Plus, I don't see the full report for the MH1 in the google drive, just a snapshot of data.
Well, yeah, if I paid for testing and found out my HID projector got stomped by 1970s incandescent sealed beams, I wouldn't release the entire testing report either. I'm not the one who edited the data. TRS, who paid for the report, posted that snippet, and that snippet is all I get.
I'm pretty sure this is the last time we'll ever see a snippet of data from them again. Nope--they won't be making that mistake of releasing data to me again

.
On a serious note, the snippet has all the relevant data we need. The other data (that wasn't released) has to do with the color of the light in terms of CIE color coordinates, the cutoff gradient, etc. Not really relevant and likely too esoteric to be discussed here.
it won't have the benefits of a larger bowl or lens.
What benefits does the MH1 7.0 have? Doesn't seem to have any, given the above data, but I keep an open mind.
It's interesting to note that the MH1 7.0's peak intensity (21,389.24 cd @ 2.1D, 0.9R) is less than the peak intensity of the beauty of a headlamp shown below (23,421 cd @ 2D, 1R).
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/EJD6kQf.png)