I don't think it will work unless it's an awesome vehicle. People are not going to shell out $100k just to make a statement and have an unreliable vehicle.Agree w/ you. But I do question if there will there be enough of them at the price point that Jaguar aspires to? I can see their approach working at the BMW/MB, etc. market, but I thought I read that Jag is talking a significant upmarket move to the likes of Bentley.
Also, I wonder how much this ad would alienate their traditional buyers any more than the all EV move. Tata can absorb a lot of losses for a 'halo' brand. The corporate type in me is very curious as to how this will play out.
We will see....
I guess when you are Jaguar you have nothing to lose???From a Forbes article that thinks the campaign is genius:
"From my totally unscientific subjective perspective, the attention has generally been quite negative. But I’m not sure that’s a bad thing. As Oscar Wilde famously said, “There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.”
I said the same thing! The company will go under, and critical parts won't be available at any price.Those of you who own classic Jaguars - my condolences and stock up on parts because whatever classic support now exists will be dead soon, like the rest of the company.
Nice styling. Nothing stopping Tesla from bringing something very similar to market. If they made it as a Model 3 I'd be in the market.Here is one "guess"
![]()
By now most of us have seen the Jaguar commercial. It is bizzare. No need to link to it. I've owned three (older) Jags and they were wonderful cars; if their British foibles can be overlooked. The newest iteration won't be seen until 2026 so actually Jaguar is a defunct auto maker right now. The new models should they be built will be all EVs. I won't buy one.
Any other Jag owners or automotive Anglophiles understand what's happening? I don't.
View attachment 250990
Forbes+
Wealthy people don’t necessarily care about cars. One of the wealthiest people I know (former college roommate) used to drive an old Volvo wagon.I will say yes Subaru has LGBT crowd however in New England it also has wealthy demographic buying an Outback or even commuter CrossTrek. There are 3 CrossTreks in executive neighborhood next to me where home min price is $1.75M and go up to $4-5m. A few Outbacks too. Also the owner of local Subaru dealership lives there.
Yes, 100% correct. Looks sell.Nice styling. Nothing stopping Tesla from bringing something very similar to market. If they made it as a Model 3 I'd be in the market.
Come to think of it, the Model S is very long in the tooth. If they made something both beautiful and reliable at current Model S prices (without goofy controls), a lot of us would be in the market.
Jag's SUV is a CUV at best with very good dynamics... LR/RR vehicles are, well mostly, in different league. Completely agree, this reinvention seems a Hail Mary pass.... That said, if nothing else the coverage, good or bad, reminds folks that Jaguar is still out there. maybe even attract a new audience and if followed up by a more subtle, less controversial marketing campaign, may work. Time will tell.I never understood why JLR is treated as two separate companies, or has been in the past despite the huge crossovers between them.
For years I've been saying that they should officially 'merge' and sell JLR badged cars rather than Jaguar or Land Rover. I.e. sell a JLR Range Rover, or a JLR XE, or a JLR Defender, or a JLR F-Type etc.
What I never understood is why Jaguar ever sold an SUV, because if you want an SUV Jag then surely you'd by a Land Rover?
Regardless of my ideas, I can't help but feel like it's game over for Jaguar. I suspect when they start failing they will find themselves with some convenient lumps of debt moved under their umbrella and they will disappear.
At least another old British company is rising from the ashes, Royal Enfield. The Indian’s are producing what people like and can afford in the motorcycle world.I can only say there goes another British icon right down the toilet. We all know the reasons and this is no place to discuss them.
Which came first, the chicken or the egg?Wealthy people don’t necessarily care about cars. One of the wealthiest people I know (former college roommate) used to drive an old Volvo wagon.
Well, while I agree that vehicle expenses are a huge part of budget, and that managing them is part of a solid financial plan…Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
About 40 years ago I discovered that having to depreciate our new and newer cars every year was having a major negative effect on our family's Net Worth. [I have calculated our family's Net Worth every January 1 since about 1980.] So I stopped buying new cars and started buying and then keeping good quality cars for as long as they're rust free and reliable - which is about 20 years.
I have to think that simple idea has had a big effect on our family's accumulating wealth.
All that to say, driving older cars may be one of the reasons your friend is wealthy.
Agreed. It just struck me as a high end fashion company which is the audience and style I picture Jaguar wanting to be part of. I love the brand. I just have my concerns about them having the right path forward, especially with so many upset about the ad. Seems people aren’t that open minded, but likely the people who can afford a premium vehicle might be a bit more open minded to follow the demographics some people quote of rich (insert political philosophy here).In my opinion, the whining about that ad is peak snowflake 1st world problem syndrome lol.
I saw the ad and personally, I thought it was weird in an avant-garde kind of way. It reminded me of mid-2000 advertising which was cool IMO. As soon as I saw it though, I knew a certain type of demographic was going to diap out about it and I was absolutely spot on.
Certain types of people are so predictable, I wouldn't be surprised if this wasn't what Jaguar wanted to happen with all that R&D they have.