Food for thought. This thought has been bothering me for a while.
If it keeps Hillary B**** out of office why not?
If it keeps Hillary B**** out of office why not?
Should I Vote Kerry just to keep Hillary B**** out of office later on?
- Thread starter outrun
- Start date
- Status
Hillary could pull an Arkanacide(TM) with Kerry even if he does win.
1) Mods excuse my post, what i wrote occured to me after the fact. Yes, I am aware of rules here. Just the spector of Hillary scared me from sleeping and I woke up just to post that here.
2) What is Arkanicide?
2) What is Arkanicide?
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2003
- Messages
- 23,591
Don't worry. I'm sure calling someone a capital B asterisk asterisk asterisk asterisk isn't too offensive.
No. That's a silly reason to vote for a candidate. I'm sure there are a lot of liberals, etc that would LOVE you to vote for Kerry for ANY reason.
Unlikely Hillary would win, regardless.
Unlikely Hillary would win, regardless.
Can the country survive 4 years of Kerry?? Hilary will never win a predential election. Many democrats are Union Men. Anyone who has worked with Union men knows they will never vote for a woman. Hilary has too many skeletons. Also Kerry does not look very Healthy to me. I don't believe he can survive 4 years as President.
This November vote FOR whomever you think should be president and we can deal with the Hillary problem at a later date.
Most of Kerry's "support" seems to be in the form of voting against Bush rather than voting for Kerry, this is what I get from speaking to people I know and who plan to vote for Kerry that is the wrong way to pick a leader.
Most of Kerry's "support" seems to be in the form of voting against Bush rather than voting for Kerry, this is what I get from speaking to people I know and who plan to vote for Kerry that is the wrong way to pick a leader.
Outrun, No don't vote for Kerry just to keep Hillary from winning in 4 years. Kerry can do a lot of damage in 4 years with ultra-liberal judicial appointments etc. As an example we have
a Judge Sweet who was appointed by Carter. Judge Sweet has ruled that the NYPD can not search packages(handbags etc..) of people entering MSG for the Republican convention. He has made it easier for terrorist to bring a bomb/WMD in to the convention. I fear Kerry's liberal appointments who we will have to live with long after he's gone. Remember he is the most LIBERAL member of the US Senate.
a Judge Sweet who was appointed by Carter. Judge Sweet has ruled that the NYPD can not search packages(handbags etc..) of people entering MSG for the Republican convention. He has made it easier for terrorist to bring a bomb/WMD in to the convention. I fear Kerry's liberal appointments who we will have to live with long after he's gone. Remember he is the most LIBERAL member of the US Senate.
The propensity of those inconvenient to the Clintons to suddenly die of other than natural causes. Vince Foster is one of the most prominent examples.
I think we had better take care of the immediate danger now, and worry about Hiliary later.
It's how Vince Foster committed "suicide".
Uh Gary, New York, alone does not select our President last time I checked. Look at CA senators, heck look at MY state...all women (and crappy liberals, to boot) Does this mean they will be President, too?
The Senate may be lofty, but it's:
a) not nationally decided
b) not the best road to the White House
My opinion is the jerk that ran against Hillary must have been one piece of work, plus New York state is just about as Washington state when it comes to recent selection of senators....
The Senate may be lofty, but it's:
a) not nationally decided
b) not the best road to the White House
My opinion is the jerk that ran against Hillary must have been one piece of work, plus New York state is just about as Washington state when it comes to recent selection of senators....
Also known as the propensity for those inconvenient (I like that) to the Clintons to shoot themselves in the back of the head with a shotgun.
UPDATE TO ARKANICIDE:
Thanks for reminding me.
You guys also missed:
Chief of Naval Operations Jamie Boorda ("suicide" gunshot wound in his house)
Ronald Brown, Secretary of Education or Housing? (mysterious plane crash Bosnia-Herzogovina)
And Vince Foster
I am no conspiracy buff, but I did remember Lewinsky testifying that she was threatened that if she came forth she would end up like the people on Clintons dead staff list. How is that for ominious?
Then again Lewinsky and Clinton are not people of integrity either *lol*
Thanks for the post, I hate to take sides although obviously like most here I am a conservative, especially in foreign policy. Domestic and Economic policy i care little for, so i defer to dems on that one.
Whatever the case Hillary B*** has no place in the white house in my opinion. She is no Margaret Thatcher, Indira Ghandi, or Golda Meir. In my opinion she would do more damage to fems than any womanist or feminist could imagine.
EOM- Thanks guys and mods for not sacking me for the B*** remark. Like I said I was so scared I woke just to post this thought. *lol*
Thanks for reminding me.
You guys also missed:
Chief of Naval Operations Jamie Boorda ("suicide" gunshot wound in his house)
Ronald Brown, Secretary of Education or Housing? (mysterious plane crash Bosnia-Herzogovina)
And Vince Foster
I am no conspiracy buff, but I did remember Lewinsky testifying that she was threatened that if she came forth she would end up like the people on Clintons dead staff list. How is that for ominious?
Then again Lewinsky and Clinton are not people of integrity either *lol*
Thanks for the post, I hate to take sides although obviously like most here I am a conservative, especially in foreign policy. Domestic and Economic policy i care little for, so i defer to dems on that one.
Whatever the case Hillary B*** has no place in the white house in my opinion. She is no Margaret Thatcher, Indira Ghandi, or Golda Meir. In my opinion she would do more damage to fems than any womanist or feminist could imagine.
EOM- Thanks guys and mods for not sacking me for the B*** remark. Like I said I was so scared I woke just to post this thought. *lol*
wow....you guys are creeping me out....
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,798
We discussed this on another thread. The point is NOT how much damage that Kerry can do in 4 years. It's how much damage the following term will be with Hillary if GW is in for another 4 years. Since Kerry is such a loser ...he'll be defeated next election.
Anyone who doesn't think Hillary is poised like a viper in the wings, waiting to strike for the oval office, is surely far too near sighted and far too confident.
If GW wins ..you are almost assured of a Dem in office next term. Both parties do their damage and the nation will have had it with the current GOP. There is also no heavy weight contender for the GOP being warmed up in the bullpen.
If, on the other hand, Kerry gets elected. He will be the incumbant the following term. The left over damage that GW will accummulate will fall due on Kerry's term ..and a GOP candidate will probably be elected. By then Hillary will look pretty beat and will not be able to sell herself well.
This is a CHESS GAME my fellow kiddies ..NOT some delusional idealogical battle. So ...wave your banners ..spout your silly platitudes ...your grand convictions....
...and watch how your sphinctors twitch when Hillary is in the next election. All because you had to grab for GW NOW.
..like lemmings to the sea...
[ July 27, 2004, 12:33 PM: Message edited by: Gary Allan ]
Anyone who doesn't think Hillary is poised like a viper in the wings, waiting to strike for the oval office, is surely far too near sighted and far too confident.
If GW wins ..you are almost assured of a Dem in office next term. Both parties do their damage and the nation will have had it with the current GOP. There is also no heavy weight contender for the GOP being warmed up in the bullpen.
If, on the other hand, Kerry gets elected. He will be the incumbant the following term. The left over damage that GW will accummulate will fall due on Kerry's term ..and a GOP candidate will probably be elected. By then Hillary will look pretty beat and will not be able to sell herself well.
This is a CHESS GAME my fellow kiddies ..NOT some delusional idealogical battle. So ...wave your banners ..spout your silly platitudes ...your grand convictions....
...and watch how your sphinctors twitch when Hillary is in the next election. All because you had to grab for GW NOW.
..like lemmings to the sea...
[ July 27, 2004, 12:33 PM: Message edited by: Gary Allan ]
Twitch??? She won't even use any lube, unlike Bill!
I say MAYBE just MAYBE we would elect a female president, but she would HAVE to be pretty conservative....Hillary IS trying to tweak her votes in some Kerry-esk waffle-o-rama, but still...it just ain't gonna happen.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
- Messages
- 39,798
How can you say that, Pablo? She's in the second highest willfully elected position in the country (the VP comes as a package with the Pres.). This is after all the controversy and backroom fooling around that occured during her stay as First Lady. She's still powerful in spite of the shame and disrespect you assign her. How is this so? How can she be such a power broker if she's so impotent in the mass public's eye? It's because she isn't impotent. She's got clout.
You have to ask yourself...is it worth the risk??
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
