US Postal Service suspending pension contributions

Some Federal employees are unionized, but not all. The USPS is in a tough spot: rising costs, declining revenues, minimal government funding and pressure from large retailers and mailers to keep shipping costs low. Sure, many postal employees are overpaid, but there's more to it than that. How many postage stamps have you purchased in the past year?
We buy a book of stamps every 6-9 months. You?
 
How many of those businesses are mandated to provide uniform service throughout the nation, including the boondocks and hinterlands where the Postal Service must deliver mail by snowmobile, motorboat, dog sled or seaplane? This is the biggest argument against privatization of the Postal Service. No one else will perform the service.
The US postal service does not deliver on the end of a motorboat or seaplane - pure gibberish. US postal service only delivers on year round regularly maintained public roads. For those that live outside normal routes they can receive mail "general delivery" - meaning you go to the nearest post office and pick it up.

You also pay more to ship packages to places like Alaska and Hawaii.

More reason to sunset the post office. Do taxpayers need to subsidize Amazon delivery for rural areas?
 
The US postal service does not deliver on the end of a motorboat or seaplane - pure gibberish. US postal service only delivers on year round regularly maintained public roads. For those that live outside normal routes they can receive mail "general delivery" - meaning you go to the nearest post office and pick it up.

You also pay more to ship packages to places like Alaska and Hawaii.

More reason to sunset the post office. Do taxpayers need to subsidize Amazon delivery for rural areas?
Never say never. Couldn't find any snowmobile or cable car pics, lol. https://news.usps.com/2017/06/13/special-deliveries/

https://facts.usps.com/unusual-delivery-method-dock-to-dock/ ......... https://facts.usps.com/boat-delivery-on-the-detroit-river/
1776001096865.webp
1776000872400.webp


https://facts.usps.com/8-mile-mule-train-delivery/
1776000208445.webp
 
Last edited:
Yep, look at UPS and the tens of thousands of layoffs and one time payments to get rid of drivers that make 50 bucks and hour to move cardboard boxes.

Yes.

UPS doing everything to get rid of older employees at the top of the pay scale.

The company I work for also offering ‘early retirement’ package.
 
Criticism is fun, but doesn't solve anything. Let's hear some good solutions.
Stop delivering packages. Was never post office's intent. Intent was to allow communication not ship goods.

Change delivery to 3 days a week max. Maybe 2?

End forever stamps and double the rates.

We shall then see what is important and what is not important, and can move forward from there. I don't think the post office is even needed but there will need to be a transition. This could be step 1.
 
Yes they do, but it’s also electric bills, advertising, newspapers, all sorts of things. Your argument is reductio ad absurdum. Who or what draws the line? Wyoming doesn’t get mail because it’s more expensive than Connecticut?
I said packages. Post office should not deliver packages at all IMHO - was never the intent of a post office. If they want to do so at a profit then they should privatize. So yes, people should pay there own way.

I am willing to allow the post office to exist for communications - however I don't believe anyone is truly using it for that anymore. So double the rate for a bill or letter and find out. $2 for an important communication is not oppressive.
 
Packages are a huge portion of their revenue, and it's a growing segment. It's almost equal to First Class Mail which is declining.

IMO, many of First Class Mail's duties can be handled electronically.

1776004377513.webp
 
Last edited:
Stop delivering packages. Was never post office's intent. Intent was to allow communication not ship goods.

Change delivery to 3 days a week max. Maybe 2?

End forever stamps and double the rates.

We shall then see what is important and what is not important, and can move forward from there. I don't think the post office is even needed but there will need to be a transition. This could be step 1.
This ia brutal approach but would most likely work.

If anything they can get rid of Saturday delivery.

I am fond of the USPS for many reasons, especially since my letter carrier, growing up, looked like Mr. Mcfeely from Mr. Roger's Neighborhood. He looked very similar, older guy who wore the hat, and the cart. I thought I lived in Mr.Roger's hood lol.
 
This ia brutal approach but would most likely work.

If anything they can get rid of Saturday delivery.

I am fond of the USPS for many reasons, especially since my letter carrier, growing up, looked like Mr. Mcfeely from Mr. Roger's Neighborhood. He looked very similar, older guy who wore the hat, and the cart. I thought I lived in Mr.Roger's hood lol.
I have no quarrel with postal employees. However I believe the post office is yet one more un-necessary thing that were both funding and arguing over while our government is functionally bankrupt anyway.

The really funny part is this thread is about govco ending funding to the postal pension. We the people will be no doubt liable for this pension anyway - similar rulings have already been made in courts regarding state pensions. Therefore not funding pension is akin to a private company not paying there FICA taxes - which would land the managers in jail.

More different rules for different folks.
 
I have no quarrel with postal employees. However I believe the post office is yet one more un-necessary thing that were both funding and arguing over while our government is functionally bankrupt anyway.

The really funny part is this thread is about govco ending funding to the postal pension. We the people will be no doubt liable for this pension anyway - similar rulings have already been made in courts regarding state pensions. Therefore not funding pension is akin to a private company not paying there FICA taxes - which would land the managers in jail.

More different rules for different folks.
Yes, I think Illinoise has this issue. IIRC it's in the constitution somehow to pay pensions, no matter what. I mean it makes sense kind of, you signed up for its etc. but the gov't should act responsibly, which is likely impossible when you have little accountability when a block of voters will vote you in no matter how bad it gets.

Personally, the USPS is the last thing I'd liek to see go.

State funding programs and free money to NGOs should be severely scrutinized and cut back. I.E. the Minnesota scams (also prevalent likely everywhere else), homelessness in CA, billions in more homeless out etc.
 
I have no quarrel with postal employees. However I believe the post office is yet one more un-necessary thing that were both funding and arguing over while our government is functionally bankrupt anyway.

The really funny part is this thread is about govco ending funding to the postal pension. We the people will be no doubt liable for this pension anyway - similar rulings have already been made in courts regarding state pensions. Therefore not funding pension is akin to a private company not paying there FICA taxes - which would land the managers in jail.

More different rules for different folks.
Again this is more misinformation. The Federal government does not fund or contribute to USPS pensions. The Postal Service funds them, and they are distributed by the Office of Personnel Management. If the Postal Service were to go bankrupt or become insolvent, THEN the Federal government would be responsible. So far as I know, the only Federal funds that the USPS has received are for its new EV program, which certainly could become a cluster ....
 
Again this is more misinformation. The Federal government does not fund or contribute to USPS pensions. The Postal Service funds them, and they are distributed by the Office of Personnel Management. If the Postal Service were to go bankrupt or become insolvent, THEN the Federal government would be responsible. So far as I know, the only Federal funds that the USPS has received are for its new EV program, which certainly could become a cluster ....
Its not misinformation because the government runs the post office. Post office is not paying pension which means government is not paying pension. Same.

The thread started because the USPS can't currently fund their pension. However its not really a pension on the funding side because they will never be allowed to shed the pension like a company that goes bankrupt, hence we the people will pay either way. So its the same as a private company not paying there FICA, which is never allowed.

Whether the post office makes money or doesn't is irrelevant. Government is not a business. We no longer need a post office for the security or business of the nation as we did in 1776 when we in fact did. Therefore there is no good reason whatsoever to keep it functioning - profitable or not. Sunset it and focus on important things.
 
For those who are quick to favor abolishing the US Postal Service, a simple summary by AI is appropriate:

The USPS is a public, independent entity of the executive branch, not a private corporation. Established in 1970, it functions as a government-business hybrid that is self-funded through postage sales rather than taxpayer money, yet it is mandated to provide universal service to all American addresses.
 
Once again, many individuals lack accurate information regarding the functioning of federal unions (not just pertaining to the postal service). Are you a federal employee? Are you aware of the specific limitations imposed on these unions compared to private sector unions (can’t strike, some cannot bargain for wages etc.)? Alternatively, do you merely rely on hearsay and personal anecdotes to form your understanding? This does not have to be political, nor do I want it to be.
The NLRB is a government union that protects other unions. That is a conflict in my book. The outcome of every unfair labor practice charge is determined on day one...guilty.
 
For those who are quick to favor abolishing the US Postal Service, a simple summary by AI is appropriate:

The USPS is a public, independent entity of the executive branch, not a private corporation. Established in 1970, it functions as a government-business hybrid that is self-funded through postage sales rather than taxpayer money, yet it is mandated to provide universal service to all American addresses.
By universal service it must mean that if we don't deliver to your address you must rent a PO Box and pay for all the junk mail. Our local post office is open 9:30 -4:30 and half day Wednesday and Saturday if they have employees to cover those half days. It's almost impossible for a family where both work to get a package because of those hours. The USPS has really gone down hill over the years.
 
Back
Top Bottom