Toshiba V120 laptop VERSUS Dell T4500 laptop

Status
Not open for further replies.
For those of you who have replaced a backlight in your laptop's screen, is it easier to solder in the backlight or would it be easier to buy a backlight that already has the wires connected to it, so you would just need to plug in the wires into the laptop's socket?

I might buy the Toshiba with the AMD V120 processor (on sale at Office Depot for $350), but now that I've researched laptops a bit, I might wait for a laptop with an i3 processor to fall into the 350 to $400 range. The i3 CPU seems to be significantly faster than the AMD V120 / Sempron / Intel T4500 varieties??

Should I wait or pull the trigger before Saturday when the sale on the Toshiba with V120 CPU ends?
 
Last edited:
For reference, what's faster? A used desktop I bought on Craigs List for $40 that has a Pentium 4 running at 2.6 Gigahertz OR a Toshiba laptop with AMD V120 processor running at 2.2 Gigahertz?
 
One of the reasons I'll probably go with Toshiba is a Consumer Reports article I read that rated Toshiba laptops highly in reliability. From the June 2010 issue:

"Apple has been the most reliable desktop brand, but no one name stood out as clearly as the most reliable among laptop brands. That's what we found out when we asked more than 62,500 readers who bought a desktop computer between 2005 and 2009, and more than 75,000 who bought a laptop during the same period, about their experiences.

"The graphs [below] show the percentage of brands that have ever been repaired or had a serious problem. We've adjusted the data to eliminate differences due to age or whether the computer was covered by an extended warranty. For desktops, differences of fewer than 5 points aren't meaningful; for laptops, fewer than 3 points.

"Models within a brand might vary, and changes in design or manufacturing might affect reliability. Still, choosing a brand with a good repair history can improve your odds of getting a reliable model."

Chart 1: LAPTOPS

Top to Bottom (Fewer repairs to more repairs)

Toshiba .... 16 percent
Sony .... 17 percent
Compaq .... 18
Acer .... 19
Apple .... 19
HP .... 20
Gateway .... 20
Dell .... 21
Lenovo .... 21

======================
Surprisingly to me, Lenovo was at the bottom.
And Toshiba beat Apple (in laptops, not in desktops).
The desktop chart is shown below.
======================
======================

Chart 2: DESKTOPS

Top to Bottom (Fewer repairs to more repairs)

Apple .... 13 percent
Compaq .... 18 percent
eMachines .... 19
Dell .... 20
HP .... 21
Sony .... 22
Gateway .... 23

===============================
 
By the way, someone at Office Depot said the $75 rebate that Office Depot will give you when trading in a used laptop only applies to laptops that are working, meaning not a laptop that has a bad screen. The laptop also has to be reasonably recent, like have Windows XP on it.

I forgot to mention something in the interesting "Consumer Reports" excerpt that I just posted above. The magazine recommends checking the following web sites for deals:

TechBargains
FatWallet.com
Ebates
 
I would take the Consumer Reports surveys with a gigantic grain of salt.

I would choose the notebook with the Intel CPU.
 
Well, I already bought the Toshiba with AMD v120 processor :-)

Now I'll just load it with Ubuntu Linux and forget about the horrible Microsoft Windows operating system it came with ;-)
 
Last edited:
Just found another helpful survey comparing laptop makers:

From DigitalTrends.com :

Asus, Toshiba Notebooks Top SquareTrade’s Reliability Figures

By: Geoff Duncan
November 17, 2009

Extended warranty provider SquareTrade says Asus and Toshiba notebooks are the most reliable it sees...and Acer, Gateway, and HP notebooks are among the least reliable.

Independent warranty provider SquareTrade has released a study of more than 30,000 notebooks tracked through its extended warranty plans—and the results are a little surprising. Computer makers Asus and Toshiba led the pack in terms of notebook system reliability, with fewer than 10 percent of their systems needing repair after two years, with three-year failure rate projections of about 15.6 and 15.7 percent (respectively). And who’s in last place? Top computer maker Hewlett-Packard, with more than 15 percent of its systems failing after two years, and a three-year projection forecasting over a quarter of them will fail in three years.

“While our study found netbook malfunction rates to be trending 20 percent higher than more expensive laptops, the variance between manufacturer is far greater and should be a bigger factor in making a buying decision,” SquareTrade wrote in its report. “Asus and Toshiba laptops failed just over half as frequently as HP, which makes them a solid bet in terms of reliability.”

Overall, SquareTrade reports that 31 percent of all notebook owners reported a failure to SquareTrade; about two thirds of those failure were hardware malfunctions, while the remaining third of the failures were reported as accidental damage.

Unsurprisingly, Squaretrade finds inexpensive netbooks have higher failure rates than more mainstream notebook computers—and premium notebook systems have lower failure rates still. After a year, some 5.8 percent of netbooks had a malfunction, compared to 4.7 percent of mainstream notebooks and 4.2 percent of premium notebooks—that makes the failure rate for netbooks more than 20 percent higher than entry-level mainstream notebooks and 40 percent higher than premium notebooks. However, SquareTrade does note that netbooks haven’t been on the market very long, so the repair and problem data is still inconclusive.

SquareTrade is in the business of offering independent warranties to consumers. To produce this data, SquareTrade tracked failure rates for over 30,000 new notebook computers covered by SquareTrade warranty plans. Although that sample set is self-selecting—there’s no way of knowing how representative SquareTrade customers are of everyday computer users—the data does suggest significant variations in reliability among computer manufacturers…or significant variations among the way SquareTrade customers select and use different manufacturers’ products.

And industry darling Apple? SquareTrade ranked them number four behind Asus, Toshiba, and Sony, with a two-year failure rate a little over 10 percent and a projected three-year failure rate of 17.4 percent. Above average…barely.

http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/asus-toshiba-notebooks-top-squaretrades-reliability-figures/
 
Last edited:
Being the largest notebook OEM.... ASUS learns a lot about what NOT to do by building what their customers want.

Their notebooks just keep getting better and better. I handle a LOT of them.
 
My Toshiba laptops are excellent and definitely better than the HP/Dell units in my everyday usage. And, am tired of dealing with HP/Dell support when something goes wrong which is common enough.

Performance wise, the Dell has more CPU.

For the money, and for my personal reliability experience, I'd take that Toshiba, especially since you're really not a power user. Email, internet... doesn't need a mega-cpu.

With the number of laptops that I've serviced that were 12-24months old, none were Toshiba's. They were evenly split between Acer/Dell/HP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom