Sig P365 - that very slim frame is easily concealable.I believe that for the average person carrying concealed. . . smaller frames ARE better. . . if my CC becomes a conversation-starter, I'm probably not concealed enough![]()
That's a nice concealment package. . . I can see why they're so popular. The optic looks like it belongs there! . . .very low profile.Agreed. Which is why I ended up with the Sig P365 - that very slim frame is easily concealable.
In winter, I can conceal a 1911, and have, but that’s a lot of “iron”. And, as much as I love a good 1911 (I have one in .38 Super, 9mm, several in .45 and a couple in 10mm) they don’t have a lot of capacity relative to their size.
The 365 has much larger capacity than previous pistols of its size. 12+1 plus a slim concealable frame is about the perfect combination.
I’m sure I’ve posted this before, but here is the pistol relative to my hand. Easy to shoot, easy to conceal.
View attachment 344379
View attachment 344380
I debated the red dot - it has pros/cons. I shoot very well with irons, been shooting with irons for a long, long time, and my current issued weapon is irons (if you can call tritium night sights “iron”).That's a nice concealment package. . . I can see why they're so popular. The optic looks like it belongs there! . . .very low profile.
My decision tree looks like this:A question for the group. . . what goes into your decision about which gun you carry? Do you tend to stick with one brand / caliber?
Like you, I learned a long time ago and I share that observation about one-eye shooting. I now use both eyes for iron sights, but it took years to be happy about it. The RDS's punctuate the advantages of combat shooting with both eyes, which are numerous. I think I'm faster on the draw with irons because I just don't use my wife's rds setup enough. . .it takes a few milliseconds more to get the dot where I need it. Will it matter in a close-up self defense scenario?. . . I'd bet not, as we probably won't remember even seeing our sights.I debated the red dot - it has pros/cons. I shoot very well with irons, been shooting with irons for a long, long time, and my current issued weapon is irons (if you can call tritium night sights “iron”).
But the red dot is compelling and oh so easy to shoot. Long, long ago (like the 1970s, when I learned to shoot) I started by closing one eye for aiming. I can’t seem to break that habit with a pistol and irons.
Now, with a red dot, it’s both eyes open, and both eyes open easily. Threat awareness, ease of aim, and accuracy are all great with that red dot. I’ve since equipped a couple of other pistols with a red dot.
One in particular, the Springfield Echelon, equipped with a Trijicon RMR, is my first choice as a full size pistol. So many advantages both to the gun itself, and the sighting system, that it would be my first choice for a duty/carry weapon if concealment wasn’t an issue.
Now, the Trijicon ain’t cheap. Nothing good ever is, but it’s a good sight and worth the money.View attachment 344449