Originally Posted By: sleddriver
Originally Posted By: surfstar
hatt, your state is leading the charge in biased, anti science, denier, politicians
I think you have it backwards....exactly backwards. Mere agit-prop from the hive mind of eco-concensus. The wheels have already come off the mass-movement formerly known as global warming/AGW/climate-change. It's shattered into pieces after running straight into the ditch. So typical of all leftist movements founded on hysteria, raw emotion, fear and insecurity. No doubt brilliant in their speed, getting others quickly on-board, and their use of politik-speak and phrasing to unite the cause and propel the movement forward. Mark Twain said "A lie can get half-way around the world before the Truth ever gets its boots on." Indeed. Truth has finally done so, and caught up, and exposed yet another radicalized, environmental mass-movement for what lies at its heart: Man-made Fraud.
There's nothing new here. I've seen and heard it all before. One of the advantages of age and a keen skeptical eye for fads...and frauds. PT Barnum was right "There IS a sucker born every minute."
When the eco-movement started in the late 50's it wasn't nearly as radical and militant as it is now. However, history shows this is the defined path of such emotional mass-movements as they progress through the stages. The topics then were global freezing, over-population, Love Canal, DDT & nuclear power.
How ironic the later has the renewable hip-hop-flip-flop eco-crowd wrapping their arms around its cooling towers! Where is Simkin when I need him? He'd tear his smelly t-shirt, dump organic ashes on his head and drive his VW bus on the sidewalk at such news. Not to mention shut-up..finally.
Re: Kudos to Florida for eliminating the agit-speak in govn't documents. Those terms are nothing but aging, useless politik now. Burned through and cindered from the hot fires of the 1st stage.
Originally Posted By: surfstar
When it comes to biased scientists, I'm betting that there are much fewer in the 97% that agree vs the 3% who are obviously paid to disagree.
More agit-prop and backward statements. Further you aren't even aware of how foolish you look using that as an argument. Talk about a straw-man. Time to come up with something else as that play-book is already out in the open. Finally, "much" fewer?? FAR fewer.
Originally Posted By: surfstar
It is much easier to take down the opponents. Because, as you've seen, all of the denier articles etc, come from highly biased sources, that were paid for by Big Oil/Coal/etc or by groups who were founded with the specific purpose of denying climate change (who in turn are paid by those same corps).
Yawn....dude. You're just reguritating the agit-speak you've been willingly spoon-fed by the hive mind. Same song, verse 10,000,000. We've all heard it before. Bigxxx: Bad. Big_Green: Good. You should learn to think for yourself, independant of the hive-mind of eco-conscience, where resistance is futile. You should learn to question such abusive authority.
Originally Posted By: surfstar
Universities that fund the majority of scientific research were not founded on those types of principals.
Really? The glistening-white-ivory-towers of academia are immune to such infection and corruption? Hardly. Once again, you've got it backwards: They're bastions of it. Left and ... well even more left. Not only have you drunk the Kool-Aid, you're doing so from the very hot-pot in which you're being boiled! Have you checked your temp lately?
One more grammer lesson: Go look up the difference between principals and principles. You've gotten that one backwards as well...
Finally, while you are entitled to your own opinion, you're not entitled to your own facts. These are indeed inconvenient Truths. The alcohol-fueled emotional mass-movement ref'd to was so busy, going so fast, head-down, texting, they ran right into the FACTS. Inheritantly unyielding, that's why "the movement" is in pieces, in the ditch.
Spouting such, from a failed, twisted state such a Calif. makes you look really bad and foolish. What a shame such a beautiful state, with such a beautiful coastline, has suffered from such closed-minded, aging 60's radicals, still desperately attempting to hold onto power. Perhaps their arthritis prevents them from letting go?
Yesterday's Flower Children are Today's Blooming Idiots!
Indeed...
Zero. Value. Added.
Some of the others, including the deniers, have posted articles and intellectual thoughts. You've shared your own ravings. Seriously, unless you're any sort of intellectual in an applicable, relevant field, then your pointless post doesn't even amount to conjecture; it seems to amount to nothing more than petty name-calling.
That comment is for any one throwing the left vs right, right vs wrong argument around. None of our affiliations and opinions mean anything, unless they're able to be backed up. As an outsider to this arfument and a born skeptic, some of the posts here make me feel embarrassed for the author, not better informed or swayed to one side or the other.
Finally, 'grammar' was the word you were looking for. When you're going to school someone on something so stupid and petty, you might want to spell check.
