Supertech... now SM

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 15, 2003
Messages
42,726
Location
ME
Noticed ST dino now meets SM, 5w30 and 10w30 quarts on the shelves. ExxonMobil style bottle, east coast. Have been watching; seems new this week or so.
 
IT'S EXXON SUPERFLO--COMPARE THE BOTTLES--THE BOTTLE DESIGN IS AN EXACT MATCH (DOES NOT MATCH MOBIL)BUT THE PRODUCTION CODE SEQUENCE PRINTED IN SMALL WHITE LETTERS AND NUMBERS ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THE REAR LABEL PROVES IT BEYOND A DOUBT--IT'S A GREAT DEAL--88 CENTS A QUART (HERE IN RI) FOR WHAT IS REBOTTLED EXXON SUPERFLO! I'M STOCKING UP LIKE CRAZY SINCE I NOW KNOW IT'S EXXON SUPERFLO!
 
yo,madmike
 -
grin.gif
 
I wouldn't call it proven beyond a doubt. I believe Mobil supplies the base fluids, but I wasn't aware of them actually making it. Even if they did, it's unlikely it's exactly the same.

-T
 
In my local Walmart ST costs more than Exxon Superflo (.97 vs .94). The only problem is the Superflo is only available in 10/30 and 10/40.
I won't be using ST anymore since I can get a known brand for that price when it goes on sale.
 
One of the Super-Tech junkies will have to do a voa. Some of these new SM formulations are making uoa's difficult without knowing voa. The SM may look more "conventional" or it may not. The SM add paks are getting me confused.
shocked.gif
 
never realized so many people were "CAPS SENSITIVE"! the production codes on the bottle don't technically "prove" it's exxon, but it's about 99.9% probable! exxon wouldn't have separate (cheaper) additive packages to save a few cents a quart because it would cost that much to change over the line to do a "run" of super-tech using the different package--it's actually cheaper to just keep running the same oil down the same line and switch nothing but the bottles being filled from exxon to super-tech. this is where manufacturing efficiencies come into play and it's rarely cheaper to have an actual product difference that has to be accomodated in the production process which reduces efficiency an increases costs. take champion labs oil filters for example--they're sold under a million different private labels (lee, stp, super-tech, bosch, valuecraft, etc, etc) and they're the exact same filter coming down the assembly line--they just paint 'em a different color and/or slap a different label on 'em and they're out the door! it's the same thing with exxon and super-tech motor oil!
 
quote:

Originally posted by pbm:
In my local Walmart ST costs more than Exxon Superflo (.97 vs .94). ....

That's the thing....I was going to pick up a 5qt bottle of ST to try it out, and the per-quart cost was about .95, I think. I just bought 3 cases of Citgo oil from Farm & Fleet for .50/quart after rebate, so I couldn't justify buying the ST just yet.
 
definitely go with the superflo if it cheaper or the same price--then you can be 100% sure of what you're getting. (and them bright red bottles sure are purty!)
 
quote:

Originally posted by MADMIKE:
take champion labs oil filters for example--they're sold under a million different private labels (lee, stp, super-tech, bosch, valuecraft, etc, etc) and they're the exact same filter coming down the assembly line--they just paint 'em a different color and/or slap a different label on 'em and they're out the door! it's the same thing with exxon and super-tech motor oil!

Actually if you cut them apart you'd see they aren't all the same. Many have differnet medias and bypass valve locations.

-T
 
offtopic.gif
Today's manufacturing is very flexible and getting more so all the time. One machine can produce many different parts with, but a quick fixture change and a bit of re-programming. Bottling and mixing changes are even somewhat easier. We produced parts for "most" major motor companies, but because we made them did not mean they were to the same spec. Each is to a different spec. or requirement. I don't think, who a particular blender is means much, necessarily. They "could" be blending to different customer requirements and probably are.
 
i certainly agree with that but in this case i don't think anyone in the wal-mart purchasing department has enough technical knowledge of this complex subject to suggest or request anything other than what the supplier is currently offering--and since there's very little price difference between the exxon and super-tech (supposedly the super tech actually sells for a bit more in some areas) i doubt there's any difference in the formulation since any difference in formulation would be done to make the super tech less expensive, giving wal-mart a fatter profit margin on each bottle sold.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom