Ward's 10 Best Engines for 2007 at a glance

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:


" Time for the pushrod chevy crowd to say how OHC engines are inferior "

Well , OK , although the Hemis still hanging in there . Maybe more relevant , its getting close to time for the toyota Class Action Lawsuit Sludge Settlement crowd to collect their overdue money . See 1995 list for explanation .
blush.gif


Although there is the other way to beat that ;

6.6L OHV V-8 turbodiesel (Chevrolet Silverado HD)
365 hp/ 660 lb.-ft.
For: When the torque number starts with a 6....
thumbsup.gif

Against: Narrow relevance. ( just like 401 foot lbs is for the tundra ....only better ) .
smile.gif

Our take: The class of this class




One thing for sure , there are a lot numbers out there .....
and so much spin I get dizzy .

This is a correction of previous post .
 
My two favourite mass produced current engines made the list:
Mazda Motor Corp. 2.3L DISI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Mazdaspeed3)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd. 3.5L DOHC V-6 (Infiniti G35)

I am a little surprised to see
BMW AG 3L DOHC I-6 (Z4 3.0si)
everyone I know who has driven this back to back with the Porsche Cayman S cam back saying that the cayman puts it to shame. I think the z4 is still an attractively priced car compared to the Porsche.

And yes, props to the domestics. These two engines
DaimlerChrysler AG Hemi 5.7L OHV V-8 (Chrysler 300C)
Ford Motor Co. 4.6L SOHC V-8 (Mustang GT/Mustang Shelby GT)
are among my value favourites and appear on some very attractively priced cars. Like the Nissan 3.5
 
Here is how they pick 'em in China .
(Originally a BW PRESS RELEASE - interesting content besides engine list .)This is a 2007 contest - so I wonder if they pick retroactively instead of forward .
dunno.gif


- BorgWarner Supplies 7 of China's 10 Best Engines - Auto News from January 25, 2007 -


AUBURN HILLS, Mich., Jan. 25 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Seven of China's ten best engines are equipped with systems and components from the BorgWarner Engine Group, including:


* Civic 1.8L from Dongfeng Honda
* Mazda 6 Wagon 2.3L from China First Automobile Works (FAW)
* Teana 3.5L from Dongfeng Nissan
* BMW 530i from Brilliance BMW
* Sagitar 1.8T from FAW-VW
* Audi A6L 2.0T from FAW-VW
* Oriental Son 2.0L from Chery


- Timing chain systems, oil pumps, air pumps, water pumps and turbochargers are some of the technologies BorgWarner produces for these notable engines. -


- Sponsored by Auto Sports magazine, a publication of China Automotive News, China Heart is the first and only engine evaluation program in China. Thirty- six engines were assessed by a panel of judges which included researchers from Chinese institutes. All ten award-winning engines are produced in China. -

- As the world's third largest automotive market, China is currently experiencing unparalleled growth. Passenger vehicle sales in China are expected to increase 30% in 2006 according to estimates by Citigroup Research. As a result, global and domestic automakers plan to double passenger-vehicle manufacturing capacity to 10 million units by 2010. Endeavoring to build their domestic base, Chinese automakers are also launching new competitive brands, especially in the luxury vehicle segment. -

As China's automotive industry grows, the government is pressuring auto makers to find solutions to the oil crisis while addressing environmental concerns. BorgWarner's technology is specifically aimed at improving fuel economy and reducing emissions to meet this increasing demand. -

.....................Auburn Hills, Michigan-based BorgWarner Inc. is a product leader in highly engineered components and systems for vehicle powertrain applications worldwide. The FORTUNE 500 company operates manufacturing and technical facilities in 63 locations in 18 countries. Customers include Ford, VW/Audi, DaimlerChrysler, General Motors, Toyota, Renault/Nissan, Hyundai/Kia, Honda, BMW, Caterpillar, Navistar International, and Peugeot. ........................
 
Quote:


I am a little surprised to see
BMW AG 3L DOHC I-6 (Z4 3.0si)
everyone I know who has driven this back to back with the Porsche Cayman S cam back saying that the cayman puts it to shame. I think the z4 is still an attractively priced car compared to the Porsche.




Umm...the list is entitled "Ward’s 10 Best Engines 2007", not "10 Best Cars 2007."

Ward's 10 Best Engines 2007

If it was a car comparison, the proper match to the Cayman S would be the Z4 M Coupe, not the 3.0si. The engine in the M Coupe has also appeared on Ward's list multiple times.
 
On the money and highly prophectic
Of course time marches on .....maybe ahem , a little rewrite is in order .............


Guts & glory: ten best engine awards
Visnic, Bill
Ward's AutoWorld, Jan 1, 1996 12:00 PM
............................................................
...........................It isn't until one starts comparing engines that similarities emerge. Similarity -- following what the other guy does -- is both the foundation and the folly of the automobile business.
There's an internal combustion engine in every wheeled passenger vehicle sold by the world's volume automakers. Some automakers produce expensive vehicles, so one expects the parts that make them run to be equally extravagant. For automakers who produce everyday vehicles, the trick to the trade is offering something more than the customer expects, something beyond what the purely crass business equation says must be provided.

Better, then, to follow someone else's lead. Let them establish the ground rules and take the initial chances, then you play the game. Do it like that and you'll probably survive, but you're not likely to do anything special.
It's that way with engines. The most expensive collection of components in every vehicle, the engine likewise is the part with which the customer most "interacts." Get it right and the ever-demanding customer is satisfied; make it special and he's hooked for life.
That is what Ward's Best Engines awards are all about. Singling out automakers who craft engines (remember, the part the buyer most interacts with) that are special. Engines that deliver more than they perhaps really must. Engines that are symbolic of the automaker's devotion to fine engineering and quality manufacture.
For 1996, six Ward's editors nominated 29 different engines for the 1996 Best Engines Award. After judging them all against one another, the following are our Ten Best Engines of 1996................................................................................................................................................................................


Now consider all that and these two automakers , their circumstances at the time and what we know today .
This also partialy explains why " toyotatittes " must be contained and removed .

Nissan 3L V-6
"An important benchmark," quotes the logbook for Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.'s silken "VQ" 3L DOHC V-6. "The fact that this engine achieves what it does without variable valve timing, turbos or other `tricks' is crucial -- and makes the VQ very special."
The VQ's straightforward design -- reflecting a philosophy at Nissan to simplify componentry -- sees a 10% parts reduction over the iron-block 3L V-6 the VQ range replaces, with weight savings of more than 100 lbs. (45 kg). Similar weight reductions in the reciprocating masses and valvetrain also impart the 3L VQ with its whispering NVH levels. The same reductions are the primary contributors to this engine's almost eerie rev-happiness. Want to scream along in third gear at 80 mph (128 km/h) and 6,000 rpm? No problem -- the driver's hard-pressed to notice the difference between that 6,000 rpm and cruising in fifth gear at 2,000 rpm.
Nissan's intensely automated Iwaki assembly plant takes molten aluminum at one end and pops three versions of the VQ out the other. In between, the blocks are deburred by robots, the crankshafts are microfinished by robots and groups of two dozen engines ride a gleaming merry-go-round bench tester, simultaneously tested by robots. A full 70% of the entire VQ engine-making process is automated.
Such is the intense thought Nissan places in the VQ build process. Similar effort went into the VQ range's design and engineering -- and that's what makes the 3L VQ the best normally aspirated V-6 on the planet........................
......................................................................................................................................................................................
Toyota 3L V-6
A freshman to the Ward's Best Engines list, Toyota Motor Co. Ltd.'s 3L DOHC V-6 is a mainstay of the Toyota line. Standard equipment in the Avalon and Lexus ES300, the 1MZ-FE is optional in the Camry.
Some testers reckon Toyota's DOHC V-6 is the "gold standard" (good thing no one named )
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
of the affordable sedan market. It's not too flashy in its specification or technology; no, the 3L V-6 is simply a finely honed example of current mainstream multivalve-engine development. Like so much of what Toyota does, there's a quiet, competent subtlety to this engine, a powerplant that delivers everything required yet often remains in the background.
Not flashy, maybe, but Toyota didn't hold back on the 3L V-6's basic engineering. There's a fancy direct-ignition system, a hot-wire mass airflow meter, reduced-friction reciprocating components and a structure-stiffening aluminum oil pan to augment the rigid aluminum cylinder block.
Toyota engineers pay special attention
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
to the combustion chamber and pistons, reducing the "squish" area between the top of the piston and the upper piston ring, a region where unburned hydrocarbons (HC) are known to roam. Combined with good-swirling intake air routed through upright intake runners, the design conspires to produce a very low emissions profile.
Admirable as that is, it was the 1MZ-FE's snappy throttle response and snarly midrange acceleration that won our testers' votes. This engine is so downright competent in just about every subjective measure that finding fault with it is an exercise in frustration. Factor in Toyota's earned reputation for Gibraltar-like reliability
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
crackmeup.gif
and this volume-produced V-6 can stand with any 6-cyl. engine in the world ...............................................................................................................................................................................

© 2007 PRIMEDIA Inc. All rights reserved
 
Wikipedia gets it 1/2 right 1/2 wrong and has large errors of omission and commission .
I don't have the exact info in front of me ,but it gets down to which platform/model name in which market in what model year and on what date of manufacture .

I may not be remembering this correctly , but as far as USA and camry , for sure we had camry v6s equiped with the the 3VZ-FE (NOT 1MZ-FE sludge motor ) for model year 1992/1993 .

Less assuredly , I think the last two years of this generation in USA were equiped with the 1MZ-FE .

1994 (USA/camry ) I can't remember which one .


Easy enough to determine elsewhere if needed .


You will also notice there are large gaps in the Camry text section .
 
Looks like it was first used in the Camry in 1994.

Still, the point is, a hot-wire mass-air-flow sensor on a 1994 model year car isn't exactly cutting-edge.
 
Fair enough ,although that as you know , is not the most important aspect/shortcoming of this engine or toyota engine/engineering in general .
Lets be fair here , and look over the list for all years .
How many have developed a colorful personality since making the list ?.( Don't get me wrong , I like these guys and their approach to this list - they're good car guys - engine first .)
There is an articule out there that partially answers that , can't remember if its Wards or Crains tittled something like " Eight that missed " - its hard to find but worth a read .
You know what else is fun to do ?
Add up over the years how each manufacturer has done , both in terms of nominees and winners and other stuff like that , then think about what that might mean .
 
From the 2006 List ( Last year )

Unplugging the Hybrid Hype

Harsh reality is settling in. After winning 10 Best Engines awards in 2004(toyota) and 2005(Honda), no hybrid electric vehicle (HEV) powertrain made our list this year. Chalk it up to rising expectations and a declining gee-whiz factor.
In other words, our honeymoon with hybrids is over.

Environmentalists say HEVs are the magic bullet that will save the auto industry as well as the atmosphere. Auto makers are charging hefty premiums for the technology. In that light, the HEVs we tested this year are as good as ever, but not living up to their own hype .

We have been duly impressed in the past, naming Toyota Motor Corp. HEVs to the 10 Best Engines list twice and Honda Motor Co. Ltd.'s system once.

In 2001, we were thrilled with the way Toyota brought HEV technology to the practical Prius sedan in a relatively transparent fashion. In 2004, we were awed by how much Toyota improved the system.

Last year, judges were wowed by the way Honda's sophisticated Integrated Motor Assist (IMA) hybrid system dispelled the myth that HEVs have to be slow and boring.


This year, we could not ignore a few shortcomings.
First among our complaints, pointed out by a growing number of journalists and disgruntled owners, is is real-world fuel economy far less than what is advertised.
Second, fuel economy is affected too much by driving style and ambient temperature.

The Lexus RX 400h is the epitome of luxury and environmental friendliness when we moved silently through stop-and-go traffic on full electric power. But once the vehicle's internal combustion engine gets involved with propulsion, we were less impressed. During hard acceleration it doesn't have the premium sound we expect from a vehicle with a base price approaching $50,000. Plus, we were underwhelmed with our 25 mpg (9L/100 km) average. EPA STICKER 2006: 33 CITY / 28 HIGHWAY / 30 COMBINED . AVERAGE USER 24.1

NASA astronaut Ken Mattingly spent tedious hours in a flight simulator figuring out a start-up sequence that used only 20 amps for an energy-starved Apollo 13. That made for compelling drama in a movie.
Employing the same power-saving tactics just to squeeze out something close to the EPA mileage from a Civic Hybrid on a cold day is a bit less engaging.
Want something close to its alleged 49/51 mpg (5L/100 km/4.6L/100 km) on a frosty morning? Forget about warming up the engine or using the defroster. Scrape the windows by hand, stay off the throttle and the expressway and get ready to shiver.
Enduring that kind of inconvenience is fine if you need to get back from space with your fuel cells spent, but not when you're just heading to work.
— Drew Winter

http://wardsautoworld.com/ar/auto_best_engines_10/index.html
 
Quote:


i've noticed alot of people trash talk Ford, i think are under the impression since they are losing millions of dollars and are falling quickly that they build inferior engines, this is not true, them losing money has to due with bad management, and business decsions,not lack of quality, the 4.6 is in there cause it's a stateof the art engine, If you look back the other years Ford is always in the top 10 Why?? well because they know how to build one heck of an engine!








Ford Motor Co. 4.6L SOHC V-8
By Bill Visnic
WardsAuto.com, Dec 20, 2006 9:04 AM

A funny thing happened while Ward’s 10 Best Engines judges were pondering the expanding list of Mustang variants in search of the best way to sample the auto maker’s modular 4.6L SOHC V-8: Ford’s on-the-ball press-fleet coordinators hustled over one of the first examples of the Shelby GT.
Most of us didn’t get out of the parking garage before scrambling for a pen to wax eloquent about this seemingly innocuous tweak to the 4.6L V-8, the brawny and vocal new generation of Ford’s excellent modular V-8 family that scorched its way to a 10 Best Engines win when launched two years ago.

That’s because the even growlier exhaust note is immediately evident when bouncing off concrete walls. Not that it really needs any augmentation. The 4.6L V-8’s exhaust symphony simply is the best on the market, but the new Shelby GT specification of the 4.6L somehow improves on what we were convinced already was V-8 aural perfection.
This comes by way of Ford’s Racing components unit, which supplies for the Shelby GT a Ford Racing Power Pack that fits a cold-air intake (an import tuner-market staple), a revised crossover pipe for the dual exhaust and some engine-management software fettling.
The result is an extremely noticeable 25-hp improvement over the standard 4.6L V-8’s stout 300 hp and a slight gain in torque, from 320 lb.-ft. (434 Nm) to 330 lb.-ft. (447 Nm). The shorter final-drive ratio, 3.55:1 compared with the Mustang GT’s 3.31:1, also is a likely conspirator in notably nastier in-gear acceleration.
The Shelby GT, by the way, is the civilian version of the Shelby GT-H, which only can be sampled by renting one from Hertz.

Ford 4.6L SOHC V-8 particularly evocative in new 325-hp trim.
The Ford Racing Power Pack “really wakes this engine up,” says one Ward’s editor, reminding that one of our only reservations regarding Ford’s modular V-8s is some low-rpm sleepiness that isn’t erased until the engine gets “on the cam.”
But as usual with this V-8, the sounds leave as much impression as the power.
The cold-air intake, for example, isn’t shy about making it’s presence known. With the Power Pack, the revised 4.6L V-8’s intake bark can single-handedly raise the national terror-threat color. Coordinating with the even more luscious exhaust, the 325-hp 4.6L V-8 is about as subtle as a truck-stop breakfast.
If you don’t yearn for all that sturm and drang, go for the 4.6L V-8 in standard 300-hp trim, which is one of the market’s unqualified excitement-per-dollar leaders and is more convincing than most engines while just idling in the driveway.
And as one reader reminded just minutes after posting this year’s 10 Best Engines winners on WardsAuto.com, you don’t need the admittedly limited-purpose Mustang GT to partake of the 4.6L V-8’s special character: Ford also offers this engine (in iron-block form) for the Explorer and Explorer Sport Trac.
But really, the Mustang Shelby GT – 325 hp, 330 lb.-ft. and 0-60 mph (97 km/h) in about 5 seconds, all for about $35,000. We see more 10 Best Engines awards in the future with numbers like those.

[email protected]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top