Originally Posted By: d00df00d
Originally Posted By: Al
They should get paid in accordance what we can afford . Communities are struggling to pay the enormous legacy benefits and medical benefits.
You cold eliminate the Gangsta'NEA/AFT and get any number of better qualified teachers than the hacks (in many cases) in place now.
Let the school district advertise for terachers based on what the system can afford..not what the Unions demand (or strike) You would have long lines of qualified teachers applying.
If the system can't "afford" to pay teachers more than it does now, that's a problem.
I happen to think that, while teacher pay is low for what most teachers bring to the table and what the job entails, it is also more or less in line with what teachers actually deliver. That discrepancy is down to how they are trained and the inordinate pressures placed on them by administration, both of which are heavily influenced by lack of money (among many other things). Again, while we obviously don't want to throw money at a broken system, taking money out of it isn't the solution either.
Starting teachers with only a B.Sc. in the district where my wife treats start around $42k/yr.
But remember, the year is like 1380 hours. That's about $30/hr or equivalent to $60k/yr on a standard 2000 hr man-year.
Not bad, not great.
And while openings for lower-education jobs get flooded literally with thousands of applications, those in math and science offer bonuses because the bulk of the existing population, let alone graduating kids, are too stupid to be able to understand geometry or calculus in a practical manner.