I'm helping a friend of mine shop for a used car, which I admittedly have little experience doing from a dealer (which she insists upon). She now has her eye on a 2000 Accord V-6 we saw that has 88k on it. I'm getting conflicting reports as to whether the timing belt is due at 90k or 105k.
My basic question is, is it unreasonable of me to insist that the dealer change the timing belt and water pump with purchase (It's a Toyota dealership)? Any additional general tips for the situation?
They're asking $7000 for it not including the 6 month warranty my friend insists on (~$700 IIRC). Do you think a counteroffer of including the warranty and timing belt for the same cost is reasonable, unreasonable or even still selling ourselves short?
My basic question is, is it unreasonable of me to insist that the dealer change the timing belt and water pump with purchase (It's a Toyota dealership)? Any additional general tips for the situation?
They're asking $7000 for it not including the 6 month warranty my friend insists on (~$700 IIRC). Do you think a counteroffer of including the warranty and timing belt for the same cost is reasonable, unreasonable or even still selling ourselves short?
Last edited: