What model is it, if you don't mind me asking?Just checked... It's listed as unsupported in the OpenWRT db.
What model is it, if you don't mind me asking?Just checked... It's listed as unsupported in the OpenWRT db.
I'm away but I think it's an Archer C3200 (or similar).What model is it, if you don't mind me asking?
OK, the C3200 is a Work in Progress with DD-WRT, but has been for quite a while, so I'm not sure as to the status (real status) at this point.I'm away but I think it's an Archer C3200 (or similar).
Ive had nothing but success with them (and many people reading this forum) including countless computer magazines and online tech sources.TP Link has always been the most overrated garbage out there.
I did it 5 years ago and was so happy to throw it all away after two replacements and hours noodling with it.
To correct a previous post #65
I have a Tp-Link AC4000 (Archer C4000) that I picked up in Office Depot less than a year ago. At the time I was able to update the firmware last year to something fairly recent. Maybe 2023 (?) Still it is now "End of life" and no longer supported.
This CVE may be of interest to you (or maybe not, since you seem happy with just raw dogging it), since it seems to exploit this feature you've just discovered was enabled, regardless of whether it is active or not:Anyway I think this was one of those more rare lifetime subscriptions to TrendNet Home Care that came with the router and I was not aware of it. I think you can turn it off though, I might have enabled it when I first set up the router. To be clear I NEVER use any type of anti-virus or protection software. I dont believe in it and dont really care but it surprised me.
Anyway, almost one year later. I was going to my health insurance company website and I miss typed it. This came up and made me aware that I must have enabled it.
View attachment 257751
Yeah, DD-WRT is still around, though OpenWRT is more popular now.But yet, I see Hikvision CCTV at many buildings, and Costco still sells TP-Link routers and Dahua/Lorex CCTV.
It’s been a while since I used 3rd party firmware - is DD-WRT still a thing anymore and do they support mesh WiFi?
HikVision is only banned in government buildings last I knew as this was one of two main camera companies we used.But yet, I see Hikvision CCTV at many buildings, and Costco still sells TP-Link routers and Dahua/Lorex CCTV.
It’s been a while since I used 3rd party firmware - is DD-WRT still a thing anymore and do they support mesh WiFi?
For the same reason we wouldn't have let the Soviets make our electronics during the Cold War, or are you of the belief that all of the Soviet surveillance and espionage during that period was manufactured by the media as well?I’m no friend of China but let’s not be hypocrites when every product we buy in the USA is produced there OR contains their components. Why let every American company produce products there and then seek to prevent Americans buying directly?
I was thinking that, but what’s to say that those are absolutely legit either? Or anything else…?Can people just run OpenWrt ot Gargoyle firmware on those machines and still be fine?
No, we the people made stupid procurement decisions and chased cheap stuff to save a penny. The offshoring of any domestic manufacturing, not just tech, is due to our buying decisions, and business’ fiduciary responsibility to shareholders over the Nation’s industrial base and job pool.The government let most of the country's industrial base go to China but routers and Tic Toc are evil. Makes sense to me.
Exactly. And yet the folks who were calling it out were trashed as bad folks, even on here…Yep, it was all fun and games in the name of capitalism to exploit 3rd world labour in Asia, until the revenue from that process turned that 3rd world country into a global super power, then it was like "whoa boy!".
And if my recollection of history serves me right, most worms, viruses, etc also came through Microsoft.The idea that TP-Link is inherently less secure is being proposed by the WSJ.
Microsoft is reporting the vulnerability and method of attack. All that Microsoft says is that the majority of the attacks were carried out using TP-Link routers, which, all things equal, would make sense since that particular brand carries the majority of the market share in the US. Google is saying 65%.
Just for the record, dont paint me as naive. I never said I disagree with any of the above. My point has always been the vast majority talks the talk but doesnt walk it. I know China is not personally after me and the American population sadly could care less.For the same reason we wouldn't have let the Soviets make our electronics during the Cold War, or are you of the belief that all of the Soviet surveillance and espionage during that period was manufactured by the media as well?
We are far looser than we should be with regulation on stuff being made by and in China, and this has bit us in the rear many times. Poisoned pet food, leaded paint on kids toys, poor QC on outsourced goods. The idea that the Chinese wouldn't take advantage of the opportunity to leverage our insatiable thirst for cheap electronics as an "in" to aid in state surveillance and as a proxy to target government entities that would be shielded against foreign traffic is hopelessly naive.
Yes, all routers have end of life and I bet 75% or more of USA routers are there. Canvass your area door to door and ask how many homeowners know if their router is end of life. It doesnt matter any more than everyone's Social Security number is on the dark web as far as choosing one router above. I am certainly qualified to make this statement as having worked with hundreds of homeowner routers.more fun with certain older tplink model.
https://cybersecuritynews.com/poc-exploit-tp-link-router-web-interface/
View attachment 261735
That is this model.
View attachment 261736
And that's a big problem. People talk a big game, but when it comes to spending their money, that's often all it is, talk. The Chinese might use your information as an incidental, if it was easily obtained, but the point in going after consumers is generally to gain access to equipment that can be used as proxies to go after targets inside the geofence.Just for the record, dont paint me as naive. I never said I disagree with any of the above. My point has always been the vast majority talks the talk but doesnt walk it. I know China is not personally after me and the American population sadly could care less.
Yes, and that's the point. That attack (per the post you are responding to) was carried out through botnets embedded in the US, botnets consisting of compromised consumer and business equipment. That's the reason why this stuff should be more heavily regulated.China most likely is already deep into much of our infrastructure and the infrastructure of even components of USA companies. Example was the massive US Treasure Department Breach just last month, not sure if they still know how deep. Social Security Administration etc.
I am also hopeful this is tit-for-tat.Im sure they are into our electrical grid etc... I only hope we are into theirs.
Just because a vast majority of people do something out of cheapness, ignorance or stupidity, this doesn't invalidate criticism of that decision for being stupid. Look at how many people smoked (and smoke). Look at how many people drink, eat fast food...etc. People intentionally make stupid decisions on the regular on things they know about, now factor in that most of them know close to nothing about cyber security and it's a recipe for disaster.Im just not a hypocrite, select one subject like a router, when the entire population uses all their electronics and electronics built with China components, including now their homes, TVs, appliances, all security equipments, alarm systems, cameras and electric vehicle components tied into the internet, regardless of where the router was made.
(not into a debate but you paint me in the wrong light on this subject and need the record straight for others)