Originally Posted By: ekpolk
Well, once again, I'll pass on the Kool-Aid, and just invite you to point me to one teensy weensy example of GM, Ford, or Chrysler buying back a product that proved defective after 13 years...
Ford didn't need to buy back my 1996 Contour when the underhood wiring harnesses started to deteriorate. They just replaced them for free as part of an extended warranty (10 years, but still pretty impressive) they put on the harnesses just for this problem. (That's about a $1500 repair, given the cost of the harness and the labor to put them in).
The wiring harnesses were made by Yazaki with the wrong type of insulation for underhood applications. As a result, the heat deteriorated the insulation.
I find it a little curious that Ford has been able to build vehicles for years prior to 1995 (when the problem first started happening) that didn't have degrading harnesses and then they start using Yazaki as a supplier and this happens.
Well, once again, I'll pass on the Kool-Aid, and just invite you to point me to one teensy weensy example of GM, Ford, or Chrysler buying back a product that proved defective after 13 years...
Ford didn't need to buy back my 1996 Contour when the underhood wiring harnesses started to deteriorate. They just replaced them for free as part of an extended warranty (10 years, but still pretty impressive) they put on the harnesses just for this problem. (That's about a $1500 repair, given the cost of the harness and the labor to put them in).
The wiring harnesses were made by Yazaki with the wrong type of insulation for underhood applications. As a result, the heat deteriorated the insulation.
I find it a little curious that Ford has been able to build vehicles for years prior to 1995 (when the problem first started happening) that didn't have degrading harnesses and then they start using Yazaki as a supplier and this happens.