Yeah, that was the reason a local ISP I have a good relationship switched from Cisco to Juniper, saved something like $15 million on just the contract cost, not to mention the much less expensive hardware.I replaced four Palo 5060s with Fortinet FortiGate 1800Fs for cost savings at a prior employer. Not my idea. Saved a half million dollars over 3 years versus buying Palo 5200 series to replace the 5060s.
Yes, and Palo has had their own vulns recently in their SSL VPN, but they don't have the array of problems that Fortinet does, nobody does that I have seen. They are not the largest target, yet have an absolutely staggering number of security vulnerabilities discovered and exploited, seemingly quite regularly.Palo is of course, extremely proud of their ish, and they have been for a while. But they are not without their own problems. We spent something insane (I think $3M) for a pair of 5450s to replace 5260s, because even though they weren't anywhere close to the bandwidth limits, we were hitting the session limits because we are defending a lot of IP space. Da fuq? I gotta replace a 1 million dollar firewall pair with a 3 million dollar pair of firewalls because we don't use very much NAT? I'd hate to see one of these things with an EMEA customer using real IPv6 space, they'd have a meltdown.
Also, you still can't negate source and destinations in Palo, I.e. if this traffic is not from the US, then do XYZ with it. I mean Cisco had this feature 30 years ago. But anyway. I've fallen out of love with Palo, but, what else is there that's any good? I have not suffered a breach using Palo gear, I can at least say that much for it.
Yeah, ASA's are/were clunky to work with, but were/are solid gear, if a bit antiquated (as were the PIX units they replaced). You'll laugh, but I've never had to deal with Palo, though I've seen a fair bit of it at various hospitals. Some medium sized hospitals use Meraki, though most of them are plain-Jane Cisco. Some also use Juniper. The odd one uses Aruba/HPE. I have some MSP's I deal with that use Fortinet, but I don't manage any of their equipment. I've also never used Barracuda, but have wanted to, have you used it?Ah yes we were talking about Fortinet. From a firewall admin perspective Fortigates aren't bad, the UI is pretty easy to work with both in the Web GUI and CLI. I'd take them over an old ASA any day from an ease of use perspective. But the software vulnerabilities make them unacceptable for use in any serious enterprise.
I got a call last year from the local Fortinet vendor rep, he had moved on to another job in a different company. Maybe saw the writing on the wall. Me and him were pretty tight for a while, we spent a lot of money with them a few years back at my prior employer. When I moved on in 2022 to a Palo shop he quit calling so much.
It's hard to believe FortiGate was in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant for Enterprise Firewalls in 2020. They have fallen hard since then.