I have a 4% rule* for individual stocks in the portfolio. A 5% rule makes sense for something like gold.
We have bought gold in the past. It was late summer 2011, I think, could’ve been 2010, when my wife called me from work and said, “we need to buy Gold”. As an intel officer in the Navy, she watches world events. We bought GLD, the ETF, for the equivalent of about $1100/ounce. We sold it a few months later for $1400/ounce. A nearly 30% gain in a few months.
Gold went up to $1800 as the year went on. Did I feel bad? Nope. We made 30% in a few months. A very nice return.
The gold market cratered the next year. Down to below $1000. Had I held on and been greedy, we would’ve lost money. I was glad to be out. Gold didn’t cross the $1400 threshold again for nearly a decade. It’s at about $1800 right now, so, if you had bought at the peak ten years ago, you would have a zero rate of return for a decade of investing. That’s a terrible return.
That‘s why GLD isn’t in my portfolio now.
However, the physical metal, in the form of coins, like double eagles, or krugerrand, may end up in our possession in the near future as we look for ways to transfer a bit of wealth to our children outside of estate taxes. We have a good estate attorney, and instruments in place appropriate for our position and desires, but some physical property like coins can be a simpler transfer than financial assets and property like real estate.
*The rule: no one stock should exceed 4% of the total portfolio value. This limits risk, should a stock crater, as well as limiting upside should you have a stock, like AMZN, that goes on a tear. At the moment, about 40% of our total portfolio is in individual stocks. The rest is in mutual funds, the preponderance of which are S&P 500 Index funds.