So I was going to continue a thread I had already started, but decided this is probably a new subject. i finally got comfortable with the decision to put 5w30 in my 2025 Skyactive NON-turbo engine INSTEAD of the recommended 0w20 , due to the fact I came to the conclusion it was only because of CAFE standards. And if they are recommending 5w30 in OTHER countries with the same climate, it stood to reason 5w30 is a good choice. A lot of you weighed in on this, and gave some great info!
HOWEVER,
I have stumbled across some interesting information since those posts, that has me thinking a bit differently.
Basically the information i found says that Mazda programs the ECM/ECU in the computer of the car DIFFERENTLY for different destinations. In other words, the car going to US isnt programmed the same as going to another country with different less strict CAFE standards, etc. Hence the different viscocity recommendations.
And YES, it still satisfies the CAFE.. BUT....
Some were saying that by using 5w30 instead of 0w20 in USA bound cars (that are programmed like this above ) it will in fact, put more drag on the engine , hence more wear BECAUSE of this programming that is done before they are shipped out.
IF this is true, that would tell me that owners manual is in fact correct and that 0w20 is IN FACT, a better oil for this engine than 5w30. Im not saying it makes 5w30 bad. Im just saying it would tell me 0w20 is BETTER for U.S bound skyactive non-turbo engines.
Im actually HOPING this information is NOT true. And i want to be wrong here.
Thoughts?