Originally Posted By: Spazdog
I read "'90s Luxury Cars" and thought of these first:
The V6 Legend made more horsepower in it's 2.7 variant. The later 3.2 made quite a bit more.
And not only is it weak, the engine is terribly unreliable.
The "Chrysler Imperial" (real Imperials are their own marque) had a wonderfully plush button tufted Mark Cross leather interior and thick soft carpet harvested from the finest of teddy bears at FAO Schwarz....and that is the nicest thing I can say about it. Actually, the 3.3 isn't bad and it makes as much horsepower as the Cadillac HT4100, but it powers a big K-platform.
aaaannnd the Continental.Like Ford said, "Let's bloat out a Taurus, give it the bad V6 that has head gasket problems, a rear air suspension that will fail prematurely, a self destructing AXOD-E and a bad PCM. That's what we will do with one of our most respected Lincoln names!" At least the bloated K-car had a really plush interior and an okay engine.
I wonder how Amati didn't come to be. Clearly it wasn't the FWD domestic competition. Didn't take much to beat those.
Sadly in the 1980's and 90's American cars were not in the same world. The 2014 CTS OTOH is showing how the current world is changing. But in 1995 no American car could come within a mile of anything European or Japanese.