OVERKILL
$100 Site Donor 2021
This is the sister review to my GMC Yukon Denali post:
I did err in my description of the Expedition, I thought it was a Limited, but when I went to take pictures, found it was an XLT.
Some exterior pictures:
Exterior impressions:
Definitely a more subdued approach to styling. Was surprised by the relatively small rims (and subsequently healthy sidewalls) which help with the ride quality. Not as attractive as the Yukon, but not ugly.
Ford has hidden the exhaust, rather than making it part of the aesthetic like on the Yukon. That's likely personal preference as to which one thinks is more attractive.
Performance:
This thing hauls. It feels much more powerful than the Yukon 6.2L and the EcoBoost just keeps pulling. Ford's transmission programming, as I mentioned in the other review, is also more spirited, so the shift feel and programming is less lethargic and it doesn't have the noticeable torque management. The engine is smooth and refined feeling with gobs of power everywhere.
Lots of room under the hood:
Packaging is typical Ford, not focused on looking good or likely accessibility/serviceability.
Infotainment:
Not quite as fancy as the GM offering. Typical Ford Sync setup, works as expected, the screen is nice sized and responsive but the integration is less attractive than in the GMC, with the protrusion above the dash and the "slab" approach to the screen/HVAC setup. Menu layout was intuitive, but I've used Sync a lot, so I may not be the best judge for somebody who has no experience with the system.
Cluster is mostly analog with a digital centre, unlike the Yukon, which has the fancier full digital cluster, which I think is more attractive and modern feeling. Gauges are large and easy to read.
No QC issues that I could see with the HVAC and infotainment.
Interior:
This is an XLT trim, so I think one needs to somewhat temper their expectations. It's not "premium leather" or anything and that's rather obvious. It's a typical Ford "Fisher Price" interior, lots of hard plastic, not a lot of focus on soft touch or making things feel upscale, but the seats are very comfortable, the ride is very good and one can gobble up the miles in solid comfort.
There were no obvious QC issues with the interior.
Overall, I found this the more impressive performing of the two vehicles and better put together (lack of QC issues) but found the Yukon was decidedly more upscale oriented with a better dash and aesthetic.
The Ford powertrain feels not only more competent (no odd vibrations, super smooth, clean, smooth, fast shifts) but considerably higher performance.
Of the two vehicles, even given the GMC's interior trimmings advantage, I favour the Expedition. This is mostly due to the powertrain.
Rental Review - 2024 GMC Yukon Denali
In the US for a few weeks and we have two rental vehicles: - 2024 GMC Yukon Denali - 2024 Expedition Limited I'll be reviewing the Expedition later this week. We've had both for approximately a week, the Yukon has just under 8,000 miles on it at present. Exterior pics: Exterior...
bobistheoilguy.com
I did err in my description of the Expedition, I thought it was a Limited, but when I went to take pictures, found it was an XLT.
Some exterior pictures:
Exterior impressions:
Definitely a more subdued approach to styling. Was surprised by the relatively small rims (and subsequently healthy sidewalls) which help with the ride quality. Not as attractive as the Yukon, but not ugly.
Ford has hidden the exhaust, rather than making it part of the aesthetic like on the Yukon. That's likely personal preference as to which one thinks is more attractive.
Performance:
This thing hauls. It feels much more powerful than the Yukon 6.2L and the EcoBoost just keeps pulling. Ford's transmission programming, as I mentioned in the other review, is also more spirited, so the shift feel and programming is less lethargic and it doesn't have the noticeable torque management. The engine is smooth and refined feeling with gobs of power everywhere.
Lots of room under the hood:
Packaging is typical Ford, not focused on looking good or likely accessibility/serviceability.
Infotainment:
Not quite as fancy as the GM offering. Typical Ford Sync setup, works as expected, the screen is nice sized and responsive but the integration is less attractive than in the GMC, with the protrusion above the dash and the "slab" approach to the screen/HVAC setup. Menu layout was intuitive, but I've used Sync a lot, so I may not be the best judge for somebody who has no experience with the system.
Cluster is mostly analog with a digital centre, unlike the Yukon, which has the fancier full digital cluster, which I think is more attractive and modern feeling. Gauges are large and easy to read.
No QC issues that I could see with the HVAC and infotainment.
Interior:
This is an XLT trim, so I think one needs to somewhat temper their expectations. It's not "premium leather" or anything and that's rather obvious. It's a typical Ford "Fisher Price" interior, lots of hard plastic, not a lot of focus on soft touch or making things feel upscale, but the seats are very comfortable, the ride is very good and one can gobble up the miles in solid comfort.
There were no obvious QC issues with the interior.
Overall, I found this the more impressive performing of the two vehicles and better put together (lack of QC issues) but found the Yukon was decidedly more upscale oriented with a better dash and aesthetic.
The Ford powertrain feels not only more competent (no odd vibrations, super smooth, clean, smooth, fast shifts) but considerably higher performance.
Of the two vehicles, even given the GMC's interior trimmings advantage, I favour the Expedition. This is mostly due to the powertrain.
Last edited:
