Thinking of trading in the truck for a Tahoe...crazy?

Thermo1223

Thermo1223

Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
3,442
Location
Easton, PA
Yup that's me, with the equity I have in the truck and the need for a legit 3 row SUV for up & coming summer road trips. This plus transporting my in-laws around seems be a future concern. Hard to do that with only 2 useable rows.

Saw a bunch of Tahoe/Yukons with under 100k for a decent price. Truck is sitting at 114k now and consuming a bit of oil, maybe 1 qt every 1.5 - 2k miles.

It would be from the K2XX generation in my price range and other than the AFM I can't find any glaring issues.
 
Thermo1223 said:
Yup that's me, with the equity I have in the truck and the need for a legit 3 row SUV for up & coming summer road trips. This plus transporting my in-laws around seems be a future concern. Hard to do that with only 2 useable rows.

Saw a bunch of Tahoe/Yukons with under 100k for a decent price. Truck is sitting at 114k now and consuming a bit of oil, maybe 1 qt every 1.5 - 2k miles.

It would be from the K2XX generation in my price range and other than the AFM I can't find any glaring issues.
Click to expand...
Any diesel interest?
 
Thermo1223 said:
Yup that's me, with the equity I have in the truck and the need for a legit 3 row SUV for up & coming summer road trips. This plus transporting my in-laws around seems be a future concern. Hard to do that with only 2 useable rows.

Saw a bunch of Tahoe/Yukons with under 100k for a decent price. Truck is sitting at 114k now and consuming a bit of oil, maybe 1 qt every 1.5 - 2k miles.

It would be from the K2XX generation in my price range and other than the AFM I can't find any glaring issues.
Click to expand...
Third row is cramped. Bcs. solid axle the third row seats are really uncomfortable. That is why current generation has independent suspension in the back.
 
Thermo1223 said:
Yup that's me, with the equity I have in the truck and the need for a legit 3 row SUV for up & coming summer road trips. This plus transporting my in-laws around seems be a future concern. Hard to do that with only 2 useable rows.

Saw a bunch of Tahoe/Yukons with under 100k for a decent price. Truck is sitting at 114k now and consuming a bit of oil, maybe 1 qt every 1.5 - 2k miles.

It would be from the K2XX generation in my price range and other than the AFM I can't find any glaring issues.
Click to expand...
How many persons will be in the vehicle at max capacity? Do you have children who would sit in third row while your in laws are in the second row? If so, you might consider a Suburban or Yukon XL for more room. I agree that a light duty trailer to accompany the SUV would fit all your needs.
 
Trucks in my mind (and the market) keeps appreciating. Yours probably has another good 10-15 years before it will hit the point of depreciating value, but there is a remote chance it could then achieve collector status like the GMT400's oddly seem to have obtained.

In other words, I wouldn't sell it, just downgrade it to tertiary transportation, maybe even forget it exists for awhile. It was roughly 1 year ago I thought about selling my 26 year old GMT800, but since then I realized replacing it with another or even newer one would be unnecessary cost and stress.
 
Thermo1223 said:
Towing is non-existent, hauling is just general truck use like appliances/furniture. It could easily be accomplished with a small trailer or the rent-a-truck.
Click to expand...
Well, there's your answer. I see no problem other than getting a project trailer off the marketplace or somewhere for the side loads.
 
I would go with a Suburban but don't get the 6.2 engine. I have a Ford truck but I had a 99 Ford Expedition a few trucks ago and just loved that huge beast but it sucked a lot of gas with the 5.4 engine. Both the Suburban's and Expeditions are great choices.
 
Watch for rust on the K2XXs. The wax coating on the frames doesn't last long and the rear quarter panels and rockers seem to be rusting out on the earlier ones. Also transmission issues - my FIL has a 16 Yukon XL 5.3 he bought new and it's just over 100k, it's needed a new transmission, along with new AC system, new front control arms/tie rods, new air suspension in the back and new tail lights (condensation).
 
wwillson said:
Why not the 6.2 in a new Suburban?
Click to expand...
Because:

That John dude

Thread 'GM now saying to use 0w40 in 21-24 6.2L'

MOD NOTE:
Two threads with same topic have been merged as of 4-25-25 ...
Guy - please check before you post duplicate topics



In the L87 engines GM will be replacing your 0w20 oil with 0w40.
1745535063450.webp
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Love
 
KrisZ said:
Sounds like what would really suit your needs best is a minivan.
Click to expand...
I’d jump on a minivan also in this case. Passenger comfort, utility, it only lacks in machismo.

Suburbans are impressively reliable though, at least the 2000s ones were, but their back seats are for toddlers and midgets only. Hardly a third row at all. I know - I sat in one.
 
You want it, do it. Don't let people talk you up or down. Tahoe is a good size for what it is; only you know if it's a good fit. Well, you and the in-laws you stuff way in the back. 😁
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

dave1251
  • Locked
Exxon Mobil
Replies
19
Views
16K
MolaKule
buster
  • Locked
Great Article on GM/Daewoo Engineering
2
Replies
35
Views
13K
Willy_G
Back
Top Bottom