dnewton3
Staff member
This was WPP stuff.
I also would like to answer a PM question, but here in public for the discussion.
I fully understand that this is out of the comfort zone for many folks; I get that. It is NOT to be undertaken on a whim; you need to understand what you're doing and why.
However, here's what even Joe Average can take away from this:
there is a very large safety factor built into OEM OCIs, today's quality lubes, and filters.
Often we hear of folks justify their use of syns and premium filters because even though they only run 5-6k miles, they want "the added protection" of having those products just in case they over-run their intended OCI (As if any BITOGGER ever misses the chance to turn a wrench ....) This is the "cheap insurance" philosophy.
Well, I think I've shown that to be an invalid fear. There is a HUGE amount of reserve performance capacity in normal everyday lubes and filters. If you intended OCI is 5-7.5k miles, you most certainly don't "need" syns and a Pure One or K&N as a safety net. Good ol' dino oil and a decent filter can probably take you to 15k miles in a decent running engine. While you may feel it's not optimum, (and I might agree in some circumstances), it's surely not the end-of-the-world the way many BITOGers preach it to be. In the lack of evidence, perhaps there might be some logic to it. But between the long runs and tracking that 2010_FX4 has shown, Jim's filter info, and my exteneded runs, it's just an irrational fear to think that if you over-run an OCI by a few thousand miles, it would risk your precious investment. Heck, you could flat forget to OCI and blow right into the next one 7.5k miles later, and not be badly hurt. While perhaps not optimum, there is no need to panic if you miss an OCI. Just change the lube and filter, reset your OLM (electronic or hand-written) and sleep well at night realizing that your investment is not hopelessly damaged. So while I could understand that ultra-conservative approach in the absence of data, now that we have good info to show otherwise, you're already well protected even with normal" products, should you over-run your normal OCI. You don't need syns and such for added protection; it's already in the bottle, quite literally.
I also would like to answer a PM question, but here in public for the discussion.
I fully understand that this is out of the comfort zone for many folks; I get that. It is NOT to be undertaken on a whim; you need to understand what you're doing and why.
However, here's what even Joe Average can take away from this:
there is a very large safety factor built into OEM OCIs, today's quality lubes, and filters.
Often we hear of folks justify their use of syns and premium filters because even though they only run 5-6k miles, they want "the added protection" of having those products just in case they over-run their intended OCI (As if any BITOGGER ever misses the chance to turn a wrench ....) This is the "cheap insurance" philosophy.
Well, I think I've shown that to be an invalid fear. There is a HUGE amount of reserve performance capacity in normal everyday lubes and filters. If you intended OCI is 5-7.5k miles, you most certainly don't "need" syns and a Pure One or K&N as a safety net. Good ol' dino oil and a decent filter can probably take you to 15k miles in a decent running engine. While you may feel it's not optimum, (and I might agree in some circumstances), it's surely not the end-of-the-world the way many BITOGers preach it to be. In the lack of evidence, perhaps there might be some logic to it. But between the long runs and tracking that 2010_FX4 has shown, Jim's filter info, and my exteneded runs, it's just an irrational fear to think that if you over-run an OCI by a few thousand miles, it would risk your precious investment. Heck, you could flat forget to OCI and blow right into the next one 7.5k miles later, and not be badly hurt. While perhaps not optimum, there is no need to panic if you miss an OCI. Just change the lube and filter, reset your OLM (electronic or hand-written) and sleep well at night realizing that your investment is not hopelessly damaged. So while I could understand that ultra-conservative approach in the absence of data, now that we have good info to show otherwise, you're already well protected even with normal" products, should you over-run your normal OCI. You don't need syns and such for added protection; it's already in the bottle, quite literally.
Last edited:
