Shock Absorbers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 24, 2008
Messages
3,343
Location
Maryland
I know everyone will laugh, so here it goes, my friend asked me to post this, he has a 2009 Dodge Dakota, he has back problems and he thinks if he removes his shocks he will have a smoother ride and he will not feel any bumps when he goes over them.

I have no thoughts on this subject since I have never taken my shocks off and driven the car without them.

So post away and have some fun with this subject since I told him I would let him know next week what everyone has said.
 
Originally Posted By: wirelessF
I hope he does not get seasick or motion sickness.


When he asked me the question, I did all I could too not laugh, he even asked me about the cars springs, he took out his phone and got under the car and took pictures of the springs and shocks to show me what they looked like.

This guy is a DOCTOR.
 
Originally Posted By: c3po
Originally Posted By: wirelessF
I hope he does not get seasick or motion sickness.


When he asked me the question, I did all I could too not laugh, he even asked me about the cars springs, he took out his phone and got under the car and took pictures of the springs and shocks to show me what they looked like.

This guy is a DOCTOR.


Once again, it just proves that a DOCTOR is not an ENGINEER.

Let's pray that by removing shocks/struts he's gonna bounce back to good health. More importantly: his truck gonna be able to handle/stop properly.

Q.
 
Originally Posted By: tom slick
no shocks will make a rougher and less controllable ride. In fact "stiffer" bilstein shocks on my F-150 made it ride smoother, much less bounching.


That's my experience too. Better damping means less motion and it actually gives the feeling of a less harsh ride.

Back when I was 17-18 in '95 I tried taking my GN to the track with no front shocks to improve weight transfer. Bad idea. One bump on the way to the track meant 5 seconds of bouncing. Helped initial bite but then lost traction once I was off the line much worse than with the shocks on it. This would be a safety issue.

I think the guy would be better off looking into different seats if his back is that bad.
 
The initial impacts will be softer as long as they aren't big enough to bottom it out. The fun of driving a constantly bouncing truck probably won't last long though.

I think he should load the bed up with a few hundred pounds or lower the tire pressure. Wider tires might help a bit too.
 
He did lower the tire pressure, but doesn't that decrease gas mileage and wear out the tires.
 
He would get into big problem with the law and get sued for driving without the shocks if he get an accident.

If he wants a soft ride vehicle, he should look into buying a Lexus.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted By: c3po
He did lower the tire pressure, but doesn't that decrease gas mileage and wear out the tires.


For sure, but it sounds like he's already interested in far more drastic measures so I thought I'd throw it out there!

I like tom slick's idea: different vehicle.
 
The shock absorbers keep the tire in contact with the road whenever you driver over a series of bumps, or around here, it's what we call "washboards".
If he takes his shock completely off, he could very easily lost control of his vehicle and end up in an accident.
 
Sorry, but anyone who has the mental competence to come up with this idea in the first place shouldn't be driving at all as far as I'm concerned. Back problems?...how about a little higher up?
 
I have a one word response. Drugs. He's a doctor. He can get them. Probably free.

On further reflection, he probably doesn't need any more.

All kidding aside, have him load the back of the truck with something that will weigh it down. My 2500HD rides like a buckboard across a plowed field unless there is a lot of weight in the back. That might help.
 
He should maybe consider adding air bags to his set up. How old is his Dakota? I had a 2003 Quad Cab with all the bells and whistles the well and tire package, towing package HD eveything etc.... My Dakota drove and handled and felt like a 1990's Mustang 5.0 in terms of how it drove. It did not drive like a truck at all. It had very little sway and no bounce to mention. It was just the opposite of my 1986 Toyota 4Runner. I am woundering if his shocks are bad they normaly only last for about 30,000-70,000 from the OEM. Premium onces last a lot longer. Like KYB,Koni and BIlistein shocks last a lot longer then the cheaper OEM ones.

The only thing Ihated about my Dakota was the stock brakes and the fact that once a month I had to take it in for either a recall or for warranty work. By the time I traded it in I had abut 36,000 miles on it and everything under the hood that bolts to the engine had been replaced under warranty. IN terms of how it handled though it was great for daily driver. My 1986 $runner would get it alieve off road but it also did not handle as well as my Dakota on the road so their is good in bad in all. I think if he has a modern Dakota say 2001 and newer he is not going to find anything that rides much better. He can try replacing his shock's and he can try useing tires with less side wall flex as these will be less bouncy. Air Bags might help as well.

If he trys to run with no shock's not only will his braking be bad but handleing will be so bad he will probably kill someone and probably not himself. If he want to see what it will feel like just ahve him take a ride in a horse and buggy with leaf spring only setup!
 
Put a big old heavy fiberglass topper it'll ride like a cadillac. I didn't realize the difference it made in my truck till I took put it back on for the first time in a year.
 
Have you ever seen a car driving down the road and one of its tires is hopping and skipping all over the place? That's because it has a bad shock. No shocks pretty much = death and destruction.
 
Actually, heavy duty shocks will make the truck ride better. I put NAPA Gas Grande shocks on my 2001 Ram 1500 and it made a big difference. The truck was way too rough riding/bouncy before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom