W.C.W. opens used NAPA Altrom ATM 2ON0S002 ...

[Sayjac]

The Full oil filter looks to be well made. Otoh, for those putting efficiency at the top of the list for filter selection, my speculation is the Full much the same as the Asian OEM filters, ie. not very efficient.

As for the comment(s) regarding posting direct link to YT vids, since being chastised by a mod and having an automotive/oil related YT vid and thread removed, I refrain from posting any thread starters with YT vids or reference to such. I find that works best 'for me' as it avoids any/all possible conflict. That said, I don't know if that OP's reasoning here or not. I suppose good to know for sure that all WCW vids linking apparently acceptable.

 

[Astro14]

The Full oil filter looks looks to be a well made. Otoh, for those putting efficiency at the top of the list for filter selection, my speculation the Full much the same as the Asian OEM filters, ie. not very efficient.

As for the comment(s) regarding posting direct link to YT vids, since being chastised by a mod and having an automotive/oil related YT vid and thread removed, I refrain from direct linking all YT vids. That said, I don't know if that OP's reasoning or not. I suppose good to know for sure that all WCW vids linking apparently acceptable.

It’s not that hard to understand.

We posted it all here so that you could reference: https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/t...lem-notifications-copyright-trademark.319568/

We don’t make a decision on YouTube videos solely on the content creator. We make a decision in accordance with the referenced policies.

Most videos are fine. However…

If you post a video that contains profanity, for example, that’s against the policy we have concerning profanity.

If you post a video that shows you how to do something illegal, that’s against our policy for posting videos that encourage illegal activity.

If you post a video that’s designed to incite controversy, that’s trolling.

There are thousands of videos linked on BITOG, so obviously, some folks have figured it out.

The problem with this thread is that the original poster gave a minimal, and vague, description, which is unlikely to yield consistent results for the members here. The thread isn’t helpful. Or useful, or even interesting.

Describing a video poorly, and then telling us to go search for it, is an appalling lack of common courtesy.

 

[martinq]

For $7 I guess it's an ok filter.. good amount of media and of course thicker can than a M&H product but media quality looks jobber to me.

Thanks for the link. I cut open three of these and was not impressed overall, decided not to use them. There were glue issues and I wasn't sold on the media either. Also, you may notice that the "M-Pleat" is not really a thing, two short pleats per five long in this filter. 109 in.sq. is not bad but is it "30% more"? I'm sure they can do better but this is more of an economy filter.