Originally Posted By: 92saturnsl2
Where did you get your driver's education?
4-way stops are not treated like a regular intersection with a light, where vehicles going straight have the right of way versus those turning left. Whether you're going straight or left, doesn't make a ****'s worth of difference at a 4-way stop.
From Wikipedia:
"After a full-stop has been made, vehicles usually have the right-of-way to proceed through the intersection in the order that they arrived at the intersection."
Even if there's a long line, one can usually tell when it is their turn based on which vehicles were already waiting when you pulled up to the stop.
Again, from Wikipedia:
"In the USA, if vehicles arrive at approximately the same time, each driver must yield to the drivers on their right."
I've never really practiced this, rather I give a hand gesture or go if I've received one-- Let common sense prevail.
I don't know how wikipedia holds up in court.
The
law here is vague and does not have specific instructions for four-way stops:
Quote:
7. Stop signs. Unless directed to proceed by a law enforcement officer or traffic control device, an operator of a vehicle approaching a stop sign shall stop and:
A. Yield the right-of-way to a vehicle that has entered the intersection or that is approaching so closely as to constitute an immediate hazard; and [1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).]
B. Having yielded, an operator may proceed. All other operators approaching the intersection shall yield the right-of-way to the vehicle so proceeding. [1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF).]
It appears two parallel straights are legal if both stop at some point and start at the same time (after cross traffic clears.) So long as they aren't infringing on each other's right of way.
Quote:
An operator intending to turn to the left must yield the right-of-way to a vehicle approaching from the opposite direction that is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard.
[ 1993, c. 683, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1993, c. 683, Pt. B, §5 (AFF) .]
I'm going to pin it on the turning SUV driver for not using her turn signal. This makes all the difference at a four-way
operating under local custom here. If she HAD used the blinker, the oncoming car should observe the "first come" rule. (tradition?) Other drivers are lulled into a complacency where they assume everyone else uses blinkers. In a more crazy situation they'd drive more defensively, go through 4 ways one at a time, and everything would move
more slowly due to the aggressiveness/ poor driving.