Originally Posted By: KrisZ
You do realize that most manufacturers do not recommend 0w oils right? Then how can you keep saying that manufacturers know their engines best, on one side of the argument, and then recommend an oil weight that is NOT recommended by a lot of manufacturers, on the other side of your argument?
There's one problem with 0w-XX oils in normal, API/ILSAC speced engines. They tend to be synthetics, and priced as such. If you look at Petro-Canada's 0w-30, it meets SN/GF-5, along with Chrysler's own specification, to pick on one manufacturer's example. Let's assume that specification means it's allowed (if it didn't, it would be a rather meaningless specification, but that's another discussion).
Why would the average, relatively uninformed oil consumer wish to pay $7 a litre for PC 0w30 with the Chrysler spec when they could get 5w-20 or 5w30 with the same specification for half the price? I, too, wish the manufacturers were able to give a little more leeway with oil choices, particularly with choosing something in a 0w-XX specification.
If they mandate a 0w-XX, people get annoyed at the price (or OCIs have to be uniformly extended under the OLM). If they simply allow 0w-XX, people complain that the 0w-XX is too expensive, and few use it anyhow. In any case, ExxonMobil backs their 0w-XX products for warranty where 5w-XX is specified.