andrewg
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: Win
I have trouble making timely checks on my property and all of it is within a couple of hundred mile radius of my primary residence, so I would not even entertain the thought of owning something 1000-1500 miles away. Nor would I consider a relative in the area to be a viable plan for dealing with the property, and a rental agent who only makes money when the property is occupied is a guarantee that you will have a very low quality of tenant occupying your proeprty.
I have a second residence on a local lake and would never consider renting it out. First, I want to be able to use it when I want to use it - that was the whole point of buyng it. Second, the general public is really hard on property. Commercial property gets beaten up pretty fast, and lightly built residential stuff even faster. If you bought a house 1500 miles away and rented it out for fifteen years, it will be worn out by the time you want to live in it. If you want to own rental property, you want it to be a lot closer than several states away.
Think carefully about your plans in this regard.
As I said before, I will not rent it out. As for the relative? Well, that is just one piece of the whole plan. I've not yet decided who or what I can do about looking over my property when I am not there. I would not completely depend on a monthly visit from a relative, but being that he is in the town every month on a personal matter, he will be happy to check on it. I may even just allow him to stay there for his monthly weekend visits as a way of thanking him. I will need to look into other more contractual options for watching my property as well. Just have not got to that point yet. I may decide that logistically it's too far away. But I do know of some folks that live in Arizona but leave the home for four months every summer. Need to ask them what they do about watching a temporarily vacant home.
I have trouble making timely checks on my property and all of it is within a couple of hundred mile radius of my primary residence, so I would not even entertain the thought of owning something 1000-1500 miles away. Nor would I consider a relative in the area to be a viable plan for dealing with the property, and a rental agent who only makes money when the property is occupied is a guarantee that you will have a very low quality of tenant occupying your proeprty.
I have a second residence on a local lake and would never consider renting it out. First, I want to be able to use it when I want to use it - that was the whole point of buyng it. Second, the general public is really hard on property. Commercial property gets beaten up pretty fast, and lightly built residential stuff even faster. If you bought a house 1500 miles away and rented it out for fifteen years, it will be worn out by the time you want to live in it. If you want to own rental property, you want it to be a lot closer than several states away.
Think carefully about your plans in this regard.
As I said before, I will not rent it out. As for the relative? Well, that is just one piece of the whole plan. I've not yet decided who or what I can do about looking over my property when I am not there. I would not completely depend on a monthly visit from a relative, but being that he is in the town every month on a personal matter, he will be happy to check on it. I may even just allow him to stay there for his monthly weekend visits as a way of thanking him. I will need to look into other more contractual options for watching my property as well. Just have not got to that point yet. I may decide that logistically it's too far away. But I do know of some folks that live in Arizona but leave the home for four months every summer. Need to ask them what they do about watching a temporarily vacant home.