Autosteer is already limited in use cases; this will further restrict use.software update will limit where Autosteer can be used.
I assume ota makes these recalls rollout faster?
Definitely convenient for all parties involved.Is it actually a 'recall'? Or will it just be an OTA update? I don't feel like OTA updates count so much.![]()
This may be a deal breaker for you. OTA updates are a huge benefit allowing for quick, painless fixes as well as new functionality.I guess there must be some agreement between the owner of a Tesla and the company that allows them to push OTA a software update or feature change on to the car? Even Apple, which runs probably the most closed software system in public use, allows the owner of a computer or iPhone to decide if they want to do a software update. Does Tesla allow you to refuse the recall?
I like to research a recall before I bring in the car to have it done. This comes from a recall experience with an Isuzu Trooper II I owned. There was a recall on the rear door hinges because some owners reported difficulty opening the doors. My doors worked just fine but I took it in for the recall anyway. I thought they were going to change the hinge out. Instead when I got the car back the shop had drilled a hole in each hinge on the exterior metal part, through the paint and primer, and squirted a bit of oil through it to reach the pin. They then placed a plastic plug in the hole. I was then supposed to bring it in yearly for hinge oiling through the hole.
I would guess that Tesla doesn't need the $7500 to be competitive in selling their product and make money. As it stands right now most traditional manufactures building EVs need this $7500 to incent buyers and they are still in a loss position for every EV they sell.They also lost $7,500 tax write off.
Of course Tesla needs $7,500. I know Tesla has bunch of die hard fans that would buy vehicle even if it comes with complimentary dog poop inside.I would guess that Tesla doesn't need the $7500 to be competitive in selling their product and make money. As it stands right now most traditional manufactures building EVs need this $7500 to incent buyers and they are still in a loss position for every EV they sell.
Interesting note on the retail EV situation. Have a close by Ford dealer listing a 2022 Mach E for list $80k+ while I had a hard time selling a 2022 Mach E for just over $50k, similar miles (
How would you think it should be labelled in the automotive world?Yet another thing that doesn’t affect me since I don’t use driver aids in the car.
Software update? No let’s call it recall in the news to rile people up.
Hi Jeff,This may be a deal breaker for you. OTA updates are a huge benefit allowing for quick, painless fixes as well as new functionality.
These cars are different and are not for everyone.
This may be a deal breaker for you. OTA updates are a huge benefit allowing for quick, painless fixes as well as new functionality.
These cars are different and are not for everyone.
My point was on a comparison of the various manufacturers. As for specifically needing the $7500, given Tesla's advanced manufacturing and competitive lead on these techniques, they have found a way to overcome this, not a surprise in any way that that rebate was going away.Of course Tesla needs $7,500. I know Tesla has bunch of die hard fans that would buy vehicle even if it comes with complimentary dog poop inside.
However, there is drop in enthusiasm toward the brand for various reasons. Also, $7,500 buys A LOT of gas, especially if it is hybrid. They supposed to sack Tesla at the beginning of this year, but it was lobbied to extend benefits.
After all that $7,500 is still $7,500. It matters.