The Critic
Thread starter
Originally Posted By: Shannow
Nissan may (and I say may) have specified premium as the fuel for the life of the engine, but found in the real world that octane creep is lower than estimated, and then revised their recommendation to take advantage of that.
That sounds like a possibility, but this doesn't explain why members on the Nissan Murano forum have noticed reduced power and economy with 87 octane compared to 91/93. The difference, supposedly, is not subtle, but in fact rather noticeable.
Perhaps the next step for me is to go drive a 07 Altima with 91 octane in the tank and compared the two "butt dynos?"
Nissan may (and I say may) have specified premium as the fuel for the life of the engine, but found in the real world that octane creep is lower than estimated, and then revised their recommendation to take advantage of that.
That sounds like a possibility, but this doesn't explain why members on the Nissan Murano forum have noticed reduced power and economy with 87 octane compared to 91/93. The difference, supposedly, is not subtle, but in fact rather noticeable.
Perhaps the next step for me is to go drive a 07 Altima with 91 octane in the tank and compared the two "butt dynos?"