wemay
Site Donor 2023
True, especially the LSPI for which the entire industry developed a amended spec.
That's quite contrary to the supposed efficiency advantage of GDI over MPI?Originally Posted by pitzel
....The cleanliness of GDI combustion also enhances the ability of such oils to withstand long drain intervals....
The incomplete combustion of GDI/TGDI engines is anything but clean. Wipe your finger around the inside of the tailpipe for a real shocker
They should be since they contain relatively little VII. 0W-8 oils are even more stable since they are essentially a 0W-20 oil without any VII. Monograde oils do not shear.Since last month, the Russian oil-club.ru has been testing shear stability. KO method, 90 cycles.
First 0W-20 results look very interesting
0W-20 Shear Stability Test
Сводная таблица лабораторных анализов масел вязкостью 0W-20 Shear Stability Test Проделана громадная работа, на которую потрачено очень много средств и времени, форумчан Oil-Club.ru. Спасибо Вам всем! 1. Extreme A.M.G. VR2 0W-20 GTE Shear Stability Test 2. Idemitsu Zepro 0W-20 API SN Shear Stabil...www.oil-club.ru
GDI allows higher static compression ratios and manipulation of injection timing that's independent from the operation of the intake valve, which allows a level of optimization not possible with a port injected configuration and a considerable bump in power, particularly when paired with a turbo or turbos.That's quite contrary to the supposed efficiency advantage of GDI over MPI?
I think the main problem with GDI is that the fuel is not well atomized and mixed with air. MPI seems more stable at lower speeds, whereas at higher loads and speeds GDI is definitely better
In general yes. But Idemitsu Zepro 0W-20 has 11,4% of viscosity decrease and Shell Helix Ultra 5W-40 API SP has only 1,7%.They should be since they contain relatively little VII.
Definitely. But also on the other hand mechanical shear is relatively rare in most engines. A few have a problem but most do not.”relatively little VII” does not always mean “more shear stable”. It also depends from VII type.
If the wear metals on UOA's have never been lower with GDI, and the increasing amount of timing chains wearing out, why doesn't the timing chain wear elevate the wear metals on UOA? Probably because the UOA's have shortcomings and isn't really that good of a source.Yet wear metals and insolubles have almost never been lower on the UOA's. So if the soot is abrasive, it sure isn't having any deleterious impact on the motor oil's operating characteristics itself.
Timing chains are wearing out (a previously unheard of phenomena) because of the ridiculous lengths and economizations (ie: on size) that are present..
That's quite contrary to the supposed efficiency advantage of GDI over MPI?
I think the main problem with GDI is that the fuel is not well atomized and mixed with air. MPI seems more stable at lower speeds, whereas at higher loads and speeds GDI is definitely better
Yes the higher compression ratio allowed by GDI results in higher output.GDI allows higher static compression ratios and manipulation of injection timing that's independent from the operation of the intake valve, which allows a level of optimization not possible with a port injected configuration and a considerable bump in power, particularly when paired with a turbo or turbos.
On the other hand, because GDI directs fuel directly into the cylinder rather than into a flow of air, there is the tendency for some of that fuel to:
A. Not combust properly, creating soot
B. Wash down the walls and get by the rings, making its way into the oil.
"B" seems to be even more prevalent on TGDI applications where enrichment levels are higher due to boost and cylinder pressures are also higher, likely aiding in more blow-by and more fuel making its way into the oil.
Of course GDI has also had other issues, which vary in severity depending on marque, such as intake valve deposits and LSPI in turbocharged applications.
The air/fuel mIxture of GDI can be so poor, particularly during cold start that engine designers resort to adding tumble valves at the intake to enhance & aid air/fuel mix by creating turbulent air.That seems to go against what I’ve read. Todays fuel injection is computerized and the injections are variable depending on conditions. They tend to run rich if the engine is cold but that is short lived.
Yes the higher compression ratio allowed by GDI results in higher output.
However, the compromises with GDI are quite considerable that they had to reintroduce MPI to address the issues.
Ford uses both GDI and MPI on the 2018+ Coyote.Toyota is the only marque I know of off the top of my head that has a hybrid GDI/MPFI setup. I outlined the caveats of GDI quite clearly in the post you responded to.
All engines shear oil, and some engines shear oil pretty good. And of course the amount of shear is also dependent on the oil. Any time an oil layer is between two moving parts it's being mechanically sheared. Here's UOA data collection of different oils used in 1st Gen Coyotes (2011-2014). Shear rate data is in the last column.Definitely. But also on the other hand mechanical shear is relatively rare in most engines. A few have a problem but most do not.
Was unaware, that's interesting. So we have two brands doing it now I guess. Of course the Gen 2 Coyote was port injected, so for the Gen 3 they've tacked on DI, apparently, to take advantage of the higher compression ratio:Ford uses both GDI and MPI on the 2018+ Coyote.
Without fuel being accounted for there, it's very hard to ascribe change in viscosity exclusively to shear. This is made even more opaque by the fact that these are different cars with different operating conditions. It is in no way a controlled data set and lacks any corresponding GC data.All engines shear oil, and some engines shear oil pretty good. And of course the amount of shear is also dependant on the oil. Any time an oil layer is between two moving parts it's being mechanically sheared. Here's UOA data colletion of different oils used in 1st Gen Coyotes (2011-2014). Shear rare data is in the last column.
View attachment 75611
True, a fuel dillution column would be nice. But at lease they are all 1st Gen Coyote engines (only MPI) which IIRC don't suffer from fuel dilution like a typical GDI engine.Without fuel being accounted for there, it's very hard to ascribe change in viscosity exclusively to shear.