Trans-sonic and wind drift

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 12, 2002
Messages
43,965
Location
'Stralia
To get it out of the other thread...

Originally Posted By: Shannow
There's a thing with wind drift in that it is proportional to the difference in vacuum time of flight versus actual (delay time), rather than actual time of flight.

It means that around the transonic range, there is a step change in how much longer a bullet takes to reach it's destination than the time that it takes to get there.

A .22 standard versus a super, the super takes a hit in wind drift...the magnum doesn't get it back, and IIRC, a hornet is still hanging out there.

For mental picture, consider two trains on parallel tracks. Distance between them in a vacuum takes the bullet "T" seconds", in air, it takes "T+t", t beign the delay.

Scenario 1 Target is stationary, rifle is on moving train, and trigger is pulled at target dead centre. The bullet is travelling in two planes, and losing velocity equally in both planes...it hits a distance away from the target. Whether it is a vacuum, or in air, the trajectory is the same, so the displacement is proportional to T.

Scenario 2 Target is moving, rifle is stationary, and trigger is pulled at target dead centre. It is still travelling a straight line, but takes T+t to get there...target has moved on for T+t seconds, so the movement of point of impact is T+t.

Scenario 3, target and rifle are on opposite tracks, moving with each other. Therefore the bullet already has the velocity of it's own train in that direction, and the sight/target are motionless compared to each other. Pull the trigger, and the bullet is slowing in two planes, and the displacement on target is proportional to the "t" component...not the time of flight.

Scenario 4...real life, the target and the rifle aren't on trains, and there's a wind blowing across between them. The reverse of 3 is observed, and the miss is proportional to "t", the delay time, as opposed to "T" the vacuum time, or "T+t" the actual time.

bullets that cross the sonic zone with variable loading are the worst at demonstrating this...and IMO, the .22 Mag is worse still.



Originally Posted By: Shannow
Wind drift is always related to the delay time (delta time of flight vacuum versus air), regrdless of velocity and time of flight.

Two bullets, same weight, same speed, different ballistic co-efficient, the one with the better ballistic co-efficient has less drift...not proportional to the time of flight, but due to the better performance of the good BC in air versus the other one.

http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA570469

Quote:
Abstract: This paper describes the internal, external, and terminal ballisticsof the 30-06 rifle cartridge.With cartridge case capacity of 68-70 grains of water and operating pressures up to 60,000 psi, the 30-06 launches 110-220 grain bullets with muzzle velocities between 3400 fps and 2400 fps, respectively. Low-drag bullets are available which make the 30-06 an effective and capable choice for target and anti-personnel use out to 1000 yards, but longer range applications are challenging due to the sonic transition. With an appropriate bullet choice, the 30-06 penetrates a variety of commonly encountered barriers. It also penetrates soft body armors and can deliver significant wounding effects even when stopped by hard body armor. At shorter ranges, wounding effects in human and deer-sized living targets are impressive and yield rapid incapacitation.


Quote:
Most ballistic calculators compute horizontal winddriftusing a procedure equivalent to the formula Wd = 17.6 x Vw x Tlag where Wd is the horizontal wind deflection (in inches), Vw is the cross wind velocity (in miles per hour), and Tlag is the lag time, or time delay between the time the bullet would reach that range in a vacuum and the time it actually takes when aerodynamic drag is included (in seconds).


It's counter-intuitive, but fact...you have to get the velocity and BC high enough to get the Tlag down to the same as a subsonic round to come back to the same drift.


It's just that in the world of trans-sonic bullets, the "delay" time is more for the supersoninc bullets out to a reasonable speed beyond sonic.
 
Problem is comparing apples to apples in the trans-sonic region.

Spend some time with
http://www.hornady.com/ballistics-resource/ballistics-calculator

And alter only one variable at a time...the subject was .22s, and the .223 vesus .22-250 was brought in...it's valid, but bear with me...the difficulties, and the counterintuitive effects are all at the transsonic region, when a subsonic bullet takes longer to get there but is "Delayed" less by it's lower drag co-efficient than it's supersonic counterparts.

Pick a B.C. of 0.13 (not good, but rimfire typical), and 10MPH cross wind
Code:


Velocity 100Y 200Y

1000 4" 15"

1200 5.4 19

1400 6.0 21.8

1600 5.7 22.4

1800 5.1 21.6

2000 4.5 19.9

.

.

3200 2.3 10.4

3600 2.0 8.8


Threw in the last two as a .223/.22-250 analogy, NOT that you'd ever use a round nose, poor B.C. projectile at those velocities. Check out how many FPS a supersonic .22LR loses in the first 100-150 yards versu their subsonic partners...that's indicative of the delay time.

Notice the trend, notice that the section of the range where the bullet spends most of it's time trans-sonic is the worst affected (1,600fps, the 100Y starts coming back in, while the 200Y is worse)...

Apples and Orange Comparison then to compare the behaviours of a .223/.22-250 at mach 3, but plug them in and see also.
Hornady A-Max, B.C. 0.435
Code:


Velocity 100Y 200Y

3600 0.6 2.3

3200 0.7 2.6

.

.

.

2000 1.3 5.1

1600 1.7 6.6

1400 1.8 7.2

1200 1.8 6.7

1000 1.3 4.9


Same thing happens...but the higher B.C. will ALWAYS have less wind drift than the poorer.
And in the caseof the A-Max, it doesn't get the drift advantage back until 2,000FPS...mach 3...of course it conforms to sensibilities.
 
No disrespect intended, you are obviously very intelligent. But none of this means squat to someone who just plain enjoys shooting a 22 Mag, .22LR, or any other caliber. Maybe to a professional sniper......
 
Hi,

Folks that like to plink may find wide groups due to wind frustrating.

Knowing a little about the limits and useful range before wind causes wide groups
is worthwhile.

Especially during hunting season!
 
Originally Posted By: PR1955
No disrespect intended, you are obviously very intelligent. But none of this means squat to someone who just plain enjoys shooting a 22 Mag, .22LR, or any other caliber. Maybe to a professional sniper......


I came across it when I was shooting in my rimfire field class competitions, ranges 30, 60, 90m, and 50, 100m.

My personal experience was that it was easier to establish a consistent hold for the poorer trajectory than it was to allow for greater wind drift...I had a few converts in the club who dropped back from the 1400fps LRs to the subs, and improve their scores markedly (whether it was confidence, or a smaller variability, who knows).

In the centrefire (.223 out to 600 yards), was using 60gr V-Maxes, and dropped to the A-Max (same BC, lower weight, more velocity) to REDUCE the hold by getting more velocity.

Not raining on anyone's parade, telling anyone what to do, just presenting a little known issue that occurs around the speed of sound.
 
I agree with Shannow, but it means little to someone inside of 50 yds/m's where many family Saturday shoots happen... I'd never try to stretch a 22LR out to 100 yds/m's for anything meaningful, not even squirrel ...

You want that critter and not a piece of the tree, step up to something pointier (BC) and with considerable more oomph behind it
laugh.gif


I don't mind reaching out with a 22-250 (don't have any 223's) or a 6.5mm. But they all have much better BC's
smile.gif
 
Originally Posted By: BrocLuno
I'd never try to stretch a 22LR out to 100 yds/m's for anything meaningful, not even squirrel ...


Many other will, and in fact do every day. Both the .22 L.R. and the .22 Magnum are more than capable, and are accurate enough to take small game cleanly out to 100 yards. The .22 Magnum will be less susceptible to wind drift within those ranges, because it has higher velocity with equal weight bullets.
 
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Same thing happens...but the higher B.C. will ALWAYS have less wind drift than the poorer.
Except in the example I gave of .223 versus .22-250, all of of the components were the same brand and type--bullets, cases, primers, & powder. To the extent possible, all variances were eliminated (except the obvious small primer versus large and increased powder charge). The bullets were the same B.C., but the .22-250 ALWAYS experienced less wind drift, and I attribute that to the velocity difference and nothing else.
 
Out in the desert, yeah 100 yds is a clean shot, so if you can dope the wind, maybe... 22 WRM sure. 22 LR, not on my watch. In my neck of the woods, it's hard to get a 100 yds clean. Too much brush and foliage.

And I used to collect 22's and have a wide assortment including match rifles. Just ain't goinna do it. I have tried, more often than not it's a gut shot, or a piece of the branch and a wounded animal. I don't care about squirrel suffering as they are pests and I will get them any way I can. But I just don't make a habit of wounding. Happens, but I try really hard not to.

That's why I've pretty much switched to PCP and air, in 22. Inside of 50 yds, they will do the job w/o the noise. Can't have firearm suppressors in Kali, so ... And since they are subsonic, they do not have the trans-sonic issues
smile.gif


And if you add a suppressor to the bullet performance equations above it's usually an even sloppier situation. 22LR just does not have the BC to do the range for me. My 6.5 OTOH and is crazy good out to 200. And the 22-250 is soooo nice out to 300.
 
Originally Posted By: 2015_PSD
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Same thing happens...but the higher B.C. will ALWAYS have less wind drift than the poorer.
Except in the example I gave of .223 versus .22-250, all of of the components were the same brand and type--bullets, cases, primers, & powder. To the extent possible, all variances were eliminated (except the obvious small primer versus large and increased powder charge). The bullets were the same B.C., but the .22-250 ALWAYS experienced less wind drift, and I attribute that to the velocity difference and nothing else.


Pretty sure that I said that too (bear in mind the subject, and the other was about bullets in the transonic range).

Both cases the 3,200 and the 3,600 fps projectiles (the .223 and .22-250 that I used), the higher velocity gave less wind-drift...more velocity for "all else being equal" in the extremely supersonic range, and the higher velocity has less delay, less delay equals less wind-drift.
 
Originally Posted By: billt460
The .22 Magnum will be less susceptible to wind drift within those ranges, because it has higher velocity with equal weight bullets.


NOPE...it's NOT simply velocity, which is time of flight...

http://www.shootingtimes.com/ammo/dont-blow-a-shot-in-the-wind/

Quote:
To minimize the effect of wind, we don’t necessarily minimize the bullet’s time of flight by giving it higher velocity, but rather we minimize the bullet’s lag time. Lag time is the difference between the time it would take a bullet to travel a given distance in a vacuum compared to its time of flight under actual conditions.

The formula for wind deflection is D=W(T-R/V) where D = bullet deflection in feet, W = crosswind in fps, T= time of flight in seconds, and R/V = range in feet divided by muzzle velocity in fps. If we launch a Sierra 190-grain MatchKing bullet from a 300 Win Mag at 2,900 fps, it would take the bullet 0.107 second to reach a target 100 yards away where its velocity would be 2,725 fps. In a vacuum, velocity would stay 2,900 fps and it would take 0.103 second for the bullet to go 100 yards, so the lag time is 0.0035 second. For a 10 mph, 90-degree crosswind, the deflection is 0.6 inches.

If we substitute Sierra’s 168-grain MatchKing bullet, we have to start it at a higher initial velocity—2,925 fps—to retain a 0.107 second time of flight to 100 yards where its velocity will have dropped to 2,706 fps. In a vacuum, velocity would stay 2,925 fps and the bullet would take 0.102 second to go 100 yards, so the lag time is 0.0044 second. For a 10 mph, 90-degree crosswind, the deflection is 0.8 inches. You can see by that example that both bullets had the same time of flight. The 168-grain bullet with its smaller cross-longitudinal area and greater initial velocity had more deflection than the larger, “slower” 190-grain bullet. The difference, of course, is that the 190-grainer didn’t lose its velocity as quickly, and thus had less lag time.


D=W(T-R/V)...R/V is the time of flight in a vacuum, therefore D=W x delay time

Nice little analogy dropping a bullet in front of a fan BTW...
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Shannow
NOPE...it's NOT simply velocity, which is time of flight.


I keep telling you. Put down your charts and graphs, AND GO TO THE RANGE. Prove it to yourself like I did, instead of trying to let the Internet "prove" it to you. I've shot both in equal crosswind conditions and the .22 Magnum DRIFTS LESS. Then again I don't live in a vacuum.
 
Originally Posted By: billt460
Originally Posted By: Shannow
NOPE...it's NOT simply velocity, which is time of flight.


I keep telling you. Put down your charts and graphs, AND GO TO THE RANGE. Prove it to yourself like I did, instead of trying to let the Internet "prove" it to you. I've shot both in equal crosswind conditions and the .22 Magnum DRIFTS LESS. Then again I don't live in a vacuum.


The science came from people trying to explain what they observed in real life...they've been observing same for hundred of years...

I've explained that I found a consistent holding over rather than guessing wind-drift, minimising my variables worked for me, and a number of people in my "Plinkers" club.


edit...imagine how much better your shooting will be if you ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND what's going on !!!
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Shannow
The science came from people trying to explain what they observed in real life....imagine how much better your shooting will be if you ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND what's going on !!!


And what I am telling you is what I have observed in real life in thousands of rounds from both guns. I have never had or seen a .22 Magnum drift more than a .22 L.R. in the same crosswind conditions. Why is that? Explain away what I've been observing and achieving my whole life with both calibers. You won't do it with charts, graphs, and links. Why don't you go out to the range and prove it to yourself? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound trying to tell someone that what they repeatedly observed over many years, didn't ever happen? How much actual comparison have you done with both calibers in crosswind conditions? I'm betting a grand total of none.

Originally Posted By: Shannow
Really not a fan of the calibre....


You wouldn't be coming off like this if you had. The fact is you have little to no real world experience with either of these calibers. And you keep trying to convince someone who has, that what they are observing doesn't really happen..... On a computer screen.
 
Originally Posted By: billt460
You wouldn't be coming off like this if you had. The fact is you have little to no real world experience with either of these calibers. And you keep trying to convince someone who has, that what they are observing doesn't really happen..... On a computer screen.


Don't you think that's enough, Bill?

Your argument has gone ad hominem.

If you read Shannow's posts, you'll see that he's spent time shooting competitively. It's not all "computer". But he's an engineer, so he seeks the science behind his observations. But your point; that he doesn't know what he's talking about because he doesn't shoot, simply rings hollow.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: Astro14
It's not all "computer". But he's an engineer, so he seeks the science behind his observations.


By his own admission he shoots little to no .22 L.R. or Magnum. And has no use for the caliber itself. That is fine. Just don't try to tell me something about a caliber he has little to no experience with, by arguing with nothing but computer data as your only vehicle. And trying to compare centerfire data with rimfire results is apples and oranges. Denying what someone else has physically observed literally dozens of times, over a number of years, by saying it can't happen because of what his, or someone else's computer says is simply ridiculous. He reminds me of the 9/11 Truther's, and the Flat Earth bunch. They have their "data" as well.
 
Originally Posted By: billt460
Originally Posted By: Astro14
It's not all "computer". But he's an engineer, so he seeks the science behind his observations.


By his own admission he shoots little to no .22 L.R. or Magnum. And has no use for the caliber itself. That is fine. Just don't try to tell me something about a caliber he has little to no experience with, by arguing with nothing but computer data as your only vehicle. And trying to compare centerfire data with rimfire results is apples and oranges. Denying what someone else has physically observed literally dozens of times, over a number of years, by saying it can't happen because of what his, or someone else's computer says is simply ridiculous. He reminds me of the 9/11 Truther's, and the Flat Earth bunch. They have their "data" as well.


That's not exactly what he said.

For example:

Originally Posted By: Shannow
I came across it when I was shooting in my rimfire field class competitions, ranges 30, 60, 90m, and 50, 100m.

My personal experience was that it was easier to establish a consistent hold for the poorer trajectory than it was to allow for greater wind drift...I had a few converts in the club who dropped back from the 1400fps LRs to the subs, and improve their scores markedly (whether it was confidence, or a smaller variability, who knows).

In the centrefire (.223 out to 600 yards), was using 60gr V-Maxes, and dropped to the A-Max (same BC, lower weight, more velocity) to REDUCE the hold by getting more velocity.

Not raining on anyone's parade, telling anyone what to do, just presenting a little known issue that occurs around the speed of sound.


He has done competition shooting with rimfires. This fact doesn't support the "computer data only" argument that you're making.
 
Originally Posted By: billt460
By his own admission he shoots little to no .22 L.R. or Magnum. And has no use for the caliber itself. That is fine. Just don't try to tell me something about a caliber he has little to no experience with, by arguing with nothing but computer data as your only vehicle.


IMG_20161224_091645.jpg


Rimfire field class...the wooden one is my wife's (hers was a combined single shot open sight/open sight air rifle handicap which was pretty good).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom