I just looked the SDS for Valvoline Restore and Protect (because due diligence) and my curiosity stands:
If it works so well, and people have said so, then why aren't companies like Sopus and others trying to market their own version of a hyper-cleaning oil? It seems, from the SDS// (PHOSPHORODITHIOIC ACID, MIXED O,O-BIS(1,3DIMETHYLBUTYL AND ISO-PR) ESTERS, ZINC SALTS 84605-29-8 DIPHENYLAMINE 122-39-4// data Valvoline isn't claiming that these chemicals are proprietary. I'm pretty sure that the formulation itself is covered under patent(s) but who's to say that I tweak here or there couldn't be a different patent in itself. Generally, I'm saying that companies are usually granted a proprietary listing when they are marketing a new product that isn't otherwise on the market.
I'm also sure that Valvoline thought long and hard about this (pretty easily assumed)
If it works so well, and people have said so, then why aren't companies like Sopus and others trying to market their own version of a hyper-cleaning oil? It seems, from the SDS// (PHOSPHORODITHIOIC ACID, MIXED O,O-BIS(1,3DIMETHYLBUTYL AND ISO-PR) ESTERS, ZINC SALTS 84605-29-8 DIPHENYLAMINE 122-39-4// data Valvoline isn't claiming that these chemicals are proprietary. I'm pretty sure that the formulation itself is covered under patent(s) but who's to say that I tweak here or there couldn't be a different patent in itself. Generally, I'm saying that companies are usually granted a proprietary listing when they are marketing a new product that isn't otherwise on the market.
I'm also sure that Valvoline thought long and hard about this (pretty easily assumed)
Last edited by a moderator: