Some interesting details about GM's OLM

Status
Not open for further replies.
THANKS for posting this link!

It should be noted that GM has used DIFFERENT OLMs over the years! The current OLM was introduced with the then-new Trailblazer/Envoy platform a few years ago. This is the algorithm-based OLM. PRIOR to that, the OLM was strictly mileage-based, based on "normal" use as specified in the owner's manual (which is why the "Change Oil" light would come on promptly at a preset mileage number than by use and conditions (as the current OLM will).

Also, by the time the current OLM was configured, almost all of GM's engines were roller-lifter motors and not flat tappet motors (which pretty much disappeared in the later 1980s from GM's engine lineup).

In the Driver Information Center, this is where the "Oil Life Remaining" information will be listed. This information can be accessed by scrolling through the various menus of the Driver Information buttons--if it's in there.

The current GM OLM was another of their enhancements to help conserve natural resources (and possibly decrease owners' operating costs at the same time) by better modeling the need to do an oil change when it was really needed rather than an arbitrary mileage number (whether generated by dealership recommendations carried over from prior times or from owner's manual "normal use" recommendations). It also takes the need for an owner to read and understand the owner's manual's different maintenance schedules (normal use vs. severe/heavy duty use). A definite enhancement for sure!

Therefore, if the particular ownwer's manual states a particular oil change mileage interval, then it probably does not have the algorithm-based OLM, but the mileage-based version (which came earlier, as mentioned, than the introduction of the then-new Trailblazer platform, several years ago). Everything which came out the model year after the then-new Trailblazer should have the algorithm-based system.

With all of the GM engines being roller-lifter motors when the current OLM was introduced, that would lessen the impact of future oil standards which would have decreased the zddp additive levels to enhance emissions control system longevity. Although there is still some rubbing friction in the OHC engine designs, with the lesser need for stiffer valve springs, the particular rubbing friction should be less than with the prior pushrod OHV system and with gentler camshaft lobe shapes than with the pushrod OHV system. In the multi-valve/cylinder designs, less valve mass (and absence of pushrod weight to control via valve spring pressure) to control would mean less pressure where the rubbing friction interface is located.

From what I understand, the algorithm-based system takes all engine operating conditions into consideration. This would use existing computer sensors to supply the computer with to do its calculations. Also, the previous thread on this subject (about 15 months back from the present time) went into detail about how GM did their testing of the algorithm-based system--quite informative and from a GM engineer that had extensive experience with the research.

I hope this might clear up some of the comments about certain vehicles having the algorithm-based OLM rather than the mileage-based system, or vice versa.

Enjoy!
CBODY67
 
Agonizing over the parameters in an OLM is a waste of time when GM can't make their gaskets hold water. I have changed Manifold gasket twice in 115K miles on my v6 o2 silverado. Imagine what the oil is like in most peoples vehicles who do not have their oil tested. RW
 
A little more information on the GM algorithm-based OLM/OLS system is "hidden" in www.gm.com, in the (top of the page) drop-down menu which will get to their company information on envionmental issues (IF I remember correctly). I believe it has a larger chart which will better show the extremes of mileages on their "oil change window" curve.

In reality, their mileage recommendations on the newer link are pretty much in line with what we've used for years. In the years after unleaded fuel became to be used, the factory (GM's) oil change recommendation went to 7500 miles for normal use and was 3000 miles for severe use. All of this information was in the owner's manual back then. I think that few people (who were not on the highway all of the time) really went to the 7500 mile change interval, usually hitting somewhere in the 3000-4000 mile range.

Before somebody slams the dealerships for recommending the traditional 3000 mile oil change interval, it should be noted that our automotive culture has changed from "FULL SERVICE" gas stations to "self-service" gas stations (where there is no attendant to do a courtesy under-the-hood check for oil level and the need to change it). Therefore, if the customer followed the dealership's recommendations and let the dealership do the oil changes, at least somebody is looking under the hood at pretty regular intervals.

We used to joke about certain customers only putting gas in their vehicles and being oblivious to the need to change or add oil to the engine periodically. With the change of culture to generally self-service fueling situations, somebody has to make up the difference and that difference includes the various oil level (with the engine stopped) electronic sensors plus the (either one!) GM OLM/OLS on modern vehicles.

I think that if I had a newer GM vehicle with the algorithm-based system, purchased new or low-mileage used, used a high quality motor oil in it, then I think I'd be strongly inclined to trust the GM OLS rather than an arbitrary mileage orientation for oil changes. Others might get used to getting into a rhythm of getting their vehicles serviced otherwise, which is for their judgment to determine. If I was going to use synthetic oil, I then I would not hesitate to trust the OLS totally (all things considered).

I also suspect there is a certain amount of "safety cushion" built into the system, considering that warranty costs could be impacted if it was not.

In the case that an engine will need some oil between changes (or when the OLM/OLS light comes on), the additional oil would add to the existing level of additives in the existing motor oil. This fact was pointed out in a Cadillac forum on Northstar V-8 oil consumption.

With that information, it might be good for all future UOAs to note at what mileage the oil sample was taken and if the oil in the crankcase was un-added-to or if oil had been added during the test period. I believe that reasonably new modern engines should run well past the 3000 mile interval with not having to add oil to them, but older engines might have higher consumption rates and require additional oil during the test period.

Just some addtional thoughts . . .
CBODY67
 
GM Oil Life Monitor
Abstract
A method for advising a motor vehicle operator of the need to change the lubricating oil in a direct or an indirect injection diesel engine.
The rate of degradation of the engine oil is determined from monitoring engine revolutions, engine oil temperature and engine oil contamination content. At the start of service after an oil change has occurred, a value corresponding to the maximum allowed number of engine revolutions for the useful life of the oil is stored in the memory of the vehicle's computer.
Periodically during each period of vehicle operation, an effective engine revolutions value is determined in relation to the product of measured engine revolutions, an engine oil temperature dependent penalty factor and an oil contaminant content dependent penalty factor. The penalty factors increase the effective engine revolutions value to compensate for engine operating conditions that tend to cause increased degradation of the engine oil.
The effective engine revolutions value is subtracted from the stored maximum number of engine revolutions resulting in a remaining allowed revolutions value. Each time the effective engine revolutions value is calculated and subtracted from the remaining allowed engine revolutions value, a new remaining allowed revolutions value is stored in memory, replacing the old value. When the stored remaining allowed revolutions value is decreased below a predetermined threshold value indicating the end of the oil's useful life, an indicator advising the operator that the engine oil needs to be changed is activated.


















________________________________________
Claims________________________________________

What is claimed is:

1. In a motor vehicle having a direct or an indirect injection diesel engine containing lubricating oil which has a useful life that varies in accordance with engine operating conditions, a method for advising the operator of the vehicle of the need to change oil, such method comprising the steps of:

Periodically calculating an effective engine revolutions value over predetermined intervals during a present engine operation in accordance with a product of measured engine revolutions and engine oil temperature and engine oil contaminant penalty factors which operate to increase the effective engine revolutions value to compensate for engine operating conditions that tend to cause increased degradation of the engine oil, the oil temperature and oil contaminant penalty factors being determined as a function of engine oil temperature and engine oil contaminant values, respectively;

Decreasing a stored remaining allowed revolutions value indicative of the remaining number of engine revolutions allowed for the useful life of the engine oil by subtracting the calculated effective engine revolutions value; and

Actuating an indicator advising the operator that the engine oil needs to be changed when the stored remaining allowed revolutions value falls below a predetermined threshold value indicative of the end of the useful life of the engine oil.

2. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of calculating the engine oil temperature value in accordance with engine parameters prior to calculating the effective engine revolutions value.

3. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of determining the engine oil temperature value by measuring an engine oil temperature from an engine oil temperature sensor prior to calculating the effective engine revolutions value.

4. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the step of calculating the engine oil contaminant value in accordance with an oil temperature value, fuel injection timing, fuel quantity and engine rotational speed prior to calculating the effective engine revolutions value.

5. A method as in claim 2 wherein the step of calculating the engine oil temperature value includes the steps of:



When the engine oil temperature value is in a warm up range, calculating the oil temperature in accordance with a measured initial coolant temperature at the beginning of a current engine operation and a sum of engine revolutions since the beginning of the current engine operation; and

When the engine oil temperature value is in an equilibrium range, calculating the oil temperature in accordance with a measured coolant temperature, engine rotational speed, fuel quantity, intake air temperature and vehicle speed.

6. A method as in claim 2 wherein the step of calculating the engine oil temperature value includes the steps of:

When the engine oil temperature value is in a warm up range, calculating the oil temperature in accordance with a warm up equation T.sub.o =T.sub.ic +k.sub.1 R.sub.e wherein T.sub.ic is an initial coolant temperature at the beginning of a current engine operation, R.sub.e is sum of the engine revolutions since the beginning of the current engine operation and k.sub.1 is a constant; and

When the engine oil temperature value is within an equilibrium range, calculating the oil temperature in accordance with an equilibrium equation T.sub.o =k.sub.2 +k.sub.3 S.sub.e +k.sub.4 T.sub.c +k.sub.5 F.sub.q -k.sub.6 T.sub.a.+-.k.sub.7 V.sub.s wherein S.sub.e is engine rotational speed, T.sub.c is a coolant temperature, F.sub.q is fuel quantity, T.sub.a is an air intake temperature, V.sub.s is vehicle speed, and k.sub.2, k.sub.3, k.sub.4, k.sub.5, k.sub.6 and k.sub.7 are constants.

7. A method as in claim 4 wherein the step of calculating the engine oil contaminant value includes the steps of:

calculating the engine oil contaminant value, C, from an equation
C=k.sub.8 +k.sub.9 I.sub.t +k.sub.10 F.sub.q +k.sub.11 T.sub.o +T.sub.o +k.sub.12 S.sub.e,
wherein I.sub.t is fuel injection timing, F.sub.q is fuel quantity, T.sub.o is the calculated oil temperature value, S.sub.e is engine rotational speed, and k.sub.8, k.sub.9, k.sub.10, k.sub.11 and k.sub.12 are constants.



________________________________________
Description
________________________________________

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to the monitoring of engine oil in a motor vehicle and, more particularly, to a method for advising an operator of the need to change the engine oil in a direct or an indirect injection diesel engine based on oil temperature and oil contamination.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is known in the art relating to automotive vehicles that engine durability is directly related to the lubricating ability of the engine crankcase oil, and that its lubricating ability becomes degraded with engine operation and time. Thus, most engine and vehicle manufacturers provide their customers with oil change maintenance schedules for the point at which the engine oil should be changed. These oil change maintenance schedules are only guidelines and, depending on the engine operating conditions, the required oil change interval may be less than 3,000 miles or greater than 10,000 miles. To provide a more accurate prediction of the point at which the oil should be changed, an estimate of the extent of oil degradation and the need for an oil change for a given vehicle can be determined by electronically monitoring certain key engine operating parameters in the course of vehicle operation between oil changes. When it is determined that an oil change is required, the operator is so informed by an instrument panel indicator.

It has been shown that a direct and accurate indication of engine oil degradation can be determined by assessing two effects:
(1) chemical changes that occur as a consequence of exposure of the engine oil to high or low temperatures, without regard to engine loading or other operating conditions which may only be indirectly related to oil temperature, and
(2) formation of contaminants such as soot and acids that typically are produced at high load and high temperature.

Excessive degradation of the engine oil occurs at its temperature extremes. At low engine oil temperatures, typically during start-up, fuel and water can accumulate in the engine oil. Fuel and fuel reaction products can also enter the engine oil and cause a decrease in oil viscosity. This low temperature effect can occur completely independent of the load.

At high engine oil temperatures, antioxidants in the oil can become inactivated, and thus a major additive that provides chemical stability to the engine oil is no longer as effective as it was initially. As a consequence, the oil becomes more viscous and acidic due to oxidation and nitration. In addition, insoluble materials may be deposited on the engine surfaces as a varnish or sludge.

Another type of oil degradation occurs as a function of the rate at which fuel is injected into the cylinders of the diesel engine. Contaminants such as soot and acids form during incomplete combustion, typically at high temperatures and at high loads. Soot and acids that have entered the engine oil reduce the ability of the oil to prevent corrosion and increase soot-related wear. Therefore, it is desirable to provide a monitoring system that determines the need to change the engine oil based on both the degradation of the engine oil due to high and low temperature effects and the degradation due to contamination from load-related soot and acid effects.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a method for advising an operator of a motor vehicle with a diesel engine of the need to change the oil based on a calculated rate of engine oil degradation. The rate of engine oil degradation is affected by the temperature of the oil and the amount of contaminants entering the oil at high loads. Under conditions in which both temperature effects and high load effects are occurring simultaneously, the calculated rate of degradation takes into account both effects.

The rate of degradation of the engine oil is calculated by assessing the severity of engine operation as a function of both oil temperature and oil contamination. The severity of service due to differences in the engine oil temperature is assessed by determining an engine oil temperature value over a predetermined interval that may be measured in terms of time (for example, one second) or in terms of engine revolutions (for example, 500 revolutions) and assigning a penalty factor associated with that temperature. The severity of service due to contamination is assessed by calculating an engine oil contaminant value from various engine parameters and assigning a penalty factor for that value. In general, these relationships are established experimentally for each engine design.

The duration of each given effect is assessed by monitoring the elapsed number of engine revolutions or the elapsed time. At the start of service after a reset of the oil life monitor system, the number of engine revolutions corresponding to the maximum allowed number of engine revolutions for the useful life of the engine oil is stored in the vehicle's computer memory. In each period of vehicle operation, the stored number is decreased by an effective engine revolutions value determined in relation to the product of measured engine revolutions and the penalty factors found to be associated with engine oil temperature and engine oil contamination, resulting in a remaining allowed engine revolutions value. The penalty factors increase the effective revolutions value to compensate for engine operating conditions that tend to increase degradation of the engine oil. Each time the effective engine revolutions value is calculated and subtracted from the remaining allowed engine revolutions value, a new remaining allowed engine revolutions value is stored in memory, replacing the old value. When the stored remaining allowed engine revolutions value decreases below a predetermined threshold value, a signal is sent to the driver of the vehicle that an oil change is needed.



The engine oil temperature value used in determining the oil temperature penalty factor may be measured or calculated in one of two ways, depending on whether an oil temperature value is within a warm up range or in an equilibrium range.
When the oil temperature value is below a predetermined temperature, or within the warm up range, the oil temperature is calculated from the initial coolant temperature and the number of engine revolutions since the beginning of the present engine operation. Once the oil temperature has reached the predetermined temperature, or is within the equilibrium range, the oil temperature is calculated from measurements which may include engine rotational speed, vehicle speed, coolant temperature, fuel injection quantity (per cylinder) and intake air temperature. Statistical techniques are available and in common use to smooth the calculated oil temperature curve.
The engine oil contamination value used in determining the oil contaminant penalty factor is calculated from the oil temperature value, fuel injection timing (crank angle), fuel injection quantity and engine rotational speed.
Again, these operating conditions are available to the engine control computer and can be used in a simple linear equation to calculate a useful contamination factor to be applied to engine revolutions occurring in the test cycle. The constants of the equation are fitted statistically for each engine type based on experimental data.

In addition, in the event the engine operating conditions are not severe enough to cause the revolutions counter to expire, the indicator will be activated when the vehicle has been driven a predetermined number of miles, or the maximum mileage recommended by the vehicle manufacturer for oil change intervals.

These and other features and advantages of the invention will be more fully understood from the following description of a specific embodiment of the invention taken together with the accompanying drawings.




BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention may be best understood by reference to a preferred embodiment and to the drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system for indicating the point at which the oil in a diesel engine needs to be changed in accordance with the preferred embodiment;

FIGS. 2 and 3 are flow diagrams illustrating a flow of operations for carrying out a method of this invention to be executed by the system of FIG. 1;

FIG. 4 is a graphical representation of the relationship between oil temperature and a penalty factor value used in this invention;

FIG. 5 is a graphical representation of the relationship between oil contamination content and a penalty factor value used in this invention; and

FIG. 6 is a graphical representation of the relationship between an actual sensed engine oil temperature and an engine oil temperature as calculated by the method of the present invention.



DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Referring now to the FIG. 1 of the drawings in detail, numeral 10 generally indicates an oil change monitoring system connected with a motor vehicle diesel engine 12. The system 10 includes a controller 14, an engine coolant temperature sensor 16, an engine speed sensor 18, an intake air temperature sensor 20, an oil change reset 22 and an indicator 24. Generally, the controller 14 receives inputs from the sensors 16, 18, 20 and in response to those sensor inputs and other known engine parameters, such as fuel rate and intake air temperature, the controller 14 determines whether to activate the indicator 24 advising the operator of the need to change the oil. After the oil is changed, actuation of the oil change reset 22 sends a signal to the controller 14 to clear or reset certain variables used by the controller 14 to determine the degradation of the oil.
The controller 14 might typically include a microprocessor 26, an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 28, a counter 30, a nonvolatile memory 32, and an input/output (I/O) device 34. The analog outputs of coolant temperature sensor 16 and intake air temperature sensor 20 on lines 36 and 38, respectively, are applied to the A/D converter 28 where they are converted from analog signals to digital signals and made available for acquisition via a bi-directional data bus 42. The digital pulse train output of engine speed sensor 18 is applied to counter 30 via line 40 where it is divided down to a rate of one pulse per engine revolution and made available for acquisition via the data bus 42. Elements 28-34 communicate with each other via an address and control bus 44 and the data bus 42. The output of the oil change reset 22 on line 46 is applied as an input to I/O device 34, and the digital information for controlling the operation of the indicator 24 is outputted from the I/O device 34 via line 48.

Sensors 16, 18, 20 may be conventional temperature and speed transducers. For example, coolant temperature sensor 16 may be a varistor element housed in a conductive probe positioned in the mainstream of engine coolant flow or in any location where the measured engine coolant temperature is representative of the temperature of the engine as commonly understood by those skilled in the art of vehicle engine design, and the speed sensor may be a Hall effect sensor cooperating with a toothed ferromagnetic wheel coupled to the engine crankshaft. More detailed specifications of such sensors are readily available to those skilled in the art and therefore are not supplied herein.

Generally, the method of the present invention determines the remaining useful life of the engine oil until the next oil change by monitoring engine revolutions, oil temperature and oil contamination content. Typically, if an engine is cold at start-up, oil temperature steadily increases with each engine revolution. Once the oil temperature is greater than approximately 80.degree. C., it tends to assume a value which becomes nearly constant as a function of time or distance traveled as long as engine speed, vehicle speed, ambient temperature and fuel rate remain constant. The actual value of this substantially constant equilibrium oil temperature tends to be slightly higher than engine coolant temperature but varies with the previously mentioned factors.


Accordingly, the oil temperature is calculated in one of two ways depending on whether the oil temperature is in a warm up range or an equilibrium range. When the calculated oil temperature is in the warm up range, the oil temperature is determined from an initial engine coolant temperature and the sum of engine revolutions since the beginning of the engine start-up. When the calculated oil temperature is in the equilibrium range, the oil temperature is determined based on measurements which may include engine coolant temperature, engine speed, vehicle speed, fuel quantity and intake air temperature. Alternatively, a measured oil temperature read from an engine oil temperature sensor may be used rather than the calculated oil temperature value. The oil contamination rate is calculated from the calculated oil temperature, engine speed, fuel quantity and fuel injection timing.

The calculation of oil temperature, oil contamination and engine revolutions used to determine the remaining oil life is carried out during the time that the engine is in operation. During the entire period of operation, the calculation of remaining oil life is updated over a predetermined interval which may be measured either in terms of time or in terms of elapsed engine revolutions. As soon as the remaining useful life is updated, the next calculation of oil life begins.

The remaining useful life of the engine oil is calculated by multiplying measured engine revolutions by the penalty factors associated with engine oil temperature and engine oil contamination. The penalty factors compensate for engine operating conditions that tend to cause increased oil degradation. At the start of service after a reset of the oil life monitor system, the number of engine revolutions corresponding to the maximum allowed number of revolutions for the useful life of the engine oil is stored in the memory of the vehicle's computer. During each period of vehicle operation, the stored number is decreased by the effective engine revolutions value, resulting in a remaining allowed engine revolutions value. Each time the effective engine revolutions value is calculated and subtracted from the remaining allowed engine revolutions value, a new value for the remaining allowed engine revolutions value is stored in memory. When the stored remaining allowed engine revolutions value has decreased below a predetermined threshold value indicating the end of the useful life of the engine oil, the vehicle operator is alerted to change the oil. Also, if the maximum allowed number of traveled miles since the previous oil change, even if the remaining allowed engine revolutions have not reached the designated threshold value, a "change oil" signal will be activated.
 
In the Lord we trust, everyone else pays cash..
My Rendezvous has the OLM. The dealer changed the oil before I picked it up (corporate car,30k on the clock) . I let it run for 3028 miles, and had A UOA done to see where the engine was at with wear, and coolant contamination. Blackstone says all is well, the engine is still breaking in at 34k, and to go 4250 on the next change. I'm now a little over 8k since I bought it ( 2 changes of my own at 3028/34k, and 4000/38k) and the OLM still has not gone off from the dealers change. I agree that it will remind the uneducated to change the oil, but I don't believe it is bred for maximum engine life and cleanliness. YMMV, but 8k plus on conventional doesn't give me a warm fuzzy, and I'll put my faith in the 4250 recommendation from Blackstone.
 
Great post.

Quick question, why does highway driving appear to significantly impact oxidation stability? I am making the assumption that oil is in optimal temperature range during highway driving.

Tks for you help.
banana.gif
banana.gif
 
No, the Rendezvous has the leaky 3.4L V6.

If you have a 2004 or earlier, well, change your oil and filter every 3000 miles until you get have a set of updated gaskets installed.
 
JHZR2 , that's one of the more useful looks at what the OLM does under different conditions that I have seen. Thanks
 
Excellent. makes a great deal of sense.

BTW, how many BITOGers have a "built in OLM" ?

You just know when a car has had too many short trips, and dragging stuff around at low speed/high temp. You also have a feel for how many 1000km in one day trips you've done in an OCI.

Either system (computer or brain) beats a mandatory 10,000km anyday.
 
DakAttack. I have a Express van also. It only has an idiot light that comes on. I believe it is shaped like a wrench. I believe it works off the same system as we are discussing here. To reset, Turn ignition on, depress gas pedal 3 times within 5 seconds. The light should then turn off.
 
Quote:


THANKS for posting this link!

It should be noted that GM has used DIFFERENT OLMs over the years! The current OLM was introduced with the then-new Trailblazer/Envoy platform a few years ago. This is the algorithm-based OLM. PRIOR to that, the OLM was strictly mileage-based, based on "normal" use as specified in the owner's manual (which is why the "Change Oil" light would come on promptly at a preset mileage number than by use and conditions (as the current OLM will).






I hate to disagree with you, but according to ________ (former poster on this forum)
"The "real deal" GM oil life monitor works as I have described ... that is the way it has always worked since it's inception in the early 80's and first application in production in the 1986 model year. There has never been any sort of oil life monitor that is simply a mileage counter on a GM car"

He also states: "The algorithm was developed over the course of many years by several lubrication experts at GM Fuels and Lubes, spearheaded by Doctor Shirley Schwartz who holds the patents (with GM) for the algorithm and the oil life montitor. I had the luck of working directly with Dr. Schwartz when the idea of the oil life monitor first progressed from the theoretical/lab stage to real world testing/development/validation."
 
This would apply only to the GM Oil Life System (useage based) rather than the GM Oil Life Monitor System (mileage ONLY based).

The original explanation of the system (in the referenced comments of the GM engineer) stated that a key item was zddp depletion rather than "contamination" (which would occur in the lower mileage situations in colder ambient climates AND short trips). Yet "contamination" could play a role in the lower end of the useage-based recommendation where as "zddp depletion" could play a role in the upper end of the useage-based spectrum. Also, as different engines with the algorithm-based system might "shear"/degrade the lube sooner than others, this might result in different engine families having different values in the respective vehicle's software package?

I and others have used the "Oil Life System" and "Oil Life Monitor" somewhat interchangeably, when they can denote different systems that reach a "goal" in different manners--one more accurately, generally, than the other--with the algorithm-based system being somewhat more accurate. Yet each vehicle with either of these systems will have a "Oil Life Remaining" readout in the Driver Information Center (usually referred to as "Oil Life Monitor").

CBODY67
 
Quote:


This would apply only to the GM Oil Life System (useage based) rather than the GM Oil Life Monitor System (mileage ONLY based).

I and others have used the "Oil Life System" and "Oil Life Monitor" somewhat interchangeably, when they can denote different systems that reach a "goal" in different manners--one more accurately, generally, than the other--with the algorithm-based system being somewhat more accurate. Yet each vehicle with either of these systems will have a "Oil Life Remaining" readout in the Driver Information Center (usually referred to as "Oil Life Monitor").

CBODY67





You know this - how? What do you base your opinion on? The GM engineer was pretty adamant "There has never been any sort of oil life monitor that is simply a mileage counter on a GM car."
 
Quote:


Quote:


This would apply only to the GM Oil Life System (useage based) rather than the GM Oil Life Monitor System (mileage ONLY based).

I and others have used the "Oil Life System" and "Oil Life Monitor" somewhat interchangeably, when they can denote different systems that reach a "goal" in different manners--one more accurately, generally, than the other--with the algorithm-based system being somewhat more accurate. Yet each vehicle with either of these systems will have a "Oil Life Remaining" readout in the Driver Information Center (usually referred to as "Oil Life Monitor").

CBODY67





You know this - how? What do you base your opinion on? The GM engineer was pretty adamant "There has never been any sort of oil life monitor that is simply a mileage counter on a GM car."



Werd.

GM vehicles have never had a mileage timer or miles counter. Those are products exclusive to early model Hondas and Toyotas.

Some GM vehicles will merely display a "Change Engine Oil" message when the oil service is due, others will display % oil life remaining. They are the same system, it's just that some vehicles have the upgraded Driver Information Center to accommodate the % remaining capability.
 
If the OLM system does not actually ever touch the engine oil, then does the sensor know the difference between full synthetic engine oil, a blend, conventional or even a Group I base stock with no additives at all?
 
Quote:


If the OLM system does not actually ever touch the engine oil, then does the sensor know the difference between full synthetic engine oil, a blend, conventional or even a Group I base stock with no additives at all?



The type of oil, under GM's testing, will make little difference under normal driving conditions. GM recommends using an engine oil that meets the latest API and ILSAC specifications for the oil life monitor (system) to function correctly.
 
Bump and update. The OLM finally alerted at 9180 miles. The dealer fill was 10-30 bulk Quaker State. I like the technology, but still have a hard time swallowing that GM has the OLM tuned for maximum engine life and sludge avoidance, based on mileage and oil specs as called for in the manual. Especially on the 3.4 V6's with their ...um.... (whispering) leakage problem...
smile.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom