Really short-term update #2:
Well, the drive home on the 14th was much better (shifting-wise) than the drive into work. I'm convinced that part of what I'm experiencing is temp/viscosity related, since the drive in was in the teens & the drive home was in the 30's. Yesterday's drives were also better, with inbound temps in the 20's & homeward temps in the 40's. As long as the shifting continues to improve, I feel much better about having the heavier oil (& moly) in there, especially for the bearings. Since the Rotella Syn 5W-40 is roughly 10% lighter than the D1300S, I might try 1 qt of M1 xW-30 (for the moly) & the remainder Rotella.
As a comparison, I drove my '90 this morning & it's now shifting as well as when I had any gear oil in it (it had Castrol dino gear oil for most of its life, & BG SyncroShift II syn for the past 30k-40k mi). It's been 1500 miles since the A-Rx treatment in this car's tranny, & the new oil mix is slightly different from what's in the '85 (maybe 70% D1300S 15w40, with the remainder being M1 10W-30). I also didn't particularly like the shifting in this car when I refilled with my mix, but it's been getting steadily better. This may point to some on-going after-effects of the A-Rx cleaning, or plating of the parts with moly, or some shearing of the oil from the gear train, or ???.
axjohn,
The only reference to gear lubes I've seen is on
Townsend's website. It's a very old document (1994? earlier?), & its origins are sketchy at best. It recommends against syn oils solely on the basis of seal integrity (which should be a non-issue with today's oils), but also mentions that gear oils should be changed at half the interval length (15k mi) of motor oils (30k mi). Many have said that Townsend actually recommended M1 15W-50 in all C900 trannies, but I've never seen it on his site.
You're right, the new 900's ('94 to present) are recommended to get Saab's syn lube, & that's what I'd suggest you stay with. But, like
carrera79 has said, I think Saab had some good reasons for spec'ing motor oil in these C900 trannies. (IMO, a very high heat load/soak is the biggest reason.) I liked the BG SS2, but it was horribly expensive & my shifting problem (5th gear sticking) came back anyway. I refuse to use RedLine, mostly due to the one local Saab garage that swears by it but also swears that C900 manual trannies are only good for 120k miles under the
best conditions. And I think the new Honda stuff is perfect for new Hondas, but probably wasn't spec'ed with a 25 yr old Saab tranny design in mind.
carrera79,
Let us know what you decide to use, & be sure to keep us posted as to how it works out!