Tell me your top 3 oil filters for efficiency....

No but several filters will match them at 20 microns and for less than half the cost.
Yeah 20 is pretty good. Who wants to spend $30 to $50 on an oil filter that needs to likely be changed every oil change. There's a white paper on here that breaks down engine gunk by particle size. Catching most of the say 3 to 15micron bits would increase the dirt load on the filter something like 20% if I remember correctly over a 20micron.
 
Yeah 20 is pretty good. Who wants to spend $30 to $50 on an oil filter that needs to likely be changed every oil change. There's a white paper on here that breaks down engine gunk by particle size. Catching most of the say 3 to 15micron bits would increase the dirt load on the filter something like 20% if I remember correctly over a 20micron.
I prefer to change them at 5K rather than cut into the can at 15 or 20K and wonder did it turn into a tearolator at 500 miles or at 14.999?
Oh I bought my last Pentius filters 99% at 20 microns for $5.19 each extended life 10,000 miles.
 
I prefer to change them at 5K rather than cut into the can at 15 or 20K and wonder did it turn into a tearolator at 500 miles or at 14.999?
Oh I bought my last Pentius filters 99% at 20 microns for $5.19 each extended life 10,000 miles.
Guess we'll see. I've cut open dozens of OCDs that were ran for hundred hours and a few OCD, wix, napa that were ran for thousands of hours. None showed any signs it was about to give up.
The current oil filter on my truck has been on there for about 7,300 miles and the one on my wife's car has been on there over 8,000 miles.
 
Carquest Premium 99.5%@20
Microgard Select 99%@25
Premium Guard EX 98.7%@15

All the same filter with superior build quality currently.
Good roll up ! … I wonder how these filters would rank in ease of flow / flow rate ? Before their current production questions arose - the Fram Endurance had the highest flow rate combined with one of the highest filter efficiency .
 
Good roll up ! … I wonder how these filters would rank in ease of flow / flow rate ? Before their current production questions arose - the Fram Endurance had the highest flow rate combined with one of the highest filter efficiency .
My bet it the flow vs dP curves between all those filters is only going to be +/- a few PSI with hot oil. Not enough to matter to a PD oil pump on an engine, and all will flow way more than the engine needs.
 
Good roll up ! … I wonder how these filters would rank in ease of flow / flow rate ? Before their current production questions arose - the Fram Endurance had the highest flow rate combined with one of the highest filter efficiency .
Good point, the data is lacking. Too much of a bandwagon for me to buy PG. Always suspicious of too much promoting by owners of products. Gets pretty overboard here.
Purolator supplied internal spec sheets, how much better can that get, and Fram, the media is actually honest I believe. Although I don’t need the high particle load filtration numbers.
The Boss with good louvers avoids the glue worrying, so when I am 90 and don’t even have a car, I will be in the market. Or I could throw out all the filters in my box of filters except the one Boss I have now, and be in the market tomorrow. Exciting. I may do that, it’s no money really.
 
Wonder why the Napa Gold version of the PG filter is the only one rated at 30 microns?
I wonder if NAPA left the old M+H built NAPA Gold filter efficiency up on their website? If the PG filters for the NAPA Gold are really 99% @ 30u them maybe NAPA specified that target and the media is different in them.
 
Guess we'll see. I've cut open dozens of OCDs that were ran for hundred hours and a few OCD, wix, napa that were ran for thousands of hours. None showed any signs it was about to give up.
The current oil filter on my truck has been on there for about 7,300 miles and the one on my wife's car has been on there over 8,000 miles.

I've ran filters for over 30k miles, and they still looked new. And I've seen filters that ran less than 10k that were done.
 
I wonder if NAPA left the old M+H built NAPA Gold filter efficiency up on their website? If the PG filters for the NAPA Gold are really 99% @ 30u them maybe NAPA specified that target and the media is different in them.
There’s a little locally owned Napa franchise near me that I enjoy going in. Usually has his filter prices set reasonably. The NG for my Ram is $8 normal price.

Which would you do? Just run the NG and not worry about it, or stick with the other PG’s “knowing” they have the better media?
 
There’s a little locally owned Napa franchise near me that I enjoy going in. Usually has his filter prices set reasonably. The NG for my Ram is $8 normal price.

Which would you do? Just run the NG and not worry about it, or stick with the other PG’s “knowing” they have the better media?
I'd do more digging on the NAPA efficiency claim. Maybe contact NAPA directly if possible and verify if the efficiency info they show on their website is accurate for the PG made NAPA Gold filters, or is it left over M+H efficiency info?
 
all made by premium guard^ they’re the best value in filtration right now with excellent efficiency to boot. i run them 12k miles in industrial fleet service.
What I was thinking reading post #3 - you run them twice as long … or what I’m doing in two runs of an OTC synthetic and Fram Ti …
 
What do you mean hydraulic filters don't fit on an engine?
I've got 2micron filters that are 13/16-16 thread size for doing exactly what you say can't be done.
The only difference is a higher pressure bypass, they cost more, usually at least double that of a normal oil filter and are harder to find.
I think the 10micron absolute Baldwin's were around $30 and the 2micron wix were more like $50.
Often the difference is having no bypass at all in the hydraulic filters.

Hydraulic filters are designed for lower flow and higher efficiency. Restriction isn't such a big deal with 2500+ psi of pump available. On an engine oil pump, not quite the case.

There's zero practical benefit to 2 micron filtration on an engine oil system.
 
Often the difference is having no bypass at all in the hydraulic filters.

Hydraulic filters are designed for lower flow and higher efficiency. Restriction isn't such a big deal with 2500+ psi of pump available. On an engine oil pump, not quite the case.

There's zero practical benefit to 2 micron filtration on an engine oil system.
Or it has a kidney loop system - and on and on. Many hydraulic systems are custom designed per application …
 
Often the difference is having no bypass at all in the hydraulic filters.

Hydraulic filters are designed for lower flow and higher efficiency. Restriction isn't such a big deal with 2500+ psi of pump available. On an engine oil pump, not quite the case.

There's zero practical benefit to 2 micron filtration on an engine oil system.
These are low pressure filters. They'll burst at more like 250psi.
There's plenty of oil filters that don't have a bypass.
2 to 20 micron particles cause most of your wear, there's a lot of hydraulic filters that go well into that 2 to 20 range. For example my log splitter came with a 25mu rated filter, I'm sure it filtered well into the 10 to 20 micron range somewhat reliability.
After a quick bitog search I found a bigger 8 micron that would fit that filter head and that's what it's running now.
Sub 10 micron absolute low pressure hydraulic filters are pretty common.
 
Bandwagons materialize for a reason. The PureOne and then OG Fram Ultra both created a huge bandwagon until the wheels fell off those wagons and people bailed out, lol.
Band wagon is like a picture of something. People jumping on things influenced by others opinions. So there is this band on a wagon all tooting the same song.
 
Back
Top Bottom