Ah ok...
I know a Mid Saps HDEO is still more than a PCMO, but i'm very happy with the R4X and its 1.45 SAPS, I also know it has an average 1200ppm of Zddp which i like.
No catalytic converters or any exhaust after treatment to worry about.
TBN (ASTM D4739) 9,36
TAN (ASTM D664/974) 3,249
4 um , 6 um , 14 um ( ISSO 4406:99) 23/22/16
100°C , cSt (ASTM D445) 14,58
40°C , cSt (ASTM D445) 112,35
VI - (ASTM D2270) 133
(ASTM D5185)
Ca - Calcium, ppm 3434
Mg - Magnesium, ppm 17
P - Phosphorus, ppm 1088
Zn - Zinc, ppm 1120
Mo - Molybdenum, ppm 41
Ba - Barium, ppm 1
B - Boron, ppm 446
Si - Silicon, ppm 9
K - Potássio, ppm 0
Ti - 0
Cu - 0
Na - 0
V - 0
Mn - 0
The test was done last year and the bottle dated from 2014, although it is exactly the same (specs and bottle) as is sold today:
The results look similar from the one that the OP posted, maybe they use the same base oil but tweaks Ca, Mg and B depending were it is sold?Could this affect the TBN? Or maybe they have updated the formula from 2014.
Anyway, just wanted to share since it's a widely used oil but i can't seem to find other analysis from it.